Fetomaternal Outcome of Pregnant Women at Term Undergoing Cesarean Section.

Q3 Medicine
Sonu Bharati, Ganesh Dangal, Kenusha Devi Tiwari, Sunita Maharjan, Srijana Bhandari, Aruna Karki, Hema Kumari Pradhan, Ranjana Shrestha, Kabin Bhattachan
{"title":"Fetomaternal Outcome of Pregnant Women at Term Undergoing Cesarean Section.","authors":"Sonu Bharati, Ganesh Dangal, Kenusha Devi Tiwari, Sunita Maharjan, Srijana Bhandari, Aruna Karki, Hema Kumari Pradhan, Ranjana Shrestha, Kabin Bhattachan","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean section is one of the most common procedures performed in obstetric practice today and is a lifesaving surgery for mother and fetus. Cesarean sections are classified traditionally, as elective cesarean section or emergency cesarean. The purpose of this study is to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes in elective and emergency cesarean section so that measures can be taken to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive study including 400 pregnant women who underwent caesarean section were included in this study. Patients were subjected to elective or emergency cesarean section as per the indication and protocol of institute. were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period there were total 1080 deliveries. The average age of the women was 29.21±4.07 years. Of the 400 cesarean section cases, only 2.8% had wound infection, 3.8% had fever, 4.8% urinary tract infection (UTI) whereas no women had observed with post-partum hemorrhages (PPH) and maternal death. Regarding fetal outcome, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was observed in 16%, birth asphyxia was 2.3% poor Apgar score 2.5% and neonatal death was not observed. Rate of fever, UTI, wound infection, need of resuscitation and poor Apgar score was significantly high in emergency section than elective caesarean section whereas NICU admission was not statistically significant. The most common indication of emergency cesarean section were fetal dress and for previous LSCS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency cesarean was associated with increased maternal and perinatal complications than in elective cesarean section.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 1","pages":"21-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is one of the most common procedures performed in obstetric practice today and is a lifesaving surgery for mother and fetus. Cesarean sections are classified traditionally, as elective cesarean section or emergency cesarean. The purpose of this study is to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes in elective and emergency cesarean section so that measures can be taken to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Methods: A descriptive study including 400 pregnant women who underwent caesarean section were included in this study. Patients were subjected to elective or emergency cesarean section as per the indication and protocol of institute. were included in the study.

Results: During the study period there were total 1080 deliveries. The average age of the women was 29.21±4.07 years. Of the 400 cesarean section cases, only 2.8% had wound infection, 3.8% had fever, 4.8% urinary tract infection (UTI) whereas no women had observed with post-partum hemorrhages (PPH) and maternal death. Regarding fetal outcome, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was observed in 16%, birth asphyxia was 2.3% poor Apgar score 2.5% and neonatal death was not observed. Rate of fever, UTI, wound infection, need of resuscitation and poor Apgar score was significantly high in emergency section than elective caesarean section whereas NICU admission was not statistically significant. The most common indication of emergency cesarean section were fetal dress and for previous LSCS.

Conclusions: Emergency cesarean was associated with increased maternal and perinatal complications than in elective cesarean section.

接受剖腹产手术的临产孕妇的胎儿结局
背景:剖腹产是当今产科最常见的手术之一,也是挽救母亲和胎儿生命的手术。传统上将剖宫产分为择期剖宫产和急诊剖宫产。本研究的目的是比较择期剖宫产和急诊剖宫产的产妇和新生儿结局,以便采取措施降低产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率:本研究是一项描述性研究,包括 400 名接受剖腹产手术的孕妇。研究对象包括 400 名接受剖腹产手术的孕妇,患者均根据医院的指征和方案接受择期或急诊剖腹产手术:研究期间共有 1080 例分娩。平均年龄为(29.21±4.07)岁。在 400 例剖宫产病例中,仅有 2.8%的产妇出现伤口感染,3.8%的产妇发烧,4.8%的产妇出现尿路感染(UTI),没有产妇出现产后出血(PPH)和产妇死亡。在胎儿结局方面,16%的产妇住进了新生儿重症监护室(NICU),2.3%的产妇出生时窒息,Apgar 评分较差,占 2.5%,没有发现新生儿死亡。急诊剖腹产的发热、UTI、伤口感染、复苏需求和 Apgar 评分差的发生率明显高于择期剖腹产,而新生儿重症监护室的入院率则没有统计学意义。急诊剖宫产最常见的指征是胎儿着装和既往 LSCS:结论:与择期剖宫产相比,急诊剖宫产与产妇和围产期并发症增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信