Evaluation of Four Cloud Microphysical Schemes Simulating Arctic Low-Level Clouds Observed During the ACLOUD Experiment

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Jihyun Nam, Yeonsoo Cho, Kyo-Sun Lim, Sang-Yoon Jun, Joo-Hong Kim, Sang-Jong Park, Sang-Woo Kim
{"title":"Evaluation of Four Cloud Microphysical Schemes Simulating Arctic Low-Level Clouds Observed During the ACLOUD Experiment","authors":"Jihyun Nam, Yeonsoo Cho, Kyo-Sun Lim, Sang-Yoon Jun, Joo-Hong Kim, Sang-Jong Park, Sang-Woo Kim","doi":"10.1007/s13143-024-00378-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated the microphysical characteristics of low-level Arctic clouds using four cloud microphysics parameterization schemes (Morrison, WDM6, NSSL, and P3) implemented in the Polar-optimized Weather Research and Forecasting (PWRF) model. Our assessment was based on a comparison with data collected during the Arctic Cloud Observations Using Airborne Measurements during the Polar Day (ACLOUD) experiment, which occurred near Svalbard between May and June 2017. During the ACLOUD campaign, a substantial number of clouds were observed, primarily influenced by adiabatic motions and sensible/latent heat fluxes that led to air masses warming up by 4 °C as they traversed over the sea ice and ocean transition zone. Among the parameterization schemes tested, the Morrison and WDM6 schemes demonstrated superior performance overall, showing frequency bias (FB) values closer to 1 (1.07 and 1.13) and high log-odds ratios (0.50 and 0.48) in cloud occurrence predictions, indicating good agreement with observed data. In contrast, the NSSL and P3 schemes exhibited higher FB values (1.30 and 1.56) with lower log-odds ratios (0.17 and 0.16), indicating an overestimation of cloud occurrence. The WDM6 scheme produced higher ice-mixing ratios compared to Morrison and NSSL schemes, while the latter two tended to generate more snow and graupel. The NSSL scheme showed the least bias in simulating ice water content (IWC) in mixed-phase clouds; however, all schemes generally underestimated both liquid water content (LWC) and IWC. Notably, significant deviations in IWC were observed at an altitude of 1.2 km compared to observations, attributed to differences in temperature thresholds for ice formation. This study emphasizes the importance of developing cloud parameterization in the Arctic based on observations to improve the accuracy of estimating cloud impacts on Arctic climate under rapid Arctic warming trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":8556,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-024-00378-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the microphysical characteristics of low-level Arctic clouds using four cloud microphysics parameterization schemes (Morrison, WDM6, NSSL, and P3) implemented in the Polar-optimized Weather Research and Forecasting (PWRF) model. Our assessment was based on a comparison with data collected during the Arctic Cloud Observations Using Airborne Measurements during the Polar Day (ACLOUD) experiment, which occurred near Svalbard between May and June 2017. During the ACLOUD campaign, a substantial number of clouds were observed, primarily influenced by adiabatic motions and sensible/latent heat fluxes that led to air masses warming up by 4 °C as they traversed over the sea ice and ocean transition zone. Among the parameterization schemes tested, the Morrison and WDM6 schemes demonstrated superior performance overall, showing frequency bias (FB) values closer to 1 (1.07 and 1.13) and high log-odds ratios (0.50 and 0.48) in cloud occurrence predictions, indicating good agreement with observed data. In contrast, the NSSL and P3 schemes exhibited higher FB values (1.30 and 1.56) with lower log-odds ratios (0.17 and 0.16), indicating an overestimation of cloud occurrence. The WDM6 scheme produced higher ice-mixing ratios compared to Morrison and NSSL schemes, while the latter two tended to generate more snow and graupel. The NSSL scheme showed the least bias in simulating ice water content (IWC) in mixed-phase clouds; however, all schemes generally underestimated both liquid water content (LWC) and IWC. Notably, significant deviations in IWC were observed at an altitude of 1.2 km compared to observations, attributed to differences in temperature thresholds for ice formation. This study emphasizes the importance of developing cloud parameterization in the Arctic based on observations to improve the accuracy of estimating cloud impacts on Arctic climate under rapid Arctic warming trends.

Abstract Image

对模拟 ACLOUD 试验期间观测到的北极低空云层的四种云微观物理方案的评估
我们使用极地优化天气研究和预报(PWRF)模型中实施的四种云微物理参数化方案(Morrison、WDM6、NSSL 和 P3)研究了北极低层云的微物理特征。我们的评估基于与 2017 年 5 月至 6 月期间在斯瓦尔巴群岛附近进行的 "极昼期间利用机载测量进行北极云观测(ACLOUD)"实验所收集数据的比较。在 ACLOUD 活动期间,观测到大量云层,主要是受绝热运动和显热/炽热通量的影响,导致气团在穿越海冰和海洋过渡带时升温 4 ℃。在测试的参数化方案中,Morrison 和 WDM6 方案总体性能优越,其频率偏差 (FB) 值接近 1(1.07 和 1.13),云发生预测的对数胜率较高(0.50 和 0.48),表明与观测数据吻合良好。相比之下,NSSL 和 P3 方案的 FB 值较高(1.30 和 1.56),对数比率较低(0.17 和 0.16),表明高估了云的发生率。与 Morrison 和 NSSL 方案相比,WDM6 方案产生了更高的混冰比率,而后两者则倾向于产生更多的积雪和碎石。NSSL 方案在模拟混合相云中的冰水含量(IWC)时偏差最小;但是,所有方案都普遍低估了液态水含量(LWC)和冰水含量(IWC)。值得注意的是,与观测结果相比,在 1.2 千米的高度观测到的冰水含量有明显偏差,这归因于冰形成的温度阈值不同。这项研究强调了根据观测结果制定北极云参数的重要性,以提高在北极快速变暖趋势下估计云对北极气候影响的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (APJAS) is an international journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (KMS), published fully in English. It has started from 2008 by succeeding the KMS'' former journal, the Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (JKMS), which published a total of 47 volumes as of 2011, in its time-honored tradition since 1965. Since 2008, the APJAS is included in the journal list of Thomson Reuters’ SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) and also in SCOPUS, the Elsevier Bibliographic Database, indicating the increased awareness and quality of the journal.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信