Effects of peer feedback in English writing classes on EFL students’ writing feedback literacy

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fanrong Weng , Cecilia Guanfang Zhao , Shangwen Chen
{"title":"Effects of peer feedback in English writing classes on EFL students’ writing feedback literacy","authors":"Fanrong Weng ,&nbsp;Cecilia Guanfang Zhao ,&nbsp;Shangwen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2024.100874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the increasing scholarly attention towards students’ writing feedback literacy in recent years, empirical explorations of effective approaches to enhancing this capacity remain scarce. While peer feedback often plays an important role in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing development, few studies seem to have addressed the potential impacts of peer feedback activities on students’ overall writing feedback literacy. To fill this gap, a mixed-methods study was designed to investigate the effect of peer feedback activities on students’ writing feedback literacy development across such dimensions as appreciating feedback, making judgements, acknowledging different sources of feedback, managing affect, and taking actions with feedback. Two intact classes, one as the experimental group and the other control group, participated in the study. The experimental group engaged in peer feedback activities during the semester (12 weeks), whereas the control group received conventional teacher feedback only. The pre- and post-intervention results based on a writing feedback literacy scale were compared between the two groups, in addition to the analysis of interviews with the teacher and focal students from the experimental group, as well as students’ written assignments and revisions after receiving peer feedback. Results showed that peer feedback activities could significantly improve students’ appreciation of feedback and their ability to make judgements. Nevertheless, no significant changes in other dimensions were identified. These findings extend the current understanding of EFL students’ writing feedback literacy and hold valuable pedagogical implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 100874"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increasing scholarly attention towards students’ writing feedback literacy in recent years, empirical explorations of effective approaches to enhancing this capacity remain scarce. While peer feedback often plays an important role in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing development, few studies seem to have addressed the potential impacts of peer feedback activities on students’ overall writing feedback literacy. To fill this gap, a mixed-methods study was designed to investigate the effect of peer feedback activities on students’ writing feedback literacy development across such dimensions as appreciating feedback, making judgements, acknowledging different sources of feedback, managing affect, and taking actions with feedback. Two intact classes, one as the experimental group and the other control group, participated in the study. The experimental group engaged in peer feedback activities during the semester (12 weeks), whereas the control group received conventional teacher feedback only. The pre- and post-intervention results based on a writing feedback literacy scale were compared between the two groups, in addition to the analysis of interviews with the teacher and focal students from the experimental group, as well as students’ written assignments and revisions after receiving peer feedback. Results showed that peer feedback activities could significantly improve students’ appreciation of feedback and their ability to make judgements. Nevertheless, no significant changes in other dimensions were identified. These findings extend the current understanding of EFL students’ writing feedback literacy and hold valuable pedagogical implications.

英语写作课上的同伴反馈对 EFL 学生写作反馈素养的影响
尽管近年来学术界对学生写作反馈素养的关注与日俱增,但对提高这种能力的有效方法的实证探索仍然很少。虽然同伴反馈通常在英语作为外语(EFL)的写作发展中扮演着重要角色,但似乎很少有研究涉及同伴反馈活动对学生整体写作反馈素养的潜在影响。为了填补这一空白,我们设计了一项混合方法研究,以调查同伴反馈活动对学生写作反馈素养发展的影响,包括欣赏反馈、做出判断、承认不同的反馈来源、管理情感以及根据反馈采取行动等方面。参加研究的是两个完整的班级,一个是实验组,另一个是对照组。实验组在学期(12 周)内参与同伴反馈活动,而对照组只接受传统的教师反馈。除了对实验组教师和重点学生的访谈、学生的书面作业和接受同伴反馈后的修改进行分析外,还根据写作反馈素养量表对两组干预前后的结果进行了比较。结果表明,同伴反馈活动能显著提高学生对反馈的理解和判断能力。然而,其他方面并没有发现明显的变化。这些研究结果扩展了目前对 EFL 学生写作反馈素养的理解,具有重要的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信