Development of a peer-delivered primary care intervention to improve veteran mental health treatment engagement.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jocelyn E Remmert, LiaJo Destefano, Matthew Chinman, David W Oslin, Shahrzad Mavandadi
{"title":"Development of a peer-delivered primary care intervention to improve veteran mental health treatment engagement.","authors":"Jocelyn E Remmert, LiaJo Destefano, Matthew Chinman, David W Oslin, Shahrzad Mavandadi","doi":"10.1037/ser0000883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Veteran engagement in mental health treatment (MHT) remains low. Peer specialists (PS) are well positioned to implement interventions addressing barriers to MHT engagement, given their familiarity with the process. This study aimed to develop and assess the acceptability of a primary care-based, PS-delivered intervention to improve MHT initiation. Aim 1 utilized modified Delphi methods with a committee of 12 stakeholders (e.g., PS, psychologists, and veteran patients) who provided input on the proposed PS-delivered MHT engagement intervention. The proposed intervention components included questionnaires to identify barriers to engagement and targeted strategies for the barriers (e.g., motivational interviewing, cognitive restructuring). Aim 2 consisted of qualitative interviews with veterans entering MHT, focused on acceptability and feasibility, and gathered additional feedback for the intervention drafted in Aim 1. PS in primary care also reviewed the intervention and provided feedback. Results from Aim 1 demonstrated the acceptability of PS utilizing questionnaires in their work with Veterans, emphasized the importance of rapport building, and provided consensus on the identification of tailored treatment strategies. Veterans entering MHT (<i>n</i> = 9) reported that they were excited about the option of PS being involved in treatment engagement. PS (<i>n</i> = 18) also reported the overall acceptability of the intervention and provided feedback impacting the implementation of the intervention. Incorporating primary care PS into MHT engagement is acceptable. This study serves as the first step in developing a PS-delivered intervention to improve engagement in veteran MHT with input from a diverse group of stakeholders. Implications and future directions will be explored. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Veteran engagement in mental health treatment (MHT) remains low. Peer specialists (PS) are well positioned to implement interventions addressing barriers to MHT engagement, given their familiarity with the process. This study aimed to develop and assess the acceptability of a primary care-based, PS-delivered intervention to improve MHT initiation. Aim 1 utilized modified Delphi methods with a committee of 12 stakeholders (e.g., PS, psychologists, and veteran patients) who provided input on the proposed PS-delivered MHT engagement intervention. The proposed intervention components included questionnaires to identify barriers to engagement and targeted strategies for the barriers (e.g., motivational interviewing, cognitive restructuring). Aim 2 consisted of qualitative interviews with veterans entering MHT, focused on acceptability and feasibility, and gathered additional feedback for the intervention drafted in Aim 1. PS in primary care also reviewed the intervention and provided feedback. Results from Aim 1 demonstrated the acceptability of PS utilizing questionnaires in their work with Veterans, emphasized the importance of rapport building, and provided consensus on the identification of tailored treatment strategies. Veterans entering MHT (n = 9) reported that they were excited about the option of PS being involved in treatment engagement. PS (n = 18) also reported the overall acceptability of the intervention and provided feedback impacting the implementation of the intervention. Incorporating primary care PS into MHT engagement is acceptable. This study serves as the first step in developing a PS-delivered intervention to improve engagement in veteran MHT with input from a diverse group of stakeholders. Implications and future directions will be explored. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

开发由同伴提供的初级保健干预措施,以提高退伍军人的心理健康治疗参与度。
退伍军人参与心理健康治疗(MHT)的比例仍然很低。鉴于同伴专家(PS)对心理健康治疗过程的熟悉程度,他们完全有能力实施干预措施来解决心理健康治疗过程中的障碍。本研究旨在开发和评估基于初级保健、由同伴专家提供的干预措施的可接受性,以改善 MHT 的启动。目的 1 采用了改良德尔菲法,由 12 名利益相关者(如 PS、心理学家和退伍军人患者)组成的委员会就建议的 PS 提供的 MHT 参与干预提供了意见。建议的干预内容包括调查问卷,以确定参与障碍和针对障碍的策略(如动机访谈、认知重组)。目标 2 包括对进入 MHT 的退伍军人进行定性访谈,重点关注可接受性和可行性,并为目标 1 中起草的干预措施收集更多反馈意见。初级保健中的 PS 也审查了干预措施并提供了反馈意见。目标 1 的结果表明,PS 在与退伍军人的合作中使用问卷调查的可接受性,强调了建立融洽关系的重要性,并就确定量身定制的治疗策略达成了共识。接受心理治疗的退伍军人(9 人)表示,他们对心理医生参与治疗的选择感到兴奋。PS(n = 18)还报告了干预措施的总体可接受性,并提供了影响干预措施实施的反馈意见。将初级保健 PS 纳入 MHT 参与是可以接受的。本研究是开发由 PS 提供的干预措施的第一步,目的是在不同利益相关者的参与下提高退伍军人 MHT 的参与度。本研究将探讨其意义和未来发展方向。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信