Marco Lombardi MD, Rocco Vergallo MD, PhD, Andrea Costantino MD, Francesco Bianchini MD, Tsunekazu Kakuta MD, PhD, Tomasz Pawlowski MD, PhD, Antonio M. Leone MD, PhD, Gennaro Sardella MD, PhD, Pierfrancesco Agostoni MD, PhD, Jonathan M. Hill MD, Giovanni L. De Maria MD, PhD, Adrian P. Banning MD, Tomasz Roleder MD, PhD, Anouar Belkacemi MD, PhD, Carlo Trani MD, Francesco Burzotta MD, PhD
{"title":"Development of machine learning models for fractional flow reserve prediction in angiographically intermediate coronary lesions","authors":"Marco Lombardi MD, Rocco Vergallo MD, PhD, Andrea Costantino MD, Francesco Bianchini MD, Tsunekazu Kakuta MD, PhD, Tomasz Pawlowski MD, PhD, Antonio M. Leone MD, PhD, Gennaro Sardella MD, PhD, Pierfrancesco Agostoni MD, PhD, Jonathan M. Hill MD, Giovanni L. De Maria MD, PhD, Adrian P. Banning MD, Tomasz Roleder MD, PhD, Anouar Belkacemi MD, PhD, Carlo Trani MD, Francesco Burzotta MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) represents the gold standard in guiding the decision to proceed or not with coronary revascularization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesion (AICL). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows to carefully characterize coronary plaque morphology and lumen dimensions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We sought to develop machine learning (ML) models based on clinical, angiographic and OCT variables for predicting FFR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from a multicenter, international, pooled analysis of individual patient's level data from published studies assessing FFR and OCT on the same target AICL were collected through a dedicated database to train (<i>n</i> = 351) and validate (<i>n</i> = 151) six two-class supervised ML models employing 25 clinical, angiographic and OCT variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 502 coronary lesions in 489 patients were included. The AUC of the six ML models ranged from 0.71 to 0.78, whereas the measured F1 score was from 0.70 to 0.75. The ML algorithms showed moderate sensitivity (range: 0.68–0.77) and specificity (range: 0.59–0.69) in detecting patients with a positive or negative FFR. In the sensitivity analysis, using 0.75 as FFR cut-off, we found a higher AUC (0.78–0.86) and a similar F1 score (range: 0.63–0.76). Specifically, the six ML models showed a higher specificity (0.71–0.84), with a similar sensitivity (0.58–0.80) with respect to 0.80 cut-off.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ML algorithms derived from clinical, angiographic, and OCT parameters can identify patients with a positive or negative FFR.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ccd.31167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) represents the gold standard in guiding the decision to proceed or not with coronary revascularization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesion (AICL). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows to carefully characterize coronary plaque morphology and lumen dimensions.
Objectives
We sought to develop machine learning (ML) models based on clinical, angiographic and OCT variables for predicting FFR.
Methods
Data from a multicenter, international, pooled analysis of individual patient's level data from published studies assessing FFR and OCT on the same target AICL were collected through a dedicated database to train (n = 351) and validate (n = 151) six two-class supervised ML models employing 25 clinical, angiographic and OCT variables.
Results
A total of 502 coronary lesions in 489 patients were included. The AUC of the six ML models ranged from 0.71 to 0.78, whereas the measured F1 score was from 0.70 to 0.75. The ML algorithms showed moderate sensitivity (range: 0.68–0.77) and specificity (range: 0.59–0.69) in detecting patients with a positive or negative FFR. In the sensitivity analysis, using 0.75 as FFR cut-off, we found a higher AUC (0.78–0.86) and a similar F1 score (range: 0.63–0.76). Specifically, the six ML models showed a higher specificity (0.71–0.84), with a similar sensitivity (0.58–0.80) with respect to 0.80 cut-off.
Conclusions
ML algorithms derived from clinical, angiographic, and OCT parameters can identify patients with a positive or negative FFR.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.