Interpretation of acid-base metabolism on arterial blood gas samples via machine learning algorithms.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s11845-024-03767-6
Habib Ozdemir, Muhammed Ikbal Sasmaz, Ramazan Guven, Akkan Avci
{"title":"Interpretation of acid-base metabolism on arterial blood gas samples via machine learning algorithms.","authors":"Habib Ozdemir, Muhammed Ikbal Sasmaz, Ramazan Guven, Akkan Avci","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03767-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arterial blood gas evaluation is crucial for critically ill patients, as it provides essential information about acid-base metabolism and respiratory balance, but evaluation can be complex and time-consuming. Artificial intelligence can perform tasks that require human intelligence, and it is revolutionizing healthcare through technological advancements.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess arterial blood gas evaluation using artificial intelligence algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 21.541 retrospective arterial blood gas samples, categorized into 15 different classes by experts for evaluating acid-base metabolism status. Six machine learning algorithms were utilized; accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 values of the models were determined; and ROC curves were drawn to assess areas under the curve for each class. Evaluation of which sample was estimated in which class was conducted using the confusion matrices of the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bagging classifier (BC) model achieved the highest balanced accuracy with 99.24%, whereas the XGBoost model reached the highest accuracy with 99.66%. The BC model shows 100% sensitivity for nine classes and 100% specificity for 10 classes, and the model correctly predicted 6438 of 6463 test samples and achieved an accuracy of 99.61%, with an area under the curve > 0.9 in all classes on a class basis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The machine learning models developed exhibited remarkable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting the status of acid-base metabolism. However, implementing these models can aid clinicians, freeing up their time for more intricate tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"277-287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03767-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arterial blood gas evaluation is crucial for critically ill patients, as it provides essential information about acid-base metabolism and respiratory balance, but evaluation can be complex and time-consuming. Artificial intelligence can perform tasks that require human intelligence, and it is revolutionizing healthcare through technological advancements.

Aim: This study aims to assess arterial blood gas evaluation using artificial intelligence algorithms.

Methods: The study included 21.541 retrospective arterial blood gas samples, categorized into 15 different classes by experts for evaluating acid-base metabolism status. Six machine learning algorithms were utilized; accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 values of the models were determined; and ROC curves were drawn to assess areas under the curve for each class. Evaluation of which sample was estimated in which class was conducted using the confusion matrices of the models.

Results: The bagging classifier (BC) model achieved the highest balanced accuracy with 99.24%, whereas the XGBoost model reached the highest accuracy with 99.66%. The BC model shows 100% sensitivity for nine classes and 100% specificity for 10 classes, and the model correctly predicted 6438 of 6463 test samples and achieved an accuracy of 99.61%, with an area under the curve > 0.9 in all classes on a class basis.

Conclusion: The machine learning models developed exhibited remarkable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting the status of acid-base metabolism. However, implementing these models can aid clinicians, freeing up their time for more intricate tasks.

Abstract Image

通过机器学习算法解读动脉血气样本的酸碱代谢。
背景:动脉血气评估对重症患者至关重要,因为它提供了有关酸碱代谢和呼吸平衡的重要信息,但评估工作可能既复杂又耗时。人工智能可以完成需要人类智能才能完成的任务,它正在通过技术进步为医疗保健带来革命性的变化。目的:本研究旨在评估使用人工智能算法进行的动脉血气评估:研究纳入了 21 541 份回顾性动脉血气样本,由专家将其分为 15 个不同类别,用于评估酸碱代谢状态。研究采用了六种机器学习算法,确定了模型的准确度、平衡准确度、灵敏度、特异性、精确度和 F1 值,并绘制了 ROC 曲线以评估每个类别的曲线下面积。使用模型的混淆矩阵评估哪个样本被归入哪个类别:装袋分类器(BC)模型的平衡准确率最高,达到 99.24%,而 XGBoost 模型的准确率最高,达到 99.66%。BC 模型对 9 个类别显示出 100%的灵敏度,对 10 个类别显示出 100%的特异性,该模型对 6463 个测试样本中的 6438 个样本进行了正确预测,准确率达到 99.61%,所有类别的曲线下面积均大于 0.9:结论:所开发的机器学习模型在预测酸碱代谢状况方面具有出色的准确性、灵敏度和特异性。然而,实施这些模型可以帮助临床医生,让他们腾出时间处理更复杂的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信