The legal, policy, institutional and programmatic context for protecting children against online sexual exploitation in Tunisia

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Dorra Loudhaief Midani, Antoine Deliege, Patrick Burton, Joshua Amo‐Adjei
{"title":"The legal, policy, institutional and programmatic context for protecting children against online sexual exploitation in Tunisia","authors":"Dorra Loudhaief Midani, Antoine Deliege, Patrick Burton, Joshua Amo‐Adjei","doi":"10.1111/chso.12895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence is absent in the legal, policy and programmatic landscape of online child sexual exploitation in countries in the Global South. Our work begins to contribute to filling this literature gap, drawing evidence from Tunisia, one of the least studied countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). We reviewed legal and policy documents directly or indirectly connected to online child sexual exploitation, complemented with interviews from diverse actors in the child protection space at the national and sub‐national levels. We note that Tunisia is a signatory to several international and regional treaties and conventions that can be leveraged to tackle online sexual exploitation of children. Still, these have yet to be fully exploited for the benefit of children. Furthermore, we observed several disparate laws at the country level. These laws are scattered in many legal documents, and some aspects could be more specific, but currently not, which poses significant legal challenges to protecting children. Finally, many institutions implementing programmes in this space create less coordination and sometimes confusion. At best, interventions seem ad hoc without any clear mandate of specificity in institutional leadership. The implications of the findings for policies and programmes are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":47660,"journal":{"name":"Children & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence is absent in the legal, policy and programmatic landscape of online child sexual exploitation in countries in the Global South. Our work begins to contribute to filling this literature gap, drawing evidence from Tunisia, one of the least studied countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). We reviewed legal and policy documents directly or indirectly connected to online child sexual exploitation, complemented with interviews from diverse actors in the child protection space at the national and sub‐national levels. We note that Tunisia is a signatory to several international and regional treaties and conventions that can be leveraged to tackle online sexual exploitation of children. Still, these have yet to be fully exploited for the benefit of children. Furthermore, we observed several disparate laws at the country level. These laws are scattered in many legal documents, and some aspects could be more specific, but currently not, which poses significant legal challenges to protecting children. Finally, many institutions implementing programmes in this space create less coordination and sometimes confusion. At best, interventions seem ad hoc without any clear mandate of specificity in institutional leadership. The implications of the findings for policies and programmes are highlighted.
突尼斯保护儿童免受网络性剥削的法律、政策、机构和计划背景
在全球南部国家,有关在线儿童性剥削的法律、政策和计划方面缺乏证据。突尼斯是中东和北非(MENA)地区研究最少的国家之一,我们的研究开始为填补这一文献空白做出贡献。我们查阅了与网络儿童性剥削直接或间接相关的法律和政策文件,并在国家和次国家层面对儿童保护领域的不同参与者进行了访谈。我们注意到,突尼斯是多个国际和地区条约和公约的签署国,可以利用这些条约和公约解决对儿童的网络性剥削问题。然而,这些条约和公约尚未被充分利用来造福儿童。此外,我们还注意到在国家层面有几项不同的法律。这些法律散见于许多法律文件中,有些方面可以更加具体,但目前还没有,这给保护儿童带来了巨大的法律挑战。最后,在这一领域实施计划的许多机构造成协调不足,有时甚至造成混乱。在最好的情况下,干预措施似乎是临时性的,机构领导没有任何明确的具体任务。强调了调查结果对政策和计划的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children & Society
Children & Society SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Children & Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high quality research and debate on all aspects of childhood and policies and services for children and young people. The journal is based in the United Kingdom, with an international range and scope. The journal informs all those who work with and for children, young people and their families by publishing innovative papers on research and practice across a broad spectrum of topics, including: theories of childhood; children"s everyday lives at home, school and in the community; children"s culture, rights and participation; children"s health and well-being; child protection, early prevention and intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信