Evaluation of the Variability of Ambient Interactive Zippy Estimation of Sequential Rapid Tests on the "imo" Perimeter in Patients With Stable Glaucoma.

Abstract

Prcis: Analysis of Ambient Interactive Zippy Estimation of Sequential Testing (AIZE) Rapid test variability in patients with stable glaucoma showed that the 95% prediction interval of the mean deviation (MD) value, potentially an index for judging progression, was ±1.63 to ±1.78 dB in early-to-moderate-stage patients.

Objective: To explore the 95% prediction interval of the MD value using the AIZE Rapid test strategy for glaucoma observation.

Patients and methods: This study included 72 patients with stable or suspected glaucoma who underwent the imo AIZE Rapid test 3 times or more within 2 years. Both eyes from each patient were classified as better or worse eyes. They were divided based on baseline MD values into the following 4 groups: MD > -3 dB, -6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB, -12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB, and MD ≤ -12 dB. The variability of MD during the observation period and the 95% prediction intervals were analyzed. Pointwise variability of limits at each test location was also calculated.

Results: The numbers of better and worse eyes included in the study were 46 and 33. The median follow-up period was 1.3 years (range: 0.5 to 1.9 y). The 95% prediction intervals for MD values were ±1.41 dB for better eyes (n = 46) and ±1.47 dB for worse eyes (n = 33). The 95% prediction intervals in the MD > -3 dB, -6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB, -12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB, and MD ≤ -12 dB groups were ±1.63 dB, ±1.34 dB, ±1.78 dB, and ±1.33 dB, respectively. Pointwise variability of worse eyes was larger than that of better eyes, especially between 10 to 15 dB.

Conclusion: In the case of a difference in MD greater than the 95% prediction intervals when compared with the previous visual field result, we should pay much attention to the possibility of progression of the glaucomatous visual field in patients with stable glaucoma.