Early contraceptive implant removal and associated factors among women attending public family planning clinics, Mbarara City, Southwestern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Joseph Rwebazibwa, Richard Migisha, Gideon Munaru, Onesmus Byamukama, Lenard Abesiga, Godfrey R Mugyenyi, Paul Kato Kalyebara, Leevan Tibaijuka, Joseph Ngonzi, Rogers Kajabwangu, Stuart Turanzomwe, Fadumo Mohammed, Joy Muhumuza, Agaba David Collins, Yarine Tornes Fajardo, Wasswa G M Ssalongo, Musa Kayondo, Hamson Kanyesigye
{"title":"Early contraceptive implant removal and associated factors among women attending public family planning clinics, Mbarara City, Southwestern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Joseph Rwebazibwa, Richard Migisha, Gideon Munaru, Onesmus Byamukama, Lenard Abesiga, Godfrey R Mugyenyi, Paul Kato Kalyebara, Leevan Tibaijuka, Joseph Ngonzi, Rogers Kajabwangu, Stuart Turanzomwe, Fadumo Mohammed, Joy Muhumuza, Agaba David Collins, Yarine Tornes Fajardo, Wasswa G M Ssalongo, Musa Kayondo, Hamson Kanyesigye","doi":"10.1186/s40834-024-00299-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early implant removal not only results in method wastage and strains healthcare resources but also exposes women to the risk of unplanned pregnancies and associated complications if an alternative contraceptive is not promptly adopted. Studies have demonstrated that prevalence and factors associated with contraceptive use vary across different cultures and regions even within Uganda. We determined the prevalence and associated factors of early implant removal, among women attending public family planning clinics in Mbarara City, southwestern Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to July 2023 at four public family planning clinics in Mbarara City. We consecutively enrolled women and administered a questionnaire to obtain data on demographic, and medical characteristics. We defined early removal as implant discontinuation within a period < 2 years. We excluded women who did not have a written record of the date of insertion of the contraceptive implants. We used modified Poisson regression analysis to determine factors associated with early implant removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 406 women, with a mean age of 29 ± 6 years. The prevalence of early contraceptive implant removal was 53% (n = 210; 95%, CI: 48-58%). Factors associated with early implant removal were experiencing side effects (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.20-2.21), inserting an implant to achieve career goals (aPR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.26-2.81) and intending to use the implant for < 24 months (aPR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11-1.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately half of the surveyed women removed their contraceptive implant early. Women who experienced side effects, chose an implant due to career obligations and those whose intended implant use was < 2 years were more likely to have an early contraceptive implant removal compared to their counterparts. We recommend strengthening of pre- and post- insertion counselling to address concerns among those who may experience side-effects. Women who intend to use implants for < 2 years and those who have career obligations should be encouraged to use short-acting methods as an option.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-024-00299-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early implant removal not only results in method wastage and strains healthcare resources but also exposes women to the risk of unplanned pregnancies and associated complications if an alternative contraceptive is not promptly adopted. Studies have demonstrated that prevalence and factors associated with contraceptive use vary across different cultures and regions even within Uganda. We determined the prevalence and associated factors of early implant removal, among women attending public family planning clinics in Mbarara City, southwestern Uganda.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to July 2023 at four public family planning clinics in Mbarara City. We consecutively enrolled women and administered a questionnaire to obtain data on demographic, and medical characteristics. We defined early removal as implant discontinuation within a period < 2 years. We excluded women who did not have a written record of the date of insertion of the contraceptive implants. We used modified Poisson regression analysis to determine factors associated with early implant removal.

Results: We enrolled 406 women, with a mean age of 29 ± 6 years. The prevalence of early contraceptive implant removal was 53% (n = 210; 95%, CI: 48-58%). Factors associated with early implant removal were experiencing side effects (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.20-2.21), inserting an implant to achieve career goals (aPR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.26-2.81) and intending to use the implant for < 24 months (aPR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11-1.66).

Conclusion: Approximately half of the surveyed women removed their contraceptive implant early. Women who experienced side effects, chose an implant due to career obligations and those whose intended implant use was < 2 years were more likely to have an early contraceptive implant removal compared to their counterparts. We recommend strengthening of pre- and post- insertion counselling to address concerns among those who may experience side-effects. Women who intend to use implants for < 2 years and those who have career obligations should be encouraged to use short-acting methods as an option.

乌干达西南部姆巴拉拉市到公共计划生育诊所就诊的妇女过早取出避孕植入物及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
背景:过早取出皮下埋植剂不仅会造成避孕方法的浪费和医疗资源的紧张,而且如果不及时采用替代避孕药具,妇女还会面临意外怀孕和相关并发症的风险。研究表明,即使在乌干达国内,不同文化和地区的避孕药具使用率和相关因素也各不相同。我们确定了在乌干达西南部姆巴拉拉市的公共计划生育诊所就诊的妇女中提前取出植入物的流行率和相关因素:我们于 2023 年 4 月至 7 月在姆巴拉拉市的四家公立计划生育诊所开展了一项横断面研究。我们连续招募妇女并发放调查问卷,以获取有关人口和医疗特征的数据。我们将提前取出定义为在一段时间内停止植入:我们共招募了 406 名妇女,平均年龄为 29 ± 6 岁。提前取出避孕植入物的发生率为 53%(n = 210;95%,CI:48-58%)。与提前取出植入物相关的因素包括:出现副作用(调整后的流行率 [aPR] = 1.63,95% CI:1.20-2.21)、植入植入物是为了实现职业目标(aPR = 1.88,95% CI:1.26-2.81)以及打算将植入物用于缔结婚约:约有一半的受访女性提前取出了避孕植入物。出现副作用的妇女、因职业责任而选择植入避孕药具的妇女以及打算将植入避孕药具用于以下目的的妇女
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信