Dual-Task Performance and Brain Morphologic Characteristics in Parkinson's Disease.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sarah J Carlson, Yi-Fang Chiu, Merrill R Landers, Nora E Fritz, Virendra R Mishra, Jason K Longhurst
{"title":"Dual-Task Performance and Brain Morphologic Characteristics in Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Sarah J Carlson, Yi-Fang Chiu, Merrill R Landers, Nora E Fritz, Virendra R Mishra, Jason K Longhurst","doi":"10.1159/000540393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) reduces an individual's capacity for automaticity which limits their ability to perform two tasks simultaneously, negatively impacting daily function. Understanding the neural correlates of dual tasks (DTs) may pave the way for targeted therapies. To better understand automaticity in PD, we aimed to explore whether individuals with differing DT performances possessed differences in brain morphologic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from 34 individuals with PD and 47 healthy older adults including (1) demographics (age, sex), (2) disease severity (Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], Hoehn and Yahr, levodopa equivalent daily dose [LEDD]), (3) cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), (4) LEDD, (5) single-task and DT performance during a DT-timed-up-and-go test utilizing a serial subtraction task, and (6) cortical thicknesses and subcortical volumes obtained from volumetric MRI. Participants were categorized as low or high DT performers if their combined DT effect was greater than the previously determined mean value for healthy older adults (μ = -74.2). Nonparametric testing using Quade's ANCOVA was conducted to compare cortical thicknesses and brain volumes between the highDT and lowDT groups while controlling for covariates: age, sex, MDS-UPDRS part III, LEDD, and intracranial volume. Secondarily, similar comparisons were made between the healthy older adult group and the highDT and lowDT groups. Lastly, a hierarchical linear regression model was conducted regressing combined DT effect on covariates (block one) and cortical thicknesses (block 2) in stepwise fashion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highDT group had thicker cortices than the lowDT group in the right primary somatosensory cortex (p = 0.001), bilateral primary motor cortices (p ≤ 0.001, left; p = 0.002, right), bilateral supplementary motor areas (p = 0.001, left; p &lt; 0.001, right), and mean of the bilateral hemispheres (p = 0.001, left; p &lt; 0.001, right). Of note, left primary cortex thickness (p = 0.002), left prefrontal cortex thickness (p &lt; 0.001), and right supplementary motor area thickness (p = 0.003) differed when adding a healthy comparison group. Additionally, the regression analysis found that the left paracentral lobule thickness explained 20.8% of the variability in combined DT effect (p = 0.011) beyond the influence of covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest regions underlying DT performance, specifically, a convergence of neural control relying on sensorimotor integration, motor planning, and motor activation to achieve higher levels of DT performance for individuals with PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19115,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) reduces an individual's capacity for automaticity which limits their ability to perform two tasks simultaneously, negatively impacting daily function. Understanding the neural correlates of dual tasks (DTs) may pave the way for targeted therapies. To better understand automaticity in PD, we aimed to explore whether individuals with differing DT performances possessed differences in brain morphologic characteristics.

Methods: Data were obtained from 34 individuals with PD and 47 healthy older adults including (1) demographics (age, sex), (2) disease severity (Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], Hoehn and Yahr, levodopa equivalent daily dose [LEDD]), (3) cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), (4) LEDD, (5) single-task and DT performance during a DT-timed-up-and-go test utilizing a serial subtraction task, and (6) cortical thicknesses and subcortical volumes obtained from volumetric MRI. Participants were categorized as low or high DT performers if their combined DT effect was greater than the previously determined mean value for healthy older adults (μ = -74.2). Nonparametric testing using Quade's ANCOVA was conducted to compare cortical thicknesses and brain volumes between the highDT and lowDT groups while controlling for covariates: age, sex, MDS-UPDRS part III, LEDD, and intracranial volume. Secondarily, similar comparisons were made between the healthy older adult group and the highDT and lowDT groups. Lastly, a hierarchical linear regression model was conducted regressing combined DT effect on covariates (block one) and cortical thicknesses (block 2) in stepwise fashion.

Results: The highDT group had thicker cortices than the lowDT group in the right primary somatosensory cortex (p = 0.001), bilateral primary motor cortices (p ≤ 0.001, left; p = 0.002, right), bilateral supplementary motor areas (p = 0.001, left; p < 0.001, right), and mean of the bilateral hemispheres (p = 0.001, left; p < 0.001, right). Of note, left primary cortex thickness (p = 0.002), left prefrontal cortex thickness (p < 0.001), and right supplementary motor area thickness (p = 0.003) differed when adding a healthy comparison group. Additionally, the regression analysis found that the left paracentral lobule thickness explained 20.8% of the variability in combined DT effect (p = 0.011) beyond the influence of covariates.

Conclusions: These results suggest regions underlying DT performance, specifically, a convergence of neural control relying on sensorimotor integration, motor planning, and motor activation to achieve higher levels of DT performance for individuals with PD.

帕金森病患者的双重任务表现和大脑形态特征。
导言 帕金森病(PD)会降低患者的自动能力,从而限制他们同时完成两项任务的能力,对日常功能产生负面影响。了解双任务(DT)的神经相关性可为靶向治疗铺平道路。为了更好地了解帕金森病患者的自动性,我们旨在探索具有不同 DT 表现的个体是否在大脑形态特征上存在差异。方法 我们从 34 名帕金森病患者和 47 名健康老年人那里获得了数据,包括1) 人口统计学特征(年龄、性别);2) 疾病严重程度(运动障碍协会-统一帕金森病评定量表(MDS-UPDRS)、Hoehn &;Yahr、左旋多巴等效日剂量 (LEDD));3)认知能力(蒙特利尔认知评估);4)左旋多巴等效日剂量;5)在利用连续牵引任务进行的 DT-定时-上-走测试中的单项任务和 DT-表现;6)从容积核磁共振成像中获得的皮质厚度和皮质下体积。如果参与者的综合 DT 效应大于先前确定的健康老年人的平均值(μ=74.2),则被归类为低 DT 效应或高 DT 效应者。在控制年龄、性别、MDS-UPDRS 第三部分、LEDD 和颅内容积等协变量的情况下,使用奎德方差分析对高 DT 组和低 DT 组的皮质厚度和脑容量进行了非参数检验。其次,在健康老年人组与高DT组和低DT组之间进行了类似的比较。最后,采用分层线性回归模型,将 DT 的综合效应与协变量(第一区块)和皮质厚度(第二区块)进行逐步回归。结果 在右侧初级躯体感觉区(p=0.001)、双侧初级运动区(p=<0.001,左侧;p=0.002,右侧)、双侧辅助运动区(p=0.001,左侧;p<0.001,右侧)和双侧大脑半球平均区(p=0.001,左侧;p<0.001,右侧),高DT组的皮层厚度均高于低DT组。值得注意的是,在加入健康对比组后,左侧初级皮层厚度(p=0.002)、左侧前额叶皮层厚度(p<0.001)和右侧辅助运动区厚度(p=0.003)均有所不同。此外,回归分析发现,左侧旁中心小叶厚度可解释 20.8% 的综合 DT 效应变异(p=0.011),而不受协变因素的影响。结论 这些结果表明了双任务表现的基础区域;具体来说,神经控制的融合依赖于感觉运动整合、运动规划和运动激活,从而使帕金森病患者获得更高水平的 DT 表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Neurodegenerative Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neurodegenerative Diseases'' is a bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal for the publication of advances in the understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer''s disease, Parkinson''s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington''s disease and related neurological and psychiatric disorders.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信