Dissolved oxygen forecasting in the Mississippi River: advanced ensemble machine learning models

IF 3.5 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Francesco Granata, Senlin Zhu and Fabio Di Nunno
{"title":"Dissolved oxygen forecasting in the Mississippi River: advanced ensemble machine learning models","authors":"Francesco Granata, Senlin Zhu and Fabio Di Nunno","doi":"10.1039/D4VA00119B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Dissolved oxygen (DO) is an important variable for rivers, which controls many biogeochemical processes within rivers and the survival of aquatic species. Therefore, accurate forecasting of DO is of great importance. This study proposes two models, including AR-RBF by leveraging the additive regression (AR) of radial basis function (RBF) neural networks and MLP-RF by stacking multilayer perceptron (MLP) and random forest (RF), for the prediction of daily DO with multiple forecast horizons (1 day ahead to 15 days ahead) in the Mississippi River using a long-term observed dataset from the Baton Rouge station. Two input scenarios were considered: scenario A includes mean water temperature and a certain number of preceding DO values and scenario B comprises solely the aforementioned number of preceding DO values while entirely disregarding exogenous variables. The AR-RBF and stacked MLP-RF models excel in short-term forecasting and offer sufficiently accurate predictions for medium-term horizons of up to 15 days. For instance, in 3 day ahead predictions, the root mean square error (RMSE) amounts to 0.28 mg L<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) hovering around 2.5% in the worst-case scenario. Similarly, for 15 day ahead forecasts, RMSE remains below 0.93 mg L<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, with MAPE not exceeding 8.2%, even under the worst-case scenario. Both models effectively capture the extreme values and the fluctuations of DO. However, as the forecasting horizon is extended, both models experience a decrease in accuracy, which is particularly evident for scenario B when the average water temperature is not included in the input variables. When examining longer forecasting horizons in the study, AR-RBF demonstrates a more restrained bias as compared to the stacked MLP-RF model. The consistently robust performance of the models, in comparison to prior research on DO levels in US rivers, underscores their potential as more effective tools for predicting such an essential water quality parameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":72941,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science. Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/va/d4va00119b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science. Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/va/d4va00119b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dissolved oxygen (DO) is an important variable for rivers, which controls many biogeochemical processes within rivers and the survival of aquatic species. Therefore, accurate forecasting of DO is of great importance. This study proposes two models, including AR-RBF by leveraging the additive regression (AR) of radial basis function (RBF) neural networks and MLP-RF by stacking multilayer perceptron (MLP) and random forest (RF), for the prediction of daily DO with multiple forecast horizons (1 day ahead to 15 days ahead) in the Mississippi River using a long-term observed dataset from the Baton Rouge station. Two input scenarios were considered: scenario A includes mean water temperature and a certain number of preceding DO values and scenario B comprises solely the aforementioned number of preceding DO values while entirely disregarding exogenous variables. The AR-RBF and stacked MLP-RF models excel in short-term forecasting and offer sufficiently accurate predictions for medium-term horizons of up to 15 days. For instance, in 3 day ahead predictions, the root mean square error (RMSE) amounts to 0.28 mg L−1, with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) hovering around 2.5% in the worst-case scenario. Similarly, for 15 day ahead forecasts, RMSE remains below 0.93 mg L−1, with MAPE not exceeding 8.2%, even under the worst-case scenario. Both models effectively capture the extreme values and the fluctuations of DO. However, as the forecasting horizon is extended, both models experience a decrease in accuracy, which is particularly evident for scenario B when the average water temperature is not included in the input variables. When examining longer forecasting horizons in the study, AR-RBF demonstrates a more restrained bias as compared to the stacked MLP-RF model. The consistently robust performance of the models, in comparison to prior research on DO levels in US rivers, underscores their potential as more effective tools for predicting such an essential water quality parameter.

Abstract Image

密西西比河溶解氧预测:先进的集合机器学习模型
溶解氧(DO)是河流的一个重要变量,可以控制河流中的许多生物地球化学过程和水生物种的生存。因此,溶解氧的准确预报非常重要。本研究提出了两个模型,包括利用径向基函数(RBF)神经网络的加性回归(AR)建立的 AR-RBF 模型,以及利用多层感知器(MLP)和随机森林(RF)堆叠建立的 MLP-RF 模型,利用巴吞鲁日站的长期观测数据集,在多个预报范围(提前 1 天至 15 天)内预测密西西比河的日溶解氧。考虑了两种输入情景:情景 A 包括平均水温和一定数量的前溶解氧值,情景 B 仅包括上述前溶解氧值的数量,而完全不考虑外生变量。AR-RBF 模型和叠加 MLP-RF 模型在短期预测方面表现出色,在长达 15 天的中期范围内也能提供足够准确的预测。例如,在未来 3 天的预测中,均方根误差为 0.28 毫克/升,最坏情况下的 MAPE 约为 2.5%。同样,在提前 15 天的预测中,均方根误差仍低于 0.93 毫克/升,即使在最坏情况下,MAPE 也不超过 8.2%。两种模式都能有效捕捉溶解氧的极端值和波动。然而,随着预报范围的扩大,两种模式的准确性都有所下降,尤其是在输入变量中不包括平均水温的情况下,方案 B 的准确性下降尤为明显。与堆叠式 MLP-RF 模型相比,在研究更长的预测范围时,AR-RBF 模型的偏差更小。与之前对美国河流溶解氧水平的研究相比,这些模型的性能始终保持强劲,这凸显了它们作为更有效的工具来预测这一重要水质参数的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信