Refluxing versus Non-Refluxing Ureteric Implantation in Continent Cutaneous Urinary Diversion: A Propensity-Scored Comparison regarding Long-Term Renal, Metabolic, and Functional Outcomes of Patients with Ileocecal Pouch.
{"title":"Refluxing versus Non-Refluxing Ureteric Implantation in Continent Cutaneous Urinary Diversion: A Propensity-Scored Comparison regarding Long-Term Renal, Metabolic, and Functional Outcomes of Patients with Ileocecal Pouch.","authors":"Marcel Schwinger, Anna Katharina Seitz, Hubert Kübler, Arkadius Kocot, Hubertus Riedmiller, Charis Kalogirou","doi":"10.1159/000540096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies comparing refluxing versus non-refluxing ureteric implantation in continent cutaneous urinary diversion (CCUD) are scarce and often characterized by heterogeneous study populations. This work therefore aimed at comparing both techniques regarding long-term outcomes in a propensity-scored approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified n = 19 patients, totaling n = 38 renal units (RU), who underwent CCUD surgery at our hospital out of a pool of 120 patients. Of these 38 RU, 27 RU were implanted via refluxing ureteric implantation utilizing various procedures due to special intraoperative circumstances (short ureters, damage due to radiation). In terms of preoperative renal function, a comorbidity index (Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index [ACCI]), and gender, we compared them to n = 38 patients with a total of 76 RU with non-refluxing ureteric implantation in all RU (1:2 matching). The mean follow-up was 56 (IQR: 23-112) months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-term renal function was comparable in CCUD patients receiving refluxing versus non-refluxing ureteric implantation (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 63.11 mL/min vs. 71.7 mL/min, p = 0.22) with an average decline of 17.4 mL/min and 13.69 mL/min during the follow-up period, respectively. Also, the rate of new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) (both 15%, p = 1), the need for alkalizing medication, or the number of pyelonephritis episodes did not significantly differ between the groups. In Cox regression analysis, ACCI was the single most predictive parameter for the development of new-onset CKD (HR: 1.71 [1.10-2.66], p = 0.0167). None of the RU in the refluxing group needed revisional surgery concerning the ureterointestinal anastomosis, whereas 7 RU of the non-refluxing group did.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study confirms that refluxing ureteric implantation in CCUDs is a valid and safe procedure regarding long-term renal, metabolic and functional outcomes. Our data also suggest that patients should be counseled according to their comorbidities regarding long-term renal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Studies comparing refluxing versus non-refluxing ureteric implantation in continent cutaneous urinary diversion (CCUD) are scarce and often characterized by heterogeneous study populations. This work therefore aimed at comparing both techniques regarding long-term outcomes in a propensity-scored approach.
Methods: We identified n = 19 patients, totaling n = 38 renal units (RU), who underwent CCUD surgery at our hospital out of a pool of 120 patients. Of these 38 RU, 27 RU were implanted via refluxing ureteric implantation utilizing various procedures due to special intraoperative circumstances (short ureters, damage due to radiation). In terms of preoperative renal function, a comorbidity index (Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index [ACCI]), and gender, we compared them to n = 38 patients with a total of 76 RU with non-refluxing ureteric implantation in all RU (1:2 matching). The mean follow-up was 56 (IQR: 23-112) months.
Results: Long-term renal function was comparable in CCUD patients receiving refluxing versus non-refluxing ureteric implantation (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 63.11 mL/min vs. 71.7 mL/min, p = 0.22) with an average decline of 17.4 mL/min and 13.69 mL/min during the follow-up period, respectively. Also, the rate of new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) (both 15%, p = 1), the need for alkalizing medication, or the number of pyelonephritis episodes did not significantly differ between the groups. In Cox regression analysis, ACCI was the single most predictive parameter for the development of new-onset CKD (HR: 1.71 [1.10-2.66], p = 0.0167). None of the RU in the refluxing group needed revisional surgery concerning the ureterointestinal anastomosis, whereas 7 RU of the non-refluxing group did.
Conclusions: Our study confirms that refluxing ureteric implantation in CCUDs is a valid and safe procedure regarding long-term renal, metabolic and functional outcomes. Our data also suggest that patients should be counseled according to their comorbidities regarding long-term renal function.
期刊介绍:
Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.