Prognostic role of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in high-risk BCG-naïve non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mohamad Abou Chakra, Riitta Lassila, Nancy El Beayni, Sarah L Mott, Michael A O'Donnell
{"title":"Prognostic role of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in high-risk BCG-naïve non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel.","authors":"Mohamad Abou Chakra, Riitta Lassila, Nancy El Beayni, Sarah L Mott, Michael A O'Donnell","doi":"10.1111/bju.16486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the role of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the prediction of response to sequential intravesical therapy, gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce), given to patients with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG)- naïve high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 115 patients who received intravesical Gem/Doce for high-risk NMIBC between January 2011 and December 2021. Data were computed as the median (interquartile range [IQR]) or mean (standard deviation [sd]). Cox regression analysis was performed to determine if neutrophilia, NLR, platelet counts, and PLR before instillation therapy were predictive of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Predictive performance was estimated using Uno's C-statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (IQR) follow-up for the overall cohort was 23 (13-36) months. The mean (sd) values for NLR, PLR and platelet counts were 3.4 (2.3), 142.2 (85.5), and 225.2 (75.1) × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, respectively. NLR was associated with RFS, with a hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% confidence interval CI 1.19-1.46). Concordance analysis showed that NLR had a good ability to predict RFS (C-index: 0.7, P < 0.01). The PLR and platelet count were not associated with RFS and did not predict recurrence. In terms of OS, none of these cellular inflammatory markers showed any prediction value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-treatment NLR provides some predictive accuracy for RFS in high-risk BCG-naïve patients receiving Gem/Doce. Further prospective trials are needed to validate this finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the role of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the prediction of response to sequential intravesical therapy, gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce), given to patients with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG)- naïve high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 115 patients who received intravesical Gem/Doce for high-risk NMIBC between January 2011 and December 2021. Data were computed as the median (interquartile range [IQR]) or mean (standard deviation [sd]). Cox regression analysis was performed to determine if neutrophilia, NLR, platelet counts, and PLR before instillation therapy were predictive of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Predictive performance was estimated using Uno's C-statistic.

Results: The median (IQR) follow-up for the overall cohort was 23 (13-36) months. The mean (sd) values for NLR, PLR and platelet counts were 3.4 (2.3), 142.2 (85.5), and 225.2 (75.1) × 109/L, respectively. NLR was associated with RFS, with a hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% confidence interval CI 1.19-1.46). Concordance analysis showed that NLR had a good ability to predict RFS (C-index: 0.7, P < 0.01). The PLR and platelet count were not associated with RFS and did not predict recurrence. In terms of OS, none of these cellular inflammatory markers showed any prediction value.

Conclusion: Pre-treatment NLR provides some predictive accuracy for RFS in high-risk BCG-naïve patients receiving Gem/Doce. Further prospective trials are needed to validate this finding.

中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在接受膀胱内吉西他滨/多西他赛治疗的高危卡介苗无效非肌层浸润性膀胱癌中的预后作用。
研究目的研究治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在预测吉西他滨和多西他赛(Gem/Doce)膀胱内序贯疗法反应中的作用:对2011年1月至2021年12月期间接受膀胱内Gem/Doce治疗的115名高风险NMIBC患者进行了回顾性分析。数据以中位数(四分位数间距 [IQR])或平均数(标准差 [sd])计算。进行了 Cox 回归分析,以确定灌注治疗前的中性粒细胞增多、NLR、血小板计数和 PLR 是否可预测无复发生存期 (RFS) 和总生存期 (OS)。预测效果采用Uno's C统计量进行估算:整个组群的随访时间中位数(IQR)为23(13-36)个月。NLR、PLR和血小板计数的平均值(sd)分别为3.4(2.3)、142.2(85.5)和225.2(75.1)×109/L。NLR 与 RFS 相关,危险比为 1.32(95% 置信区间 CI 1.19-1.46)。一致性分析表明,NLR具有很好的预测RFS的能力(C-指数:0.7,P:0.9):0.7,P治疗前 NLR 对接受 Gem/Doce 治疗的卡介苗无效高危患者的 RFS 有一定的预测准确性。需要进一步的前瞻性试验来验证这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信