Analysis of factors affecting the diagnostic yield for microbiologic diagnosis from percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Muhammet Arslan, Halil S Aslan, Muhammed Tekinhatun, Tugçe Donmez, Utku Ozgen, Tugba Sarı
{"title":"Analysis of factors affecting the diagnostic yield for microbiologic diagnosis from percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage.","authors":"Muhammet Arslan, Halil S Aslan, Muhammed Tekinhatun, Tugçe Donmez, Utku Ozgen, Tugba Sarı","doi":"10.3855/jidc.19195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the diagnostic yield of microbiologic diagnosis obtained through percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage procedures. We analyzed the influence of diverse clinical, radiological, and pre-procedural factors on the success of microbiologic diagnosis in this context.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage was performed to assess the factors affecting the diagnostic yield for microbiologic diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 patients undergoing percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage was included. The use of antibiotics during the procedure and the spread of the abscess to other organs significantly increased the likelihood of obtaining a positive culture. Specifically, antibiotic use during the procedure raised the risk by up to 3.30-fold (OR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.48-7.65, p = 0.004), while abscess spread to another organ increased the risk by approximately 1.87-fold (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 0.98-3.61, p = 0.057). Additionally, abscesses containing air and abscesses with an air-fluid level were more common in patients with positive culture results. Other factors, such as gender, age, malignancy prevalence, and surgical history, did not significantly impact culture results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the factors affecting the diagnostic yield of microbiologic diagnosis from percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage. The findings underscore the importance of considering patient-specific variables and procedural aspects when planning and executing abscess drainage procedures. Further research can build upon these insights to develop evidence-based guidelines for optimizing the diagnostic yield of percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"18 7","pages":"1026-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.19195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the diagnostic yield of microbiologic diagnosis obtained through percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage procedures. We analyzed the influence of diverse clinical, radiological, and pre-procedural factors on the success of microbiologic diagnosis in this context.

Methodology: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage was performed to assess the factors affecting the diagnostic yield for microbiologic diagnosis.

Results: A total of 174 patients undergoing percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage was included. The use of antibiotics during the procedure and the spread of the abscess to other organs significantly increased the likelihood of obtaining a positive culture. Specifically, antibiotic use during the procedure raised the risk by up to 3.30-fold (OR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.48-7.65, p = 0.004), while abscess spread to another organ increased the risk by approximately 1.87-fold (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 0.98-3.61, p = 0.057). Additionally, abscesses containing air and abscesses with an air-fluid level were more common in patients with positive culture results. Other factors, such as gender, age, malignancy prevalence, and surgical history, did not significantly impact culture results.

Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the factors affecting the diagnostic yield of microbiologic diagnosis from percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage. The findings underscore the importance of considering patient-specific variables and procedural aspects when planning and executing abscess drainage procedures. Further research can build upon these insights to develop evidence-based guidelines for optimizing the diagnostic yield of percutaneous abdominal abscess drainage procedures.

影响经皮腹腔脓肿引流术微生物诊断率的因素分析。
导言:本研究旨在探讨影响经皮腹腔脓肿引流术微生物诊断率的因素。我们分析了各种临床、放射学和术前因素对微生物诊断成功率的影响:方法:对接受经皮腹腔脓肿引流术的患者进行回顾性分析,评估影响微生物诊断率的因素:结果:共纳入了174名接受经皮腹腔脓肿引流术的患者。在手术过程中使用抗生素以及脓肿扩散到其他器官会显著增加培养阳性的可能性。具体来说,手术过程中使用抗生素会使风险增加高达 3.30 倍(OR = 3.30,95% CI 1.48-7.65,p = 0.004),而脓肿扩散到其他器官会使风险增加约 1.87 倍(OR = 1.87,95% CI 0.98-3.61,p = 0.057)。此外,在培养结果呈阳性的患者中,含有空气的脓肿和气液水平的脓肿更为常见。性别、年龄、恶性肿瘤发病率和手术史等其他因素对培养结果没有明显影响:本研究就影响经皮腹腔脓肿引流术微生物诊断率的因素提供了有价值的见解。研究结果强调了在计划和执行脓肿引流手术时考虑患者特异性变量和程序方面的重要性。进一步的研究可以在这些见解的基础上制定循证指南,以优化经皮腹腔脓肿引流术的诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信