Telehealth Utilization in Neuro-Oncology: Commentary on a Single Institution Experience After the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Current Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s11912-024-01588-5
Ugur Sener, Joon Uhm, Tufia Haddad, Joshua Pritchett
{"title":"Telehealth Utilization in Neuro-Oncology: Commentary on a Single Institution Experience After the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Ugur Sener, Joon Uhm, Tufia Haddad, Joshua Pritchett","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01588-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory and reimbursement policy changes provided patients improved access to neuro-oncology by telehealth. Here we discuss benefits and limitations of telehealth use in neuro-oncology. We review utilization of telemedicine services following the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Utilization of telemedicine by neuro-oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic was 52%, compared to 27-29% for other solid tumors groups. Following the pandemic, between January 2021 and April 2024, telehealth utilization has remained high in neuro-oncology with approximately 30% of all visits completed by telemedicine, compared to 10-15% for other solid tumor groups. The striking difference between telehealth visit utilization in neuro-oncology and general medical oncology even after expiration of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency expiration and end of pandemic-related restrictions, underscores the potential value of convenient access to care for patients with central nervous system tumors. Given widespread use of telehealth in neuro-oncology, prospective evaluation to determine the safety, usability, and acceptance of video-enabled, telehealth visits is critical. Such data may lead to broader adoption of telehealth, lead to regulatory and reimbursement reform for telehealth sustainability, and improve clinical trial access and accruals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1271-1276"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01588-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: During the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory and reimbursement policy changes provided patients improved access to neuro-oncology by telehealth. Here we discuss benefits and limitations of telehealth use in neuro-oncology. We review utilization of telemedicine services following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Recent findings: Utilization of telemedicine by neuro-oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic was 52%, compared to 27-29% for other solid tumors groups. Following the pandemic, between January 2021 and April 2024, telehealth utilization has remained high in neuro-oncology with approximately 30% of all visits completed by telemedicine, compared to 10-15% for other solid tumor groups. The striking difference between telehealth visit utilization in neuro-oncology and general medical oncology even after expiration of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency expiration and end of pandemic-related restrictions, underscores the potential value of convenient access to care for patients with central nervous system tumors. Given widespread use of telehealth in neuro-oncology, prospective evaluation to determine the safety, usability, and acceptance of video-enabled, telehealth visits is critical. Such data may lead to broader adoption of telehealth, lead to regulatory and reimbursement reform for telehealth sustainability, and improve clinical trial access and accruals.

Abstract Image

远程医疗在神经肿瘤学中的应用:COVID-19 大流行后的单个机构经验评述。
目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,监管和报销政策的变化为患者提供了更多通过远程医疗获得神经肿瘤学治疗的机会。在此,我们讨论了在神经肿瘤学中使用远程医疗的益处和局限性。我们回顾了 COVID-19 大流行后远程医疗服务的使用情况:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,神经肿瘤科的远程医疗利用率为 52%,而其他实体瘤组的利用率为 27-29%。大流行后,在 2021 年 1 月至 2024 年 4 月期间,神经肿瘤科的远程医疗利用率一直居高不下,所有就诊中约有 30% 是通过远程医疗完成的,而其他实体瘤组的利用率仅为 10-15%。即使在 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急状态到期和大流行相关限制结束后,神经肿瘤科和普通肿瘤内科的远程医疗就诊利用率仍存在显著差异,这凸显了中枢神经系统肿瘤患者便捷就医的潜在价值。鉴于远程医疗在神经肿瘤学中的广泛应用,对视频远程医疗就诊的安全性、可用性和接受度进行前瞻性评估至关重要。这些数据可能会促进远程医疗的广泛应用,推动远程医疗可持续发展的监管和报销改革,并改善临床试验的获取和累积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by cancer. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as cancer prevention, leukemia, melanoma, neuro-oncology, and palliative medicine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信