[Health Literacy, Contact Points, Unmet Subjective Needs and Treatment Satisfaction of those Affected by Long Covid with Long-Lasting Neuropsychiatric Symptoms].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1055/a-2334-1822
Franziska Jung, Andrea Zülke, Kerstin Wirkner, Matthias Reusche, Christoph Engel, Christian Sander, Veronica Witte, Samira Zeynalova, Markus Loeffler, Arno Villringer, Dorothee Saur, Georg Schomerus, Melanie Luppa, Steffi G Riedel-Heller
{"title":"[Health Literacy, Contact Points, Unmet Subjective Needs and Treatment Satisfaction of those Affected by Long Covid with Long-Lasting Neuropsychiatric Symptoms].","authors":"Franziska Jung, Andrea Zülke, Kerstin Wirkner, Matthias Reusche, Christoph Engel, Christian Sander, Veronica Witte, Samira Zeynalova, Markus Loeffler, Arno Villringer, Dorothee Saur, Georg Schomerus, Melanie Luppa, Steffi G Riedel-Heller","doi":"10.1055/a-2334-1822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The bejective was to determine health literacy (HL) and care aspects of those affected by Long-COVID.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>407 patients with Long-COVID and long-term neuropsychiatric symptoms were interviewed in the LIFE study center. In addition to descriptive analyses, regression models were calculated to examine the relationships between health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16) and various aspects of care (RehaQ-N1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that 35.8% had problematic and 17.9% had inadequate HL. The majority of subjective needs were unmet and 47.7% of those affected were dissatisfied with the therapy they received.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Among those affected by Long-COVID, subjective HL is rather reduced. The healthcare system appears to be unprepared for these patients, which is reflected in unmet needs and low treatment satisfaction. This was even more pronounced among those exhibiting lower HL.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":"418-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2334-1822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The bejective was to determine health literacy (HL) and care aspects of those affected by Long-COVID.

Method: 407 patients with Long-COVID and long-term neuropsychiatric symptoms were interviewed in the LIFE study center. In addition to descriptive analyses, regression models were calculated to examine the relationships between health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16) and various aspects of care (RehaQ-N1).

Results: The results show that 35.8% had problematic and 17.9% had inadequate HL. The majority of subjective needs were unmet and 47.7% of those affected were dissatisfied with the therapy they received.

Discussion: Among those affected by Long-COVID, subjective HL is rather reduced. The healthcare system appears to be unprepared for these patients, which is reflected in unmet needs and low treatment satisfaction. This was even more pronounced among those exhibiting lower HL.

[受长期卧床影响并伴有长期神经精神症状者的健康素养、联络点、未满足的主观需求和治疗满意度]。
目的方法:在 LIFE 研究中心采访了 407 名患有长期慢性阻塞性脑损伤(Long-COVID)和长期神经精神症状的患者:在 LIFE 研究中心采访了 407 名患有长期慢性阻塞性脑损伤和长期神经精神症状的患者。除描述性分析外,还计算了回归模型,以研究健康素养(HLS-EU-Q16)与护理各方面(RehaQ-N1)之间的关系:结果显示,35.8%的人健康素养有问题,17.9%的人健康素养不足。大部分患者的主观需求未得到满足,47.7%的患者对所接受的治疗不满意:讨论:在长期慢性阻塞性肺气肿患者中,主观HL相当低。医疗系统似乎没有为这些患者做好准备,这反映在需求未得到满足和治疗满意度低上。这种情况在 HL 较低的患者中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信