Predicting angiographic coronary artery disease using machine learning and high-frequency QRS.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Jiajia Zhang, Heng Zhang, Ting Wei, Pinfang Kang, Bi Tang, Hongju Wang
{"title":"Predicting angiographic coronary artery disease using machine learning and high-frequency QRS.","authors":"Jiajia Zhang, Heng Zhang, Ting Wei, Pinfang Kang, Bi Tang, Hongju Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02620-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Exercise stress ECG is a common diagnostic test for stable coronary artery disease, but its sensitivity and specificity need to be further improved. In this paper, we construct a machine learning model for the prediction of angiographic coronary artery disease by HFQRS analysis of cycling exercise ECG.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This study prospectively included 140 inpatients and 59 healthy volunteers undergoing cycling exercise ECG. The CHD group (N=104) and non-CHD group (N=95) were determined by coronary angiography gold standard. Automated HF QRS analysis was performed by the blinded method. The coronary group was predominantly male, with a higher prevalence of age, BMI, hypertension, and diabetes than the non-coronary group ( <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ), higher lipid levels in the coronary group ( <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.005</mn></mrow> </math> ), significantly longer QRS duration during exercise testing ( <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.005</mn></mrow> </math> ), more positive leads ( <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ), and a greater proportion of significant changes in HFQRS ( <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ). Age, Gender, Hypertension, Diabetes, and HF QRS Conclusions were screened by correlation analysis and multifactorial retrospective analysis to construct the machine learning models of the XGBoost Classifier, Logistic Regression, LightGBM Classifier, RandomForest Classifier, Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male, elderly, with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and positive exercise stress test HFQRS conclusions suggested a high risk of CHD. The best performance of the Logistic Regression model was compared, and a column line graph for assessing the risk of CHD was further developed and validated.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02620-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Exercise stress ECG is a common diagnostic test for stable coronary artery disease, but its sensitivity and specificity need to be further improved. In this paper, we construct a machine learning model for the prediction of angiographic coronary artery disease by HFQRS analysis of cycling exercise ECG.

Methods and results: This study prospectively included 140 inpatients and 59 healthy volunteers undergoing cycling exercise ECG. The CHD group (N=104) and non-CHD group (N=95) were determined by coronary angiography gold standard. Automated HF QRS analysis was performed by the blinded method. The coronary group was predominantly male, with a higher prevalence of age, BMI, hypertension, and diabetes than the non-coronary group ( P < 0.001 ), higher lipid levels in the coronary group ( P < 0.005 ), significantly longer QRS duration during exercise testing ( P < 0.005 ), more positive leads ( P < 0.001 ), and a greater proportion of significant changes in HFQRS ( P < 0.001 ). Age, Gender, Hypertension, Diabetes, and HF QRS Conclusions were screened by correlation analysis and multifactorial retrospective analysis to construct the machine learning models of the XGBoost Classifier, Logistic Regression, LightGBM Classifier, RandomForest Classifier, Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine, respectively.

Conclusion: Male, elderly, with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and positive exercise stress test HFQRS conclusions suggested a high risk of CHD. The best performance of the Logistic Regression model was compared, and a column line graph for assessing the risk of CHD was further developed and validated.

利用机器学习和高频 QRS 预测血管造影冠状动脉疾病。
目的:运动负荷心电图是诊断稳定型冠状动脉疾病的常用方法,但其敏感性和特异性有待进一步提高。本文通过对骑车运动心电图进行高频QRS分析,构建了一个预测血管造影冠状动脉疾病的机器学习模型:本研究前瞻性地纳入了 140 名住院患者和 59 名健康志愿者,他们都接受了骑车运动心电图检查。通过冠状动脉造影金标准确定了冠心病组(104 人)和非冠心病组(95 人)。高频 QRS 自动分析采用盲法进行。冠心病组以男性为主,年龄、体重指数、高血压和糖尿病患病率均高于非冠心病组(P 0.001),冠心病组血脂水平更高(P 0.005),运动测试时 QRS 持续时间明显更长(P 0.005),正导联更多 (P 0.001),HFQRS 发生显著变化的比例更高(P 0.001)。通过相关分析和多因素回顾分析筛选出年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病和HF QRS结论,分别构建了XGBoost分类器、Logistic回归、LightGBM分类器、RandomForest分类器、人工神经网络和支持向量机等机器学习模型:男性、老年人、高血压、糖尿病和运动负荷试验 HFQRS 阳性结论均提示其罹患冠心病的风险较高。比较了逻辑回归模型的最佳性能,并进一步开发和验证了用于评估冠心病风险的柱状线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信