The Problem of the Human Nature in the Context of the Argument against Priestly Celibacy in the 18th Century France

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Sergey Vorontsov
{"title":"The Problem of the Human Nature in the Context of the Argument against Priestly Celibacy in the 18th Century France","authors":"Sergey Vorontsov","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-175-185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the influence of the shift in the philosophy of nature and that of human nature on the understanding of clerical celibacy. The critics of celibacy argued that the whole system of the human body was inactive, which caused melancholy and affected the soul. One of the symptoms of this disease was misanthropy which was against natural sociability. The celibate priest thus found himself asocial. This argument was based on the new mechanistic metaphors of the human body and resulted from the discussion on the mind-body problem, as well as from the construction of the new systems of nature (e.g. that of Buffon and Linnaeus), which exploited the relation between the reproduction and the order of nature. The apology of celibacy affirmed that celibacy demon­strated the possibility of overcoming one’s nature and that it was a state of per­fection because it imitated the nature of angels. Consequently, the celibate priest overcame the natural family relations and interests and was able to embrace all with his paternal love. This understanding of celibacy largely excluded the prob­lem that underlies the argument against celibacy, postulating that the soul has power over the body on the basis of the (neo) Platonic view of the chain of be­ings. The article concludes that this discussion resulted in the construction of two incommunicable logics that describe the sacred status of the priest.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-175-185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the influence of the shift in the philosophy of nature and that of human nature on the understanding of clerical celibacy. The critics of celibacy argued that the whole system of the human body was inactive, which caused melancholy and affected the soul. One of the symptoms of this disease was misanthropy which was against natural sociability. The celibate priest thus found himself asocial. This argument was based on the new mechanistic metaphors of the human body and resulted from the discussion on the mind-body problem, as well as from the construction of the new systems of nature (e.g. that of Buffon and Linnaeus), which exploited the relation between the reproduction and the order of nature. The apology of celibacy affirmed that celibacy demon­strated the possibility of overcoming one’s nature and that it was a state of per­fection because it imitated the nature of angels. Consequently, the celibate priest overcame the natural family relations and interests and was able to embrace all with his paternal love. This understanding of celibacy largely excluded the prob­lem that underlies the argument against celibacy, postulating that the soul has power over the body on the basis of the (neo) Platonic view of the chain of be­ings. The article concludes that this discussion resulted in the construction of two incommunicable logics that describe the sacred status of the priest.
十八世纪法国反对牧师独身主义论战中的人性问题
文章探讨了自然哲学和人性哲学的转变对教士独身主义理解的影响。独身主义的批评者认为,人体的整个系统都不活跃,这会导致忧郁并影响灵魂。这种疾病的症状之一就是厌世,这与自然的交际能力背道而驰。因此,独身神父发现自己不合群。这一论点是以新的人体机械论隐喻为基础的,是心身问题讨论的结果,也是构建新的自然体系(如布丰和林奈的自然体系)的结果,它利用了生殖与自然秩序之间的关系。对独身主义的辩护申明,独身主义证明了克服个人本性的可能性,独身主义是一种完美的状态,因为它模仿了天使的本性。因此,独身神父克服了自然的家庭关系和利益,能够用父爱拥抱所有人。这种对独身主义的理解在很大程度上排除了反对独身主义的论点所依据的问题,即根据(新)柏拉图的生命链观点,假定灵魂具有支配身体的力量。文章的结论是,这一讨论的结果是构建了两种不可沟通的逻辑来描述神父的神圣地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信