A qualitative study of cultural concepts of distress among Rohingya refugees in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kathy Trang, Caroline Hiott, A K Rahim, Shafiqur Rahman, Alice J Wuermli
{"title":"A qualitative study of cultural concepts of distress among Rohingya refugees in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.","authors":"Kathy Trang, Caroline Hiott, A K Rahim, Shafiqur Rahman, Alice J Wuermli","doi":"10.1186/s13031-024-00606-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rohingya refugees residing in Bangladesh have been exposed to profound trauma in addition to ongoing daily stressors of living in the refugee camps. Accurate assessments of mental health burden and their impact among this population require culturally sensitive tools that remain lacking in this context. The purpose of this study was to characterize salient cultural concepts of distress (CCDs), their causes, consequences, and approaches to treatment, among Rohingya refugees living in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, to help inform future measurement and intervention design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2020 and March 2022, 106 free-listing interviews and 10 key informant interviews were conducted with community members to identify and better understand common CCDs. Rohingya research staff analyzed the interview transcripts by tabulating the frequency of unique CCDs in the free-listing interviews and the unique attributed causes, signs, consequences, and treatment strategies for each CCD in the key informant interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, five CCDs were identified: tenshon (tension), bishi sinta (excessive thinking), feshar (pressure), gum zai nofara (unable to sleep), and shoit-shoit lagon (feeling restless and/or trapped). Although the five CCDs had overlapping symptoms, they also had unique presentation, consequences, and preferred strategies for treatment that may impact service-seeking behavior. Three out of the five CCDs were considered life-threatening, if severe and left untreated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The five CCDs identified are culturally salient ways of experiencing and communicating distress within this community but are not adequately captured in existing mental health assessments for this population. This may negatively impact programmatic efforts among the group.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00606-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rohingya refugees residing in Bangladesh have been exposed to profound trauma in addition to ongoing daily stressors of living in the refugee camps. Accurate assessments of mental health burden and their impact among this population require culturally sensitive tools that remain lacking in this context. The purpose of this study was to characterize salient cultural concepts of distress (CCDs), their causes, consequences, and approaches to treatment, among Rohingya refugees living in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, to help inform future measurement and intervention design.

Methods: Between December 2020 and March 2022, 106 free-listing interviews and 10 key informant interviews were conducted with community members to identify and better understand common CCDs. Rohingya research staff analyzed the interview transcripts by tabulating the frequency of unique CCDs in the free-listing interviews and the unique attributed causes, signs, consequences, and treatment strategies for each CCD in the key informant interviews.

Results: In total, five CCDs were identified: tenshon (tension), bishi sinta (excessive thinking), feshar (pressure), gum zai nofara (unable to sleep), and shoit-shoit lagon (feeling restless and/or trapped). Although the five CCDs had overlapping symptoms, they also had unique presentation, consequences, and preferred strategies for treatment that may impact service-seeking behavior. Three out of the five CCDs were considered life-threatening, if severe and left untreated.

Conclusion: The five CCDs identified are culturally salient ways of experiencing and communicating distress within this community but are not adequately captured in existing mental health assessments for this population. This may negatively impact programmatic efforts among the group.

对孟加拉国考克斯巴扎尔地区罗兴亚难民痛苦文化概念的定性研究。
背景:居住在孟加拉国的罗兴亚难民除了在难民营中生活的日常压力之外,还遭受了严重的心理创伤。对这一人群的心理健康负担及其影响进行准确评估需要具有文化敏感性的工具,而这种工具在这种情况下仍然缺乏。本研究旨在描述生活在孟加拉国考克斯巴扎尔的罗兴亚难民中突出的心理困扰文化概念(CCD)、其原因、后果和治疗方法,为未来的测量和干预设计提供参考:在 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,对社区成员进行了 106 次自由列表访谈和 10 次关键信息提供者访谈,以确定和更好地了解常见的 CCD。罗辛亚族研究人员对访谈记录进行了分析,将自由列表访谈中独特的 CCD 频率以及关键信息提供者访谈中每种 CCD 的独特归因、征兆、后果和治疗策略制成表格:结果:总共确定了五种 CCD:tenshon(紧张)、bishi sinta(思虑过度)、feshar(压力)、gum zai nofara(无法入睡)和 shoit-shoit lagon(感到烦躁不安和/或困顿)。虽然这五种 CCD 的症状有重叠之处,但它们也有独特的表现形式、后果和偏好的治疗策略,这可能会影响寻求服务的行为。在这五种 CCD 中,如果情况严重且不及时治疗,有三种会危及生命:结论:所发现的五种 CCD 是该社区在文化上突出的体验和表达痛苦的方式,但在现有的针对该人群的心理健康评估中却没有充分反映出来。这可能会对该群体的项目工作产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信