Gross Motor Family Report: Refinement and evaluation of psychometric properties.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Elton D D Magalhães, Peter Rosenbaum, Marilyn Wright, F Virginia Wright, Lesley Pritchard, Kennea M A Ayupe, Ana Carolina de Campos, Rosane S Morais, Hercules R Leite, Paula S C Chagas
{"title":"Gross Motor Family Report: Refinement and evaluation of psychometric properties.","authors":"Elton D D Magalhães, Peter Rosenbaum, Marilyn Wright, F Virginia Wright, Lesley Pritchard, Kennea M A Ayupe, Ana Carolina de Campos, Rosane S Morais, Hercules R Leite, Paula S C Chagas","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To refine the Gross Motor Family Report (GM-FR) using parents' input and to evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this measurement study, 12 parents of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP), aged 2 to 18 years, classified in all levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), were interviewed about their experience completing the GM-FR (content validity). Parents' feedback was used to refine the measure which was then completed by 146 families to evaluate internal consistency, and discriminative and concurrent validity. Forty-six parents completed the GM-FR again, 7 to 30 days later, to evaluate test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GM-FR scoring, pictures, descriptions, and the total number of items were revised based on parents' feedback. The GM-FR version 2.0 demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.99), no floor/ceiling effects, and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). GM-FR scores discriminated between GMFCS levels (p < 0.05) and were strongly negatively correlated with GMFCS level (r = -0.92; p < 0.001). GM-FR scores correlated positively and strongly with the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (r = 0.94; p < 0.001) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Computer Adaptive Test mobility domain (r = 0.93; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Active participation of families in the GM-FR's development facilitated creation of a family-friendly instrument. This study provides strong evidence of reliability and validity to support GM-FR use in clinical practice and research for assessing gross motor performance of children and adolescents with CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To refine the Gross Motor Family Report (GM-FR) using parents' input and to evaluate its psychometric properties.

Method: In this measurement study, 12 parents of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP), aged 2 to 18 years, classified in all levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), were interviewed about their experience completing the GM-FR (content validity). Parents' feedback was used to refine the measure which was then completed by 146 families to evaluate internal consistency, and discriminative and concurrent validity. Forty-six parents completed the GM-FR again, 7 to 30 days later, to evaluate test-retest reliability.

Results: GM-FR scoring, pictures, descriptions, and the total number of items were revised based on parents' feedback. The GM-FR version 2.0 demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.99), no floor/ceiling effects, and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). GM-FR scores discriminated between GMFCS levels (p < 0.05) and were strongly negatively correlated with GMFCS level (r = -0.92; p < 0.001). GM-FR scores correlated positively and strongly with the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (r = 0.94; p < 0.001) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Computer Adaptive Test mobility domain (r = 0.93; p < 0.001).

Interpretation: Active participation of families in the GM-FR's development facilitated creation of a family-friendly instrument. This study provides strong evidence of reliability and validity to support GM-FR use in clinical practice and research for assessing gross motor performance of children and adolescents with CP.

粗大运动家庭报告:心理测量特性的完善与评估。
目的:根据家长的意见改进粗大运动家庭报告(GM-FR),并评估其心理测量学特性:在这项测量研究中,12 位年龄在 2 至 18 岁之间的脑性瘫痪(CP)儿童和青少年的家长接受了访谈,了解了他们完成粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)各等级的经验(内容效度)。家长的反馈意见被用于改进测量方法,然后由 146 个家庭完成测量,以评估内部一致性、区分度和并发效度。46 位家长在 7 至 30 天后再次完成了 GM-FR,以评估测试-再测试的可靠性:结果:根据家长的反馈,对 GM-FR 的评分、图片、描述和项目总数进行了修订。GM-FR 2.0 版显示出较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.99),无地板/天花板效应,测试-再测可靠性极佳(类内相关系数 = 0.99)。GM-FR 分数可区分不同的 GMFCS 水平(p 解释:在开发 GM-FR 的过程中,家庭的积极参与促进了这一家庭友好型工具的诞生。本研究提供了可靠和有效的证据,支持在临床实践和研究中使用 GM-FR 评估患有 CP 的儿童和青少年的粗大运动表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信