A novel model for real-time risk evaluation of vehicle–pedestrian interactions at intersections

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
{"title":"A novel model for real-time risk evaluation of vehicle–pedestrian interactions at intersections","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Safety decisions for vehicles at an intersection rely on real-time, objective and continuous assessment of risks in vehicle–pedestrian interactions. Existing surrogate safety models, constrained by ideal assumptions of constant current speed and reliant on interaction points, often misjudge risks, and show inefficiency, inaccuracy and discontinuity. This work proposes a novel model for evaluation of those risks in vehicle–pedestrian interactions at intersections, which abstracts the pedestrian distribution density around a vehicle into a generalized model of driver-pedestrian interaction preferences. The introduction of two conceptions: ’driving risk index’ and ’driving risk gradient,’ facilitates the delineation of driving spaces for identifying safety–critical events. By means of the trajectory data from three intersections, model parameters are calibrated and a multidimensional vehicle–pedestrian interaction risk (VPIR) model is proposed to adapt the complex and dynamic characteristics of vehicle–pedestrian interactions at intersections. Commonly used surrogate safety models, such as Time to Collision (TTC), are selected as benchmark models. Results show that the proposed model overcomes the limitations of the existing interaction-point-based models, and offers a ideal assessment of driving risks at intersections. Finally, the model is illustrated with a case study that assesses the risks in vehicle–pedestrian interactions in varied scenarios and the case study indicates that the VPIR model works well in evaluating vehicle–pedestrian interaction risks. This work can facilitate humanoid learning in the autonomous driving domain, and achieve an ideal evaluation of vehicle–pedestrian interaction risks for safe and efficient vehicle navigation through an intersection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524002720","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety decisions for vehicles at an intersection rely on real-time, objective and continuous assessment of risks in vehicle–pedestrian interactions. Existing surrogate safety models, constrained by ideal assumptions of constant current speed and reliant on interaction points, often misjudge risks, and show inefficiency, inaccuracy and discontinuity. This work proposes a novel model for evaluation of those risks in vehicle–pedestrian interactions at intersections, which abstracts the pedestrian distribution density around a vehicle into a generalized model of driver-pedestrian interaction preferences. The introduction of two conceptions: ’driving risk index’ and ’driving risk gradient,’ facilitates the delineation of driving spaces for identifying safety–critical events. By means of the trajectory data from three intersections, model parameters are calibrated and a multidimensional vehicle–pedestrian interaction risk (VPIR) model is proposed to adapt the complex and dynamic characteristics of vehicle–pedestrian interactions at intersections. Commonly used surrogate safety models, such as Time to Collision (TTC), are selected as benchmark models. Results show that the proposed model overcomes the limitations of the existing interaction-point-based models, and offers a ideal assessment of driving risks at intersections. Finally, the model is illustrated with a case study that assesses the risks in vehicle–pedestrian interactions in varied scenarios and the case study indicates that the VPIR model works well in evaluating vehicle–pedestrian interaction risks. This work can facilitate humanoid learning in the autonomous driving domain, and achieve an ideal evaluation of vehicle–pedestrian interaction risks for safe and efficient vehicle navigation through an intersection.

十字路口人车互动实时风险评估新模型。
交叉路口车辆的安全决策依赖于对车辆与行人交互过程中的风险进行实时、客观和持续的评估。现有的代用安全模型受制于当前速度恒定的理想假设,并依赖于交互点,往往会误判风险,表现出低效、不准确和不连续性。本研究提出了一种新的模型,用于评估交叉路口车辆与行人交互过程中的风险,该模型将车辆周围的行人分布密度抽象为驾驶员与行人交互偏好的广义模型。引入了两个概念:驾驶风险指数 "和 "驾驶风险梯度 "这两个概念的引入,有助于划分驾驶空间,识别安全关键事件。通过三个交叉路口的轨迹数据,对模型参数进行了校准,并提出了多维车辆与行人交互风险(VPIR)模型,以适应交叉路口车辆与行人交互的复杂动态特征。选择常用的代用安全模型,如碰撞时间(TTC),作为基准模型。结果表明,所提出的模型克服了现有基于交互点的模型的局限性,可对交叉路口的驾驶风险进行理想的评估。最后,该模型通过一个案例研究进行了说明,该案例研究评估了不同场景下车辆与行人交互的风险,案例研究表明 VPIR 模型在评估车辆与行人交互风险方面效果良好。这项工作可促进自动驾驶领域的仿人学习,并实现对车辆与行人交互风险的理想评估,从而使车辆安全、高效地通过交叉路口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信