Expert CONsensus on Visual Evaluation in Retinal disease manaGEment: the CONVERGE study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Roger S Anderson, Mark Roark, Rose Gilbert, Dayyanah Sumodhee
{"title":"Expert CONsensus on Visual Evaluation in Retinal disease manaGEment: the CONVERGE study.","authors":"Roger S Anderson, Mark Roark, Rose Gilbert, Dayyanah Sumodhee","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-325310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Recent decades have seen significant advances in both structural and functional testing of retinal disease. However, the current clinical value of specific testing modalities, as well as future trends, need to be clearly identified in order to highlight areas for further development in routine care and clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a modified two-round Delphi study to obtain the opinion of a multidisciplinary group of 33 international experts involved in the field of retinal disease management/research to determine the level of agreement and consensus regarding the value and performance of specific structural and functional testing methods for retinal disease. On a Likert scale, a median of 1-2 indicated disagreement with the statement, and 5-6 indicated agreement with the statement. An IQR of ≤2 indicated consensus in the responses. Several questions also allowed comments on responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was overall agreement that structural testing currently predominates for detection and monitoring. There was moderate agreement that functional testing remains important and will continue to do so in the future because it provides complementary information. Certain respondents considered that properly designed and applied psychophysical tests are as reliable and repeatable as structural observations and that functional changes are the most important in the long run. Respondents considered future care and research to require a combination of structural and functional testing with strong consensus that the relative importance will depend on disease type and stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study obtained important insights from a group of international experts regarding current and future needs in the management of retinal disease using a mix of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Responses provide a rich range of opinions that will be of interest to researchers seeking to design tests for future patient care and clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Recent decades have seen significant advances in both structural and functional testing of retinal disease. However, the current clinical value of specific testing modalities, as well as future trends, need to be clearly identified in order to highlight areas for further development in routine care and clinical trials.

Methods: We designed a modified two-round Delphi study to obtain the opinion of a multidisciplinary group of 33 international experts involved in the field of retinal disease management/research to determine the level of agreement and consensus regarding the value and performance of specific structural and functional testing methods for retinal disease. On a Likert scale, a median of 1-2 indicated disagreement with the statement, and 5-6 indicated agreement with the statement. An IQR of ≤2 indicated consensus in the responses. Several questions also allowed comments on responses.

Results: There was overall agreement that structural testing currently predominates for detection and monitoring. There was moderate agreement that functional testing remains important and will continue to do so in the future because it provides complementary information. Certain respondents considered that properly designed and applied psychophysical tests are as reliable and repeatable as structural observations and that functional changes are the most important in the long run. Respondents considered future care and research to require a combination of structural and functional testing with strong consensus that the relative importance will depend on disease type and stage.

Conclusion: The study obtained important insights from a group of international experts regarding current and future needs in the management of retinal disease using a mix of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Responses provide a rich range of opinions that will be of interest to researchers seeking to design tests for future patient care and clinical trials.

视网膜疾病管理中的视觉评估专家共识:CONVERGE 研究。
背景/目的:近几十年来,视网膜疾病的结构和功能检测都取得了重大进展。然而,特定检测方式目前的临床价值以及未来的发展趋势需要明确确定,以便突出在常规护理和临床试验中进一步发展的领域:我们设计了一项经过修改的两轮德尔菲研究,以征求由 33 位视网膜疾病管理/研究领域的国际专家组成的多学科小组的意见,从而确定各方对视网膜疾病的特定结构和功能检测方法的价值和性能的一致意见和共识程度。采用李克特量表,中位数为 1-2 表示不同意该声明,5-6 表示同意该声明。IQR≤2表示答案一致。有几个问题还允许对回答进行评论:结果:总体上一致认为,目前结构性检测主要用于检测和监测。答复者基本同意功能测试仍然重要,并将在未来继续如此,因为它能提供补充信息。一些受访者认为,心理物理测试设计和应用得当,与结构观察一样可靠和可重复,从长远看,功能变化是最重要的。受访者认为,未来的护理和研究需要将结构和功能测试结合起来,并一致认为其相对重要性将取决于疾病的类型和阶段:这项研究采用定量和定性相结合的方法,从一组国际专家那里获得了关于视网膜疾病管理的当前和未来需求的重要见解。专家们的回答提供了丰富的意见,研究人员在设计用于未来患者护理和临床试验的检测项目时将会对这些意见感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信