Early graft-infiltrating lymphocytes are not associated with graft rejection in a mouse model of skin transplantation.

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Immunology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1111/sji.13397
Ryo Kanazawa, Ryoichi Goto, Takuya Harada, Takuji Ota, Nozomi Kobayashi, Kazuaki Shibuya, Yoshikazu Ganchiku, Masaaki Watanabe, Masaaki Zaitsu, Norio Kawamura, Tsuyoshi Shimamura, Akinobu Taketomi
{"title":"Early graft-infiltrating lymphocytes are not associated with graft rejection in a mouse model of skin transplantation.","authors":"Ryo Kanazawa, Ryoichi Goto, Takuya Harada, Takuji Ota, Nozomi Kobayashi, Kazuaki Shibuya, Yoshikazu Ganchiku, Masaaki Watanabe, Masaaki Zaitsu, Norio Kawamura, Tsuyoshi Shimamura, Akinobu Taketomi","doi":"10.1111/sji.13397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Graft-infiltrating lymphocytes (GILs) play an important role in promoting rejection after organ transplantation. We recently reported that GILs that accumulated up to 3 days post-transplantation did not promote rejection, whereas GILs present 3-5 days post-transplantation promoted rejection in a mouse heart transplantation model. However, the immunological behaviour of GILs in murine skin transplantation remains unclear. GILs were isolated on days 3, 5 or 7 post-transplantation from C57BL/6 (B6) allogeneic skin grafts transplanted onto BALB/c mice. BALB/c Rag2<sup>-/-</sup> γc<sup>-/-</sup> mice (BRGs) underwent B6 skin graft transplantation 10 weeks after adoptive transfer of day 3, 5, or 7 GILs. BRGs reconstituted with day 5 or 7 GILs completely rejected B6 grafts. However, when B6 grafts harvested from recipient BALB/c mice on day 5 or 7 were re-transplanted into BRGs, half of the re-transplanted day 5 grafts established long-term survival, although all re-transplanted day 7 grafts were rejected. BRGs reconstituted with day 3 GILs did not reject B6 grafts. Consistently, re-transplantation using day 3 skin grafts resulted in no rejection. Administration of anti-CD25 antibodies did not prevent the phenomenon observed for the day 3 skin grafts. Furthermore, BRGs reconstituted with splenocytes from naïve BALB/c mice immediately rejected the naïve B6 skin grafts and the re-transplanted day 3 B6 grafts, suggesting that day 3 GILs were unable to induce allograft rejection during the rejection process. In conclusion, the immunological role of GILs depends on the time since transplantation. Day 3 GILs had neither protective nor alloreactive effects in the skin transplant model.</p>","PeriodicalId":21493,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"e13397"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.13397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graft-infiltrating lymphocytes (GILs) play an important role in promoting rejection after organ transplantation. We recently reported that GILs that accumulated up to 3 days post-transplantation did not promote rejection, whereas GILs present 3-5 days post-transplantation promoted rejection in a mouse heart transplantation model. However, the immunological behaviour of GILs in murine skin transplantation remains unclear. GILs were isolated on days 3, 5 or 7 post-transplantation from C57BL/6 (B6) allogeneic skin grafts transplanted onto BALB/c mice. BALB/c Rag2-/- γc-/- mice (BRGs) underwent B6 skin graft transplantation 10 weeks after adoptive transfer of day 3, 5, or 7 GILs. BRGs reconstituted with day 5 or 7 GILs completely rejected B6 grafts. However, when B6 grafts harvested from recipient BALB/c mice on day 5 or 7 were re-transplanted into BRGs, half of the re-transplanted day 5 grafts established long-term survival, although all re-transplanted day 7 grafts were rejected. BRGs reconstituted with day 3 GILs did not reject B6 grafts. Consistently, re-transplantation using day 3 skin grafts resulted in no rejection. Administration of anti-CD25 antibodies did not prevent the phenomenon observed for the day 3 skin grafts. Furthermore, BRGs reconstituted with splenocytes from naïve BALB/c mice immediately rejected the naïve B6 skin grafts and the re-transplanted day 3 B6 grafts, suggesting that day 3 GILs were unable to induce allograft rejection during the rejection process. In conclusion, the immunological role of GILs depends on the time since transplantation. Day 3 GILs had neither protective nor alloreactive effects in the skin transplant model.

在小鼠皮肤移植模型中,早期移植物浸润淋巴细胞与移植物排斥反应无关。
移植物浸润淋巴细胞(GILs)在促进器官移植后排斥反应方面发挥着重要作用。我们最近报告说,在小鼠心脏移植模型中,移植后 3 天内积累的 GILs 不会促进排斥反应,而移植后 3-5 天内存在的 GILs 则会促进排斥反应。然而,GILs 在小鼠皮肤移植中的免疫行为仍不清楚。在移植后第3、5或7天,从移植到BALB/c小鼠身上的C57BL/6(B6)异体皮肤移植物中分离出GILs。BALB/c Rag2-/-γc-/- 小鼠(BRGs)在收养转移第 3、5 或 7 天 GILs 10 周后接受 B6 皮肤移植物移植。用第 5 天或第 7 天 GIL 重组的 BRGs 完全排斥 B6 移植物。然而,当第 5 天或第 7 天从受体 BALB/c 小鼠身上获取的 B6 移植物被再次移植到 BRGs 中时,虽然所有第 7 天再次移植的移植物都被排斥,但有一半第 5 天再次移植的移植物能够长期存活。用第 3 天 GIL 重组的 BRG 不会排斥 B6 移植物。同样,使用第 3 天皮肤移植物进行再移植也不会产生排斥反应。施用抗 CD25 抗体并不能阻止第 3 天皮肤移植物的排斥现象。此外,用天真的 BALB/c 小鼠脾细胞重组的 BRGs 会立即排斥天真的 B6 皮肤移植物和再次移植的第 3 天 B6 移植物,这表明第 3 天 GILs 无法在排斥过程中诱导同种异体移植物排斥反应。总之,GILs 的免疫作用取决于移植后的时间。在皮肤移植模型中,第3天的GILs既没有保护作用,也没有异体排斥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed international journal publishes original articles and reviews on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical immunology. The journal aims to provide high quality service to authors, and high quality articles for readers. The journal accepts for publication material from investigators all over the world, which makes a significant contribution to basic, translational and clinical immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信