Mobile air-decontamination units: Can they be used for immunocompromised patients at high risk for fungal infections?

Joris Voisin , Jacqueline Shum Cheong Sing , Claire Terreaux-Masson , Carola Pierobon , Anne Thiebaut-Bertrand , Hervé Pelloux , Caroline Landelle , Marie-Pierre Brenier-Pinchart
{"title":"Mobile air-decontamination units: Can they be used for immunocompromised patients at high risk for fungal infections?","authors":"Joris Voisin ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Shum Cheong Sing ,&nbsp;Claire Terreaux-Masson ,&nbsp;Carola Pierobon ,&nbsp;Anne Thiebaut-Bertrand ,&nbsp;Hervé Pelloux ,&nbsp;Caroline Landelle ,&nbsp;Marie-Pierre Brenier-Pinchart","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2024.100102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Immunocompromised patients in the hematology department are usually hospitalized in areas protected by the high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration system. Renovations may require moving these patients at risk for invasive fungal infection to areas without HEPA. Mobile air handling units may be a solution in these cases. For renovation purposes, we evaluated the efficiency of mobile air handling units called Plasmair® as well as their optimization, by comparing two generations of devices.</p><p>Particle counts were performed to determine a particle cleanliness classification according to the ISO 14644–1 standard (high ISO classes correspond to a degraded particulate cleanliness). Mycological air samples were also taken to determine the percentage of positive samples and the median number of filamentous fungi colonies.</p><p>Without air treatment, only 18 % (38/216) of particle counts were classified as ISO 6. With the use of mobile air treatment units, this proportion increased to 71 % (205/288). The positivity rate of mycological samples without air treatment was 86 % (31/36) with a median number of fungal colonies of 3 (1–5)/0.5m<sup>3</sup>. A significant decrease in fungal pressure was observed when using Plasmair®. Percentages of positive air samples and the median number of colonies found between the old generation Plasmair® (T2006) and the new generation Plasmair® (Guardian) were significantly different, respectively 55.6 % (20/36) <em>versus</em> 22.2 % (8/36) and 1(0–1) <em>versus</em> 0 (0–0).</p><p>Finally, we confirm Plasmair® were effective in reducing airborne fungal pressure, the new generation especially. However, they were not effective enough to obtain negative mycological air samples as usually observed with the HEPA system, whatever the generation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049224000151/pdfft?md5=88679416b1a922398b45cfc4f2f29bed&pid=1-s2.0-S2773049224000151-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049224000151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunocompromised patients in the hematology department are usually hospitalized in areas protected by the high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration system. Renovations may require moving these patients at risk for invasive fungal infection to areas without HEPA. Mobile air handling units may be a solution in these cases. For renovation purposes, we evaluated the efficiency of mobile air handling units called Plasmair® as well as their optimization, by comparing two generations of devices.

Particle counts were performed to determine a particle cleanliness classification according to the ISO 14644–1 standard (high ISO classes correspond to a degraded particulate cleanliness). Mycological air samples were also taken to determine the percentage of positive samples and the median number of filamentous fungi colonies.

Without air treatment, only 18 % (38/216) of particle counts were classified as ISO 6. With the use of mobile air treatment units, this proportion increased to 71 % (205/288). The positivity rate of mycological samples without air treatment was 86 % (31/36) with a median number of fungal colonies of 3 (1–5)/0.5m3. A significant decrease in fungal pressure was observed when using Plasmair®. Percentages of positive air samples and the median number of colonies found between the old generation Plasmair® (T2006) and the new generation Plasmair® (Guardian) were significantly different, respectively 55.6 % (20/36) versus 22.2 % (8/36) and 1(0–1) versus 0 (0–0).

Finally, we confirm Plasmair® were effective in reducing airborne fungal pressure, the new generation especially. However, they were not effective enough to obtain negative mycological air samples as usually observed with the HEPA system, whatever the generation.

Abstract Image

移动式空气净化装置:能否用于真菌感染高风险免疫力低下的病人?
血液科免疫力低下的病人通常在受高效微粒空气过滤系统(HEPA)保护的区域住院。翻修时可能需要将这些有侵入性真菌感染风险的病人转移到没有高效微粒空气过滤系统的区域。在这种情况下,移动式空气处理装置可能是一种解决方案。出于翻新目的,我们通过对两代设备进行比较,评估了名为 Plasmair® 的移动式空气处理装置的效率及其优化。根据 ISO 14644-1 标准(ISO 等级越高,颗粒物清洁度越低),我们对颗粒物进行了计数,以确定颗粒物清洁度等级。此外,还采集了霉菌学空气样本,以确定阳性样本的百分比和丝状真菌菌落数的中位数。在未进行空气处理的情况下,只有 18% (38/216)的颗粒计数被划分为 ISO 6 级。使用移动式空气处理装置后,这一比例上升到 71%(205/288)。未经空气处理的真菌样本阳性率为 86 %(31/36),真菌菌落数中位数为 3 (1-5)/0.5m3。使用 Plasmair® 时,真菌压力明显降低。老一代 Plasmair® (T2006) 和新一代 Plasmair® (Guardian) 的阳性空气样本百分比和菌落数中位数有显著差异,分别为 55.6 % (20/36) 对 22.2 % (8/36) 和 1 (0-1) 对 0 (0-0)。不过,无论采用哪一代产品,它们都不能像通常使用 HEPA 系统那样有效地获得阴性霉菌空气样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信