Spontaneous instrumental approach-avoidance learning in social contexts in autism.

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Morgan Beaurenaut, Klara Kovarski, Constance Destais, Rocco Mennella, Julie Grèzes
{"title":"Spontaneous instrumental approach-avoidance learning in social contexts in autism.","authors":"Morgan Beaurenaut, Klara Kovarski, Constance Destais, Rocco Mennella, Julie Grèzes","doi":"10.1186/s13229-024-00610-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC) are characterized by atypicalities in social interactions, compared to Typically Developing individuals (TD). The social motivation theory posits that these difficulties stem from diminished anticipation, reception, and/or learning from social rewards. Although learning from socioemotional outcomes is core to the theory, studies to date have been sparse and inconsistent. This possibly arises from a combination of theoretical, methodological and sample-related issues. Here, we assessed participants' ability to develop a spontaneous preference for actions that lead to desirable socioemotional outcomes (approaching/avoiding of happy/angry individuals, respectively), in an ecologically valid social scenario. We expected that learning abilities would be impaired in ASC individuals, particularly in response to affiliative social feedback.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We ran an online social reinforcement learning task, on two large online cohorts with (n = 274) and without (n = 290) ASC, matched for gender, age and education. Participants had to indicate where they would sit in a waiting room. Each seat was associated with different probabilities of approaching/avoiding emotional individuals. Importantly, the task was implicit, as participants were not instructed to learn, and emotional expressions were never mentioned. We applied both categorical analyses contrasting the ASC and TD groups and dimensional factor analysis on affective questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrary to our hypothesis, participants showed spontaneous learning from socioemotional outcomes, regardless of their diagnostic group. Yet, when accounting for dimensional variations in autistic traits, as well as depression and anxiety, two main findings emerged among females who failed to develop explicit learning strategies: (1) autism severity in ASC correlated with reduced learning to approach happy individuals; (2) anxiety-depression severity across both ASC and TD participants correlated with reduced learning to approach/avoid happy/angry individuals, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implicit spontaneous learning from socioemotional outcomes is not generally impaired in autism but may be specifically associated with autism severity in females with ASC, when they do not have an explicit strategy for adapting to their social environment. Clinical diagnosis and intervention ought to take into account individual differences in their full complexity, including the presence of co-morbid anxiety and depression, when dealing with social atypicalities in autism.</p>","PeriodicalId":18733,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Autism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Autism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-024-00610-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC) are characterized by atypicalities in social interactions, compared to Typically Developing individuals (TD). The social motivation theory posits that these difficulties stem from diminished anticipation, reception, and/or learning from social rewards. Although learning from socioemotional outcomes is core to the theory, studies to date have been sparse and inconsistent. This possibly arises from a combination of theoretical, methodological and sample-related issues. Here, we assessed participants' ability to develop a spontaneous preference for actions that lead to desirable socioemotional outcomes (approaching/avoiding of happy/angry individuals, respectively), in an ecologically valid social scenario. We expected that learning abilities would be impaired in ASC individuals, particularly in response to affiliative social feedback.

Method: We ran an online social reinforcement learning task, on two large online cohorts with (n = 274) and without (n = 290) ASC, matched for gender, age and education. Participants had to indicate where they would sit in a waiting room. Each seat was associated with different probabilities of approaching/avoiding emotional individuals. Importantly, the task was implicit, as participants were not instructed to learn, and emotional expressions were never mentioned. We applied both categorical analyses contrasting the ASC and TD groups and dimensional factor analysis on affective questionnaires.

Results: Contrary to our hypothesis, participants showed spontaneous learning from socioemotional outcomes, regardless of their diagnostic group. Yet, when accounting for dimensional variations in autistic traits, as well as depression and anxiety, two main findings emerged among females who failed to develop explicit learning strategies: (1) autism severity in ASC correlated with reduced learning to approach happy individuals; (2) anxiety-depression severity across both ASC and TD participants correlated with reduced learning to approach/avoid happy/angry individuals, respectively.

Conclusions: Implicit spontaneous learning from socioemotional outcomes is not generally impaired in autism but may be specifically associated with autism severity in females with ASC, when they do not have an explicit strategy for adapting to their social environment. Clinical diagnosis and intervention ought to take into account individual differences in their full complexity, including the presence of co-morbid anxiety and depression, when dealing with social atypicalities in autism.

自闭症患者在社交环境中的自发工具性接近-回避学习。
背景:与发育正常的个体(TD)相比,自闭症谱系障碍(ASC)患者在社会交往方面具有非典型特征。社会动机理论认为,这些困难源于对社会奖励的预期、接受和/或学习能力的减弱。虽然从社会情感结果中学习是该理论的核心,但迄今为止的研究却很少,而且不一致。这可能是理论、方法和样本相关问题的综合结果。在这里,我们评估了参与者在生态学上有效的社会情景中自发偏好能带来理想社会情感结果(分别接近/避开高兴/愤怒的个体)的行动的能力。我们预计ASC患者的学习能力会受损,尤其是在对附属性社会反馈做出反应时:我们在性别、年龄和教育程度相匹配的两个大型在线群体中,分别测试了患有(n = 274)和不患有(n = 290)ASC 的人的在线社交强化学习任务。参与者必须指出他们在候车室的座位。每个座位都与接近/回避情绪化个体的不同概率相关联。重要的是,这项任务是隐性的,因为参与者没有被要求学习,也从未提及情绪表达。我们对ASC组和TD组进行了分类分析,并对情感问卷进行了维度因素分析:结果:与我们的假设相反,无论受试者属于哪个诊断组,他们都能自发地从社会情感结果中学习。然而,当考虑到自闭症特征以及抑郁和焦虑的维度差异时,在未能发展出明确学习策略的女性中出现了两个主要发现:(1)自闭症患者的自闭症严重程度与接近快乐个体的学习能力降低相关;(2)自闭症患者和TD参与者的焦虑抑郁严重程度分别与接近/回避快乐/愤怒个体的学习能力降低相关:结论:自闭症患者对社会情感结果的内隐自发学习一般不会受损,但对于患有自闭症的女性患者来说,当她们没有明确的适应社会环境的策略时,内隐自发学习可能与自闭症的严重程度特别相关。在处理自闭症社交异常时,临床诊断和干预应充分考虑个体差异的复杂性,包括是否合并焦虑和抑郁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Autism
Molecular Autism GENETICS & HEREDITY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Autism is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes high-quality basic, translational and clinical research that has relevance to the etiology, pathobiology, or treatment of autism and related neurodevelopmental conditions. Research that includes integration across levels is encouraged. Molecular Autism publishes empirical studies, reviews, and brief communications.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信