The accessibility of digital technologies for people with visual impairment and blindness: a scoping review

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sara Hamideh Kerdar, Liane Bächler, Britta Marleen Kirchhoff
{"title":"The accessibility of digital technologies for people with visual impairment and blindness: a scoping review","authors":"Sara Hamideh Kerdar, Liane Bächler, Britta Marleen Kirchhoff","doi":"10.1007/s10791-024-09460-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This scoping review aimed to improve the understanding of important factors in digital accessibility for people with visual impairment and blindness, focusing on the first-hand experiences and challenges faced by this target group while using digital technologies. Keywords related to ‘digital technologies,’ ‘accessibility,’ ‘visual impairment,’ and ‘blindness’ were used in searching two databases (n = 683), with additional articles identified by means of manual searches (n = 60). Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts to select 97 articles for full-text screening, of which 49 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected for review based on the WCAG guidelines, highlighting details for consideration and improvement of the guidelines. The analysis revealed that users suffered from inaccessibility in several ways. For example, many applications or websites are developed for sighted users, where information is communicated through visual content without providing alternatives for assistive technology users. In addition, the lack of keyboard accessibility, shortcuts, or compatibility with different assistive technologies remains a consistent challenge. Furthermore, it was highlighted that simple accessibility measures are not followed adequately or consistently, such as providing alternative text for images or labels for links and buttons. This review highlighted the challenges and consequences of the inaccessibility of digital technologies, providing a detailed explanation regarding the elements that should be considered in the development of digital technologies. It is recommended that people with disabilities should be involved in the design of technology and its accessibility assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54352,"journal":{"name":"Information Retrieval Journal","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Retrieval Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-024-09460-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to improve the understanding of important factors in digital accessibility for people with visual impairment and blindness, focusing on the first-hand experiences and challenges faced by this target group while using digital technologies. Keywords related to ‘digital technologies,’ ‘accessibility,’ ‘visual impairment,’ and ‘blindness’ were used in searching two databases (n = 683), with additional articles identified by means of manual searches (n = 60). Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts to select 97 articles for full-text screening, of which 49 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected for review based on the WCAG guidelines, highlighting details for consideration and improvement of the guidelines. The analysis revealed that users suffered from inaccessibility in several ways. For example, many applications or websites are developed for sighted users, where information is communicated through visual content without providing alternatives for assistive technology users. In addition, the lack of keyboard accessibility, shortcuts, or compatibility with different assistive technologies remains a consistent challenge. Furthermore, it was highlighted that simple accessibility measures are not followed adequately or consistently, such as providing alternative text for images or labels for links and buttons. This review highlighted the challenges and consequences of the inaccessibility of digital technologies, providing a detailed explanation regarding the elements that should be considered in the development of digital technologies. It is recommended that people with disabilities should be involved in the design of technology and its accessibility assessment.

Abstract Image

视力障碍和失明人士使用数字技术的无障碍性:范围界定审查
本范围界定综述旨在加深对视障和失明人士数字无障碍环境重要因素的了解,重点关注这一目标群体在使用数字技术时的亲身经历和面临的挑战。在检索两个数据库(n = 683)时使用了与 "数字技术"、"无障碍"、"视力障碍 "和 "失明 "相关的关键词,并通过人工检索(n = 60)确定了其他文章。两名审稿人独立筛选了标题和摘要,选出 97 篇文章进行全文筛选,其中 49 篇文章符合纳入标准,并根据 WCAG 指南进行了审阅,重点强调了供考虑和改进指南的细节。分析结果显示,用户在多个方面受到无障碍访问的困扰。例如,许多应用程序或网站都是为视力正常的用户开发的,通过视觉内容传达信息,而没有为辅助技术用户提供其他选择。此外,缺乏键盘无障碍性、快捷键或与不同辅助技术的兼容性仍然是一个持续的挑战。此外,审查还强调,一些简单的无障碍措施没有得到充分或一致的遵守,例如为图像提供替代文本或为链接和按钮提供标签。本次审查强调了数字技术无障碍所带来的挑战和后果,详细解释了在开发数字技术时应考虑的因素。建议让残疾人参与技术设计及其无障碍评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Retrieval Journal
Information Retrieval Journal 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The journal provides an international forum for the publication of theory, algorithms, analysis and experiments across the broad area of information retrieval. Topics of interest include search, indexing, analysis, and evaluation for applications such as the web, social and streaming media, recommender systems, and text archives. This includes research on human factors in search, bridging artificial intelligence and information retrieval, and domain-specific search applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信