Do help-seeking adolescents report more psychotic-like experiences than young adults on the 16-item version of the prodromal questionnaire (PQ-16)?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Early Intervention in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1111/eip.13597
Yvonne de Jong, Albert E Boon, Cornelis L Mulder, Mark van der Gaag
{"title":"Do help-seeking adolescents report more psychotic-like experiences than young adults on the 16-item version of the prodromal questionnaire (PQ-16)?","authors":"Yvonne de Jong, Albert E Boon, Cornelis L Mulder, Mark van der Gaag","doi":"10.1111/eip.13597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in adolescents and young adults referred to the Mental Health Services (MHSs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants scored the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) as part of the intake procedure. Data on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) classification and demographic data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PQ-16 was completed by 13 783 respondents (mean age 24.63 years, SD = 6.09; 62.6% female). Overall, the scores on the PQ-16 were not higher for adolescents (11-17 years; m = 4.84, SD = 3.62) than for young adults (18-35 years; m = 5.47, SD = 3.85). On PQ-16 item level, adolescents reported seeing and hearing things more than adults did. Across all age groups, males scored lower on the PQ-16 than females. Specifically, adolescent males scored lower than other participants. For adolescents and young adults alike, PQ-16 scores were higher for participants with borderline personality disorder, PTSD, and mood disorder than for those with other DSM classifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although help-seeking adolescents did not score higher on the PQ-16 than help-seeking young adults, more of them reported perceptual anomalies. Irrespective of age, participants with borderline personality disorder, PTSD and mood disorder scored higher on the PQ-16 than those with other DSM classifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e13597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in adolescents and young adults referred to the Mental Health Services (MHSs).

Methods: Participants scored the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) as part of the intake procedure. Data on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) classification and demographic data were collected.

Results: The PQ-16 was completed by 13 783 respondents (mean age 24.63 years, SD = 6.09; 62.6% female). Overall, the scores on the PQ-16 were not higher for adolescents (11-17 years; m = 4.84, SD = 3.62) than for young adults (18-35 years; m = 5.47, SD = 3.85). On PQ-16 item level, adolescents reported seeing and hearing things more than adults did. Across all age groups, males scored lower on the PQ-16 than females. Specifically, adolescent males scored lower than other participants. For adolescents and young adults alike, PQ-16 scores were higher for participants with borderline personality disorder, PTSD, and mood disorder than for those with other DSM classifications.

Conclusions: Although help-seeking adolescents did not score higher on the PQ-16 than help-seeking young adults, more of them reported perceptual anomalies. Irrespective of age, participants with borderline personality disorder, PTSD and mood disorder scored higher on the PQ-16 than those with other DSM classifications.

在16项前驱症状问卷(PQ-16)中,寻求帮助的青少年是否比年轻成年人报告了更多类似精神病的经历?
目的:比较转诊至精神卫生服务机构(MHSs)的青少年和年轻成年人的精神病样经历(PLEs):方法:作为入院程序的一部分,参与者对 16 项前驱症状问卷(PQ-16)进行评分。方法:作为入院程序的一部分,参与者对 16 个项目的前驱症状问卷(PQ-16)进行评分,并收集有关《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)分类的数据和人口统计学数据:13 783 名受访者填写了 PQ-16(平均年龄 24.63 岁,SD = 6.09;女性占 62.6%)。总体而言,青少年(11-17 岁;m = 4.84,SD = 3.62)的 PQ-16 分数并不比年轻成人(18-35 岁;m = 5.47,SD = 3.85)高。在 PQ-16 项目水平上,青少年比成年人更多地报告看到和听到事物。在所有年龄组中,男性的 PQ-16 分数均低于女性。具体来说,青少年男性的得分低于其他参与者。无论是青少年还是年轻成年人,患有边缘型人格障碍、创伤后应激障碍和情绪障碍的参与者的 PQ-16 得分均高于患有其他 DSM 分类的参与者:尽管寻求帮助的青少年在 PQ-16 中的得分并不比寻求帮助的年轻人高,但他们中有更多人报告了知觉异常。无论年龄大小,患有边缘型人格障碍、创伤后应激障碍和情绪障碍的参与者在 PQ-16 中的得分都高于患有 DSM 其他分类的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信