{"title":"Risk assessment for 3D printing in construction projects","authors":"Salma Ahmed, Lotfi Romdhane, Sameh Monir El-Sayegh, Solair Manjikian","doi":"10.1108/jfmpc-10-2023-0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this study is to identify and assess new risks in construction projects that use 3D printing.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A mixed approach of both qualitative and quantitative methods was used. Literature review was conducted to extract 30 risks of 3D printing in construction. A survey was then developed to assess the probability and impact of these risks. In total, 37 respondents, who have experience and/or knowledge of 3D printing, completed the survey. The risk priority was calculated using a fuzzy logic approach. The main benefit of the proposed model is being able to use numerical and linguistic data in the risk assessment model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that the main risks, in terms of priority, are lack of codes and regulations for 3D printing in construction, delay in government approvals, shortage in labour skilled in 3D printed construction, lack of knowledge and information of 3D printed design concepts and changes in 3D construction codes and regulations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper fills an identified gap in the literature related to 3D printing in construction and provides insights into the key risks affecting this disruptive technology.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-10-2023-0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to identify and assess new risks in construction projects that use 3D printing.
Design/methodology/approach
A mixed approach of both qualitative and quantitative methods was used. Literature review was conducted to extract 30 risks of 3D printing in construction. A survey was then developed to assess the probability and impact of these risks. In total, 37 respondents, who have experience and/or knowledge of 3D printing, completed the survey. The risk priority was calculated using a fuzzy logic approach. The main benefit of the proposed model is being able to use numerical and linguistic data in the risk assessment model.
Findings
The results show that the main risks, in terms of priority, are lack of codes and regulations for 3D printing in construction, delay in government approvals, shortage in labour skilled in 3D printed construction, lack of knowledge and information of 3D printed design concepts and changes in 3D construction codes and regulations.
Originality/value
This paper fills an identified gap in the literature related to 3D printing in construction and provides insights into the key risks affecting this disruptive technology.
本研究旨在识别和评估使用 3D 打印技术的建筑项目中的新风险。通过文献综述,提取了建筑中的 30 种 3D 打印风险。然后进行了一项调查,以评估这些风险的可能性和影响。共有 37 位具有 3D 打印经验和/或知识的受访者完成了调查。风险优先级采用模糊逻辑方法进行计算。研究结果表明,按优先顺序排列的主要风险是:缺乏建筑业 3D 打印规范和法规、政府审批延迟、缺乏熟练的 3D 打印建筑工人、缺乏 3D 打印设计概念方面的知识和信息,以及 3D 建筑规范和法规的变化。