Response of soil microbial homeostasis to soil ecological stoichiometric balance in a World Natural Heritage area

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Fupeng Li , Lifu Xu , Yongcheng Jiang , Yufeng Gong , Zhenming Zhang
{"title":"Response of soil microbial homeostasis to soil ecological stoichiometric balance in a World Natural Heritage area","authors":"Fupeng Li ,&nbsp;Lifu Xu ,&nbsp;Yongcheng Jiang ,&nbsp;Yufeng Gong ,&nbsp;Zhenming Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil microbial biomass stoichiometry homeostasis is essential for microorganism survival and ecosystem stability. Despite its importance, research on soil microbial homeostasis in Natural World Heritage Sites (NWHS) is lacking. This study analyzed ecological stoichiometry and microbial homeostasis in surface (0–20 cm) and subsurface (20–40 cm) soils across various vegetation types in Fanjing Mountain, an NWHS in China. The objective was to explore microbial homeostasis in relation to soil ecological stoichiometry and identify key influencing factors. Results indicated that microbial biomass stoichiometry in surface soil is higher than in subsurface soil for 5 vegetation types, mirroring nutrient stoichiometry but contrasting enzyme stoichiometry. Vector length (VL) suggests higher C limitation in subsurface soil for all vegetation types, while vector angle (VA) shows P limitation in surface soil of certain types and N limitation in subsurface soil across all types. Random forest analysis revealed that the microbial carbon-nitrogen ratio (MB C/N) was mainly contributed by C/N (14.11 %), SOC (12.31 %), pH (10.52 %), NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, SWC, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>-N in the surface soil, and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>-N (15.74 %), altitude, SWC, SOC, C/N in the subsurface soil, whereas for the microbial carbon-phosphorus ratio (MB C/P), altitude (12.16 %), SWC (9.86 %), and AP were the main contributing factors in the surface soil, and in the subsurface soil, altitude (10.49 %), C/P, SWC, SOC, and TP. This study provides insights into ecological stoichiometry, homeostasis, and nutrient limitations in Fanjing Mountain, aiding vegetation nutrient balance management in NWHS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 103760"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002360/pdfft?md5=5c173aa389d5b5e407fab18f9d751c9f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352186424002360-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil microbial biomass stoichiometry homeostasis is essential for microorganism survival and ecosystem stability. Despite its importance, research on soil microbial homeostasis in Natural World Heritage Sites (NWHS) is lacking. This study analyzed ecological stoichiometry and microbial homeostasis in surface (0–20 cm) and subsurface (20–40 cm) soils across various vegetation types in Fanjing Mountain, an NWHS in China. The objective was to explore microbial homeostasis in relation to soil ecological stoichiometry and identify key influencing factors. Results indicated that microbial biomass stoichiometry in surface soil is higher than in subsurface soil for 5 vegetation types, mirroring nutrient stoichiometry but contrasting enzyme stoichiometry. Vector length (VL) suggests higher C limitation in subsurface soil for all vegetation types, while vector angle (VA) shows P limitation in surface soil of certain types and N limitation in subsurface soil across all types. Random forest analysis revealed that the microbial carbon-nitrogen ratio (MB C/N) was mainly contributed by C/N (14.11 %), SOC (12.31 %), pH (10.52 %), NH4+-N, SWC, NO3--N in the surface soil, and NO3--N (15.74 %), altitude, SWC, SOC, C/N in the subsurface soil, whereas for the microbial carbon-phosphorus ratio (MB C/P), altitude (12.16 %), SWC (9.86 %), and AP were the main contributing factors in the surface soil, and in the subsurface soil, altitude (10.49 %), C/P, SWC, SOC, and TP. This study provides insights into ecological stoichiometry, homeostasis, and nutrient limitations in Fanjing Mountain, aiding vegetation nutrient balance management in NWHS.

世界自然遗产地区土壤微生物平衡对土壤生态平衡的响应
土壤微生物生物量平衡对微生物的生存和生态系统的稳定至关重要。尽管其重要性不言而喻,但有关世界自然遗产地(NWHS)土壤微生物平衡的研究却十分缺乏。本研究分析了中国世界自然遗产地梵净山不同植被类型的表层(0-20 厘米)和地下(20-40 厘米)土壤中的生态平衡和微生物平衡。该研究旨在探讨微生物平衡与土壤生态平衡的关系,并找出关键的影响因素。结果表明,在 5 种植被类型中,表层土壤中的微生物生物量比例高于地下土壤中的微生物生物量比例,这反映了养分比例,但与酶的比例形成鲜明对比。矢量长度(VL)表明,在所有植被类型中,表层下土壤中的碳限制较高;而矢量角度(VA)表明,某些类型的表层土壤中的磷限制较高,而所有类型的表层下土壤中的氮限制较高。随机森林分析表明,微生物碳氮比(MB C/N)主要由 C/N(14.11%)、SOC(12.31%)、pH(10.52%)、NH4+-N、SWC、表层土壤中的 NO3--N(15.而在微生物碳磷比(MB C/P)方面,地表土壤的主要影响因素是海拔(12.16 %)、SWC(9.86 %)和 AP,地下土壤的主要影响因素是海拔(10.49 %)、C/P、SWC、SOC 和 TP。本研究有助于了解梵净山的生态平衡、平衡和养分限制,有助于西北高原的植被养分平衡管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信