Approaches to improving mental healthcare for autistic people: systematic review.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.707
Sofia Loizou, Tamara Pemovska, Theodora Stefanidou, Una Foye, Ruth Cooper, Ariana Kular, Anna Greenburgh, Helen Baldwin, Jessica Griffiths, Katherine R K Saunders, Phoebe Barnett, Matilda Minchin, Gráinne Brady, Nafiso Ahmed, Jennie Parker, Beverley Chipp, Rachel R Olive, Robin Jackson, Amanda Timmerman, Suzi Sapiets, Eva Driskell, Bethany Parsons, Debbie Spain, Vaso Totsika, Will Mandy, Richard Pender, Philippa Clery, Kylee Trevillion, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Alan Simpson, Sonia Johnson
{"title":"Approaches to improving mental healthcare for autistic people: systematic review.","authors":"Sofia Loizou, Tamara Pemovska, Theodora Stefanidou, Una Foye, Ruth Cooper, Ariana Kular, Anna Greenburgh, Helen Baldwin, Jessica Griffiths, Katherine R K Saunders, Phoebe Barnett, Matilda Minchin, Gráinne Brady, Nafiso Ahmed, Jennie Parker, Beverley Chipp, Rachel R Olive, Robin Jackson, Amanda Timmerman, Suzi Sapiets, Eva Driskell, Bethany Parsons, Debbie Spain, Vaso Totsika, Will Mandy, Richard Pender, Philippa Clery, Kylee Trevillion, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Alan Simpson, Sonia Johnson","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autistic people have a high likelihood of developing mental health difficulties but a low chance of receiving effective mental healthcare. Therefore, there is a need to identify and examine strategies to improve mental healthcare for autistic people.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify strategies that have been implemented to improve access, experiences of care and mental health outcomes for autistic adults, and to examine evidence on their acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A co-produced systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINHAL, medRxiv and PsyArXiv were searched. We included all study designs reporting acceptability or feasibility outcomes and empirical quantitative study designs reporting effectiveness outcomes. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 articles were identified. These included 16 studies of adapted mental health interventions, eight studies of service improvements and six studies of bespoke mental health interventions developed for autistic people. There was no conclusive evidence on effectiveness. However, most bespoke and adapted approaches appeared to be feasible and acceptable. Identified adaptations appeared to be acceptable and feasible, including increasing knowledge and detection of autism, providing environmental adjustments and communication accommodations, accommodating individual differences and modifying the structure and content of interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many identified strategies are feasible and acceptable, and can be readily implemented in services with the potential to make mental healthcare more suitable for autistic people, but important research gaps remain. Future research should address these and investigate a co-produced package of service improvement measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Autistic people have a high likelihood of developing mental health difficulties but a low chance of receiving effective mental healthcare. Therefore, there is a need to identify and examine strategies to improve mental healthcare for autistic people.

Aims: To identify strategies that have been implemented to improve access, experiences of care and mental health outcomes for autistic adults, and to examine evidence on their acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness.

Method: A co-produced systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINHAL, medRxiv and PsyArXiv were searched. We included all study designs reporting acceptability or feasibility outcomes and empirical quantitative study designs reporting effectiveness outcomes. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach.

Results: A total of 30 articles were identified. These included 16 studies of adapted mental health interventions, eight studies of service improvements and six studies of bespoke mental health interventions developed for autistic people. There was no conclusive evidence on effectiveness. However, most bespoke and adapted approaches appeared to be feasible and acceptable. Identified adaptations appeared to be acceptable and feasible, including increasing knowledge and detection of autism, providing environmental adjustments and communication accommodations, accommodating individual differences and modifying the structure and content of interventions.

Conclusion: Many identified strategies are feasible and acceptable, and can be readily implemented in services with the potential to make mental healthcare more suitable for autistic people, but important research gaps remain. Future research should address these and investigate a co-produced package of service improvement measures.

改善自闭症患者心理保健的方法:系统综述。
背景:自闭症患者出现心理健康问题的可能性很高,但接受有效心理保健的机会却很低。因此,有必要确定并研究改善自闭症患者心理保健的策略。目的:确定已实施的策略,以改善自闭症成人的就医途径、就医体验和心理健康结果,并研究其可接受性、可行性和有效性方面的证据:方法:共同编制系统性综述。检索了 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINHAL、medRxiv 和 PsyArXiv。我们纳入了所有报告可接受性或可行性结果的研究设计以及报告有效性结果的经验性定量研究设计。我们采用叙述法对数据进行了综合:结果:共确定了 30 篇文章。其中包括 16 项关于调整心理健康干预措施的研究、8 项关于改善服务的研究以及 6 项关于为自闭症患者定制心理健康干预措施的研究。目前还没有关于有效性的确凿证据。不过,大多数定制和调整的方法似乎都是可行和可以接受的。已确定的调整措施似乎是可接受和可行的,包括增加对自闭症的了解和检测、提供环境调整和沟通便利、适应个体差异以及修改干预措施的结构和内容:结论:许多已确定的策略都是可行和可接受的,并且可以在服务中随时实施,有可能使心理保健更适合自闭症患者,但仍存在重要的研究缺口。未来的研究应解决这些问题,并对共同制定的一揽子服务改进措施进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信