Mechanical power ratio threshold for ventilator-induced lung injury.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Rosanna D'Albo, Tommaso Pozzi, Rosmery V Nicolardi, Mauro Galizia, Giulia Catozzi, Valentina Ghidoni, Beatrice Donati, Federica Romitti, Peter Herrmann, Mattia Busana, Simone Gattarello, Francesca Collino, Aurelio Sonzogni, Luigi Camporota, John J Marini, Onnen Moerer, Konrad Meissner, Luciano Gattinoni
{"title":"Mechanical power ratio threshold for ventilator-induced lung injury.","authors":"Rosanna D'Albo, Tommaso Pozzi, Rosmery V Nicolardi, Mauro Galizia, Giulia Catozzi, Valentina Ghidoni, Beatrice Donati, Federica Romitti, Peter Herrmann, Mattia Busana, Simone Gattarello, Francesca Collino, Aurelio Sonzogni, Luigi Camporota, John J Marini, Onnen Moerer, Konrad Meissner, Luciano Gattinoni","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00649-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Mechanical power (MP) is a summary variable incorporating all causes of ventilator-induced-lung-injury (VILI). We expressed MP as the ratio between observed and normal expected values (MP<sub>ratio</sub>).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To define a threshold value of MP<sub>ratio</sub> leading to the development of VILI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a population of 82 healthy pigs, a threshold of MP<sub>ratio</sub> for VILI, as assessed by histological variables and confirmed by using unsupervised cluster analysis was 4.5. The population was divided into two groups with MP<sub>ratio</sub> above or below the threshold.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We measured physiological variables every six hours. At the end of the experiment, we measured lung weight and wet-to-dry ratio to quantify edema. Histological samples were analyzed for alveolar ruptures, inflammation, alveolar edema, atelectasis. An MP<sub>ratio</sub> threshold of 4.5 was associated with worse injury, lung weight, wet-to-dry ratio and fluid balance (all p < 0.001). After 48 h, in the two MP<sub>ratio</sub> clusters (above or below 4.5), respiratory system elastance, mean pulmonary artery pressure and physiological dead space differed by 32%, 36% and 22%, respectively (all p < 0.001), being worse in the high MP<sub>ratio</sub> group. Also, the changes in driving pressure, lung elastance, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, central venous pressure differed by 17%, 64%, 8%, 25%, respectively (all p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design. In addition, the computation for the expected MP in pigs is based on arbitrary criteria. Different values of expected MP may change the absolute value of MP ratio but will not change the concept of the existence of an injury threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concept of MP<sub>ratio</sub> is a physiological and intuitive way to quantify the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. Our results suggest that a mechanical power ratio > 4.5 MP<sub>ratio</sub> in healthy lungs subjected to 48 h of mechanical ventilation appears to be a threshold for the development of ventilator-induced lung injury, as indicated by the convergence of histological, physiological, and anatomical alterations. In humans and in lungs that are already injured, this threshold is likely to be different.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00649-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Mechanical power (MP) is a summary variable incorporating all causes of ventilator-induced-lung-injury (VILI). We expressed MP as the ratio between observed and normal expected values (MPratio).

Objective: To define a threshold value of MPratio leading to the development of VILI.

Methods: In a population of 82 healthy pigs, a threshold of MPratio for VILI, as assessed by histological variables and confirmed by using unsupervised cluster analysis was 4.5. The population was divided into two groups with MPratio above or below the threshold.

Measurements and main results: We measured physiological variables every six hours. At the end of the experiment, we measured lung weight and wet-to-dry ratio to quantify edema. Histological samples were analyzed for alveolar ruptures, inflammation, alveolar edema, atelectasis. An MPratio threshold of 4.5 was associated with worse injury, lung weight, wet-to-dry ratio and fluid balance (all p < 0.001). After 48 h, in the two MPratio clusters (above or below 4.5), respiratory system elastance, mean pulmonary artery pressure and physiological dead space differed by 32%, 36% and 22%, respectively (all p < 0.001), being worse in the high MPratio group. Also, the changes in driving pressure, lung elastance, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, central venous pressure differed by 17%, 64%, 8%, 25%, respectively (all p < 0.001).

Limitations: The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design. In addition, the computation for the expected MP in pigs is based on arbitrary criteria. Different values of expected MP may change the absolute value of MP ratio but will not change the concept of the existence of an injury threshold.

Conclusions: The concept of MPratio is a physiological and intuitive way to quantify the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. Our results suggest that a mechanical power ratio > 4.5 MPratio in healthy lungs subjected to 48 h of mechanical ventilation appears to be a threshold for the development of ventilator-induced lung injury, as indicated by the convergence of histological, physiological, and anatomical alterations. In humans and in lungs that are already injured, this threshold is likely to be different.

呼吸机诱发肺损伤的机械功率比阈值。
理论依据:机械功率(MP)是一个综合变量,包含了呼吸机诱发肺损伤(VILI)的所有原因。我们将 MP 表示为观察值与正常预期值之间的比率(MPratio):确定导致 VILI 发生的 MPratio 临界值:在由 82 头健康猪组成的群体中,根据组织学变量评估并通过无监督聚类分析确认的 VILI 临界 MPratio 值为 4.5。猪群被分为两组,MPratio 分别高于或低于阈值:我们每隔六小时测量一次生理变量。实验结束时,我们测量肺重量和干湿比以量化水肿。组织学样本分析了肺泡破裂、炎症、肺泡水肿和肺不张。MPratio 临界值为 4.5 与损伤、肺重量、干湿比和体液平衡的恶化有关(所有 p ratio 组)(高于或低于 4.5),呼吸系统弹性、平均肺动脉压和生理死腔分别相差 32%、36% 和 22%(所有 p ratio 组)。此外,驱动压、肺弹性、肺动脉闭塞压和中心静脉压的变化分别相差 17%、64%、8% 和 25%(均为 p 比值组):本研究的主要局限性在于其回顾性设计。此外,猪的预期 MP 值是根据任意标准计算得出的。不同的预期 MP 值可能会改变 MP 比值的绝对值,但不会改变存在损伤阈值的概念:MP比率的概念是量化呼吸机诱发肺损伤风险的一种生理学直观方法。我们的研究结果表明,在接受 48 小时机械通气的健康肺部中,机械功率比 > 4.5 MPratio 似乎是呼吸机诱发肺损伤的一个阈值,组织学、生理学和解剖学改变都表明了这一点。在人体和已经受伤的肺中,这一阈值可能有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信