Validity of scaling property and iso-centrifugal approximation in quasielastic barrier distribution: the first experimental verification

IF 2.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, NUCLEAR
Rohan Biswas, S. Nath, J. Gehlot,  Gonika, Chandra Kumar, A. Parihari, N. Madhavan, A. Vinayak, Amritraj Mahato, Shoaib Noor, Phurba Sherpa
{"title":"Validity of scaling property and iso-centrifugal approximation in quasielastic barrier distribution: the first experimental verification","authors":"Rohan Biswas,&nbsp;S. Nath,&nbsp;J. Gehlot,&nbsp; Gonika,&nbsp;Chandra Kumar,&nbsp;A. Parihari,&nbsp;N. Madhavan,&nbsp;A. Vinayak,&nbsp;Amritraj Mahato,&nbsp;Shoaib Noor,&nbsp;Phurba Sherpa","doi":"10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01380-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For the first time, we have simultaneously measured fusion and quasielastic excitation functions for an intermediate mass system for angular momentum, <span>\\(\\ell \\sim 0\\)</span> using a recoil mass spectrometer. We have extracted barrier distributions using three different sets of data recorded simultaneously for the reaction <span>\\(^{16}\\)</span>O+<span>\\(^{142}\\)</span>Ce: (a) fusion excitation function from measurement of evaporation residues at angle, <span>\\(\\theta _{\\text {lab}} = 0^{\\circ }\\)</span>, (b) quasielastic excitation function at center of mass scattering angle, <span>\\(\\theta _{\\text {c.m.}} = \\pi \\)</span> via measurement of scattered target-like ions at <span>\\(\\theta _{\\text {lab}} = 0^{\\circ }\\)</span> and (c) quasielastic excitation functions from measurement of scattered projectile-like ions at two large angles. We show that the four barrier distributions yield nearly identical results with a single peak. However, the centroids of the barriers extracted from quasielastic data at large angles are lower by <span>\\(\\sim 600\\)</span> keV compared to the same of the barriers extracted from fusion and quasielastic data for <span>\\(\\ell \\sim 0\\)</span>. This is the first experimental verification of the validity of scaling property with respect to <span>\\(\\ell \\)</span> and iso-centrifugal approximation in extracting fusion barrier distribution from quasielastic scattering. This work also points to the importance of extracting barrier distribution from quasielastic measurements at <span>\\(\\theta _{\\mathrm {c.m.}} = \\pi \\)</span> for systems for which measuring fusion excitation function with high precision is not feasible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":786,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal A","volume":"60 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal A","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01380-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the first time, we have simultaneously measured fusion and quasielastic excitation functions for an intermediate mass system for angular momentum, \(\ell \sim 0\) using a recoil mass spectrometer. We have extracted barrier distributions using three different sets of data recorded simultaneously for the reaction \(^{16}\)O+\(^{142}\)Ce: (a) fusion excitation function from measurement of evaporation residues at angle, \(\theta _{\text {lab}} = 0^{\circ }\), (b) quasielastic excitation function at center of mass scattering angle, \(\theta _{\text {c.m.}} = \pi \) via measurement of scattered target-like ions at \(\theta _{\text {lab}} = 0^{\circ }\) and (c) quasielastic excitation functions from measurement of scattered projectile-like ions at two large angles. We show that the four barrier distributions yield nearly identical results with a single peak. However, the centroids of the barriers extracted from quasielastic data at large angles are lower by \(\sim 600\) keV compared to the same of the barriers extracted from fusion and quasielastic data for \(\ell \sim 0\). This is the first experimental verification of the validity of scaling property with respect to \(\ell \) and iso-centrifugal approximation in extracting fusion barrier distribution from quasielastic scattering. This work also points to the importance of extracting barrier distribution from quasielastic measurements at \(\theta _{\mathrm {c.m.}} = \pi \) for systems for which measuring fusion excitation function with high precision is not feasible.

Abstract Image

准弹性势垒分布中的缩放特性和等离心近似的有效性:首次实验验证
我们首次使用反冲质谱仪同时测量了角动量中间质量系统的聚变和准弹性激发函数(\ell \sim 0\ )。我们使用为反应 \(^{16}\)O+\(^{142}\)Ce 同时记录的三组不同数据提取了势垒分布:(a) 从蒸发残余角测量的聚变激发函数,\(\theta _{text {lab}} = 0^{\circ }\), (b) 质量中心散射角的准弹性激发函数,\(\theta _{text {c.m.}} = \pi\) 时散射靶样离子的测量结果;(c)在两个大角度测量散射弹样离子的准弹性激发函数。我们发现四种势垒分布的结果几乎相同,都只有一个峰值。然而,从大角度的准弹性数据中提取的势垒的中心点比从聚变和准弹性数据中提取的势垒的中心点低了(\ell \sim 600)keV。这是在从准弹性散射中提取核聚变势垒分布时,对(\ell \)和等离心近似的缩放特性的有效性进行的首次实验验证。这项工作还指出了从(theta _{mathrm {c.m.}} = \pi \)的准弹性测量中提取势垒分布的重要性,对于无法高精度测量聚变激发函数的系统来说是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal A
The European Physical Journal A 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
216
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hadron Physics Hadron Structure Hadron Spectroscopy Hadronic and Electroweak Interactions of Hadrons Nonperturbative Approaches to QCD Phenomenological Approaches to Hadron Physics Nuclear and Quark Matter Heavy-Ion Collisions Phase Diagram of the Strong Interaction Hard Probes Quark-Gluon Plasma and Hadronic Matter Relativistic Transport and Hydrodynamics Compact Stars Nuclear Physics Nuclear Structure and Reactions Few-Body Systems Radioactive Beams Electroweak Interactions Nuclear Astrophysics Article Categories Letters (Open Access) Regular Articles New Tools and Techniques Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信