Understanding Clinician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Relating to Nonpharmaceutical Fentanyl and Harm Reduction.

Elena Whitney, George Weyer, Molly Perri, Sarah Dickson, Angela Kerins, Andrea Justine Landi, P Quincy Moore, John P Murray, Geoff Pucci, Mim Ari
{"title":"Understanding Clinician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Relating to Nonpharmaceutical Fentanyl and Harm Reduction.","authors":"Elena Whitney, George Weyer, Molly Perri, Sarah Dickson, Angela Kerins, Andrea Justine Landi, P Quincy Moore, John P Murray, Geoff Pucci, Mim Ari","doi":"10.1177/29767342241266421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonpharmaceutical fentanyl (NPF) is driving the national epidemic of opioid overdose deaths. Clinicians can play a role in fostering awareness of this growing risk and delivering interventions to reduce mortality. However, there is limited research assessing clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practices relating to NPF and harm reduction strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 34-question survey was designed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to NPF and harm reduction strategies of adult and pediatric hospital-based and emergency clinicians at a single academic medical center. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Chi square and Fishers exact tests were used to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 136 survey responses. The majority (88%) of respondents correctly answered a question on NPF potency. Most respondents were aware that NPF exposure was very (84%) or somewhat likely (10%) for someone using illicit opioids and very (44%) or somewhat likely (46%) for nonopioid drugs. Respondents viewed overdose prevention as highly important for patients using illicit opioids (93%) and nonopioid drugs (86%) but few (21%) were very/extremely familiar with overdose prevention strategies and just over half (57%) were comfortable/very comfortable counseling about overdose prevention. There was wide variability in utilization of harm reduction/treatment strategies (7.3% frequently providing fentanyl test kits to 70% frequently prescribing naloxone). Higher levels of comfort and familiarity with overdose prevention were associated with more frequent counseling on harm reduction strategies. Pediatric-only clinicians had less familiarity (5% very/extremely familiar) and comfort (35% comfortable/very comfortable) with overdose prevention, and limited use of harm reduction strategies (0%-31% using each strategy frequently).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While clinicians had knowledge and awareness of NPF and rated overdose prevention as highly important, utilization of harm reduction and treatment strategies was variable. This study highlights opportunities for education and system-based support to improve clinician-driven harm reduction practices for patients at risk of overdose.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241266421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonpharmaceutical fentanyl (NPF) is driving the national epidemic of opioid overdose deaths. Clinicians can play a role in fostering awareness of this growing risk and delivering interventions to reduce mortality. However, there is limited research assessing clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practices relating to NPF and harm reduction strategies.

Methods: A 34-question survey was designed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to NPF and harm reduction strategies of adult and pediatric hospital-based and emergency clinicians at a single academic medical center. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Chi square and Fishers exact tests were used to compare groups.

Results: There were 136 survey responses. The majority (88%) of respondents correctly answered a question on NPF potency. Most respondents were aware that NPF exposure was very (84%) or somewhat likely (10%) for someone using illicit opioids and very (44%) or somewhat likely (46%) for nonopioid drugs. Respondents viewed overdose prevention as highly important for patients using illicit opioids (93%) and nonopioid drugs (86%) but few (21%) were very/extremely familiar with overdose prevention strategies and just over half (57%) were comfortable/very comfortable counseling about overdose prevention. There was wide variability in utilization of harm reduction/treatment strategies (7.3% frequently providing fentanyl test kits to 70% frequently prescribing naloxone). Higher levels of comfort and familiarity with overdose prevention were associated with more frequent counseling on harm reduction strategies. Pediatric-only clinicians had less familiarity (5% very/extremely familiar) and comfort (35% comfortable/very comfortable) with overdose prevention, and limited use of harm reduction strategies (0%-31% using each strategy frequently).

Conclusions: While clinicians had knowledge and awareness of NPF and rated overdose prevention as highly important, utilization of harm reduction and treatment strategies was variable. This study highlights opportunities for education and system-based support to improve clinician-driven harm reduction practices for patients at risk of overdose.

了解临床医生对非药物芬太尼和减低伤害的认识、态度和做法。
背景:非药物芬太尼(NPF)正在推动阿片类药物过量致死的全国性流行。临床医生可以发挥作用,提高人们对这一日益增长的风险的认识,并采取干预措施降低死亡率。然而,对临床医生有关 NPF 和减低伤害策略的知识、态度和实践进行评估的研究却很有限:方法:设计了一项包含 34 个问题的调查,以评估一家学术医疗中心的成人和儿科医院及急诊临床医生对 NPF 和减低伤害策略的相关知识、态度和实践。调查结果采用描述性统计进行总结。采用卡方检验和菲舍尔精确检验对各组进行比较:共收到 136 份调查回复。大多数受访者(88%)正确回答了有关 NPF 效力的问题。大多数受访者都知道,对于使用非法阿片类药物的人来说,接触 NPF 的可能性非常大(84%)或比较大(10%),而对于非阿片类药物来说,接触 NPF 的可能性非常大(44%)或比较大(46%)。受访者认为预防用药过量对于使用非法阿片类药物(93%)和非阿片类药物(86%)的患者非常重要,但很少(21%)受访者非常/极其熟悉用药过量预防策略,只有一半多(57%)受访者能够/非常自如地进行用药过量预防咨询。在利用减少伤害/治疗策略方面存在很大差异(从 7.3% 经常提供芬太尼检测试剂盒到 70% 经常开纳洛酮处方)。对预防用药过量的舒适度和熟悉程度越高,对减低伤害策略的咨询就越频繁。纯儿科临床医生对预防用药过量的熟悉程度(5% 非常熟悉/非常熟悉)和舒适程度(35% 舒适/非常舒适)较低,对减低伤害策略的使用也有限(0%-31% 经常使用每种策略):虽然临床医生对 NPF 有一定的了解和认识,并认为预防用药过量非常重要,但对减低伤害和治疗策略的使用却不尽相同。这项研究强调了教育和基于系统的支持的机会,以改善临床医生针对有用药过量风险的患者采取的减低伤害措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信