Crimean War, John Arthur Roebuck and Public Opinion in the Great Britain in the Middle of the 19th Century

V. Klochkov, Veronica S. Nazarova, Igor Uznarodov
{"title":"Crimean War, John Arthur Roebuck and Public Opinion in the Great Britain in the Middle of the 19th Century","authors":"V. Klochkov, Veronica S. Nazarova, Igor Uznarodov","doi":"10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The key issue of this work is the relationship between the press, public opinion, and political institutions of Great Britain during the Crimean War (1853–1856). In this context, the political activity of the Sheffield radical John Arthur Roebuck (1802–1879) is considered. The relevance of the work is determined by the research thesis that, during the Crimean War, public opinion was no longer only broadcast by the press but was largely shaped by it. Methods. The broad research context of the article is provided by a critical method of processing sources, some of which (publications from the provincial newspapers Sheffield and Rotterham Independent and Iris), discovered in the Northamptonshire Record Office, are being introduced into scientific circulation for the first time. Analysis. The goal of this article is to clarify the thesis well-established in traditional historiography, according to which the influence of the press on the current political agenda became significant only in the late 1860s. The analysis done in the article shows that if in the mid-30s of the 19th century the press only broadcast the opinion of the political elite, then during the Crimean War it already had the most direct influence on the formation of British public opinion. Results. The result of the study was the thesis that by the end of the Crimean War, the British press was quite able to influence public opinion and, even under certain circumstances, determine it. However, it still had very limited influence when it came to measures affecting the prerogative powers of Parliament and the Cabinet. Authors’ contribution. V.V. Klochkov determined the basic concept of the article and the methodological foundations of the study, as well as identified unpublished sources from the regional archives of Great Britain. V.S. Nazarova prepared the introduction of the article, created its structural composition, and analyzed the historiography of the problem. I.M. Uznarodov conducted an analysis of the publications of periodicals and formulated the main results of the study.","PeriodicalId":515910,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The key issue of this work is the relationship between the press, public opinion, and political institutions of Great Britain during the Crimean War (1853–1856). In this context, the political activity of the Sheffield radical John Arthur Roebuck (1802–1879) is considered. The relevance of the work is determined by the research thesis that, during the Crimean War, public opinion was no longer only broadcast by the press but was largely shaped by it. Methods. The broad research context of the article is provided by a critical method of processing sources, some of which (publications from the provincial newspapers Sheffield and Rotterham Independent and Iris), discovered in the Northamptonshire Record Office, are being introduced into scientific circulation for the first time. Analysis. The goal of this article is to clarify the thesis well-established in traditional historiography, according to which the influence of the press on the current political agenda became significant only in the late 1860s. The analysis done in the article shows that if in the mid-30s of the 19th century the press only broadcast the opinion of the political elite, then during the Crimean War it already had the most direct influence on the formation of British public opinion. Results. The result of the study was the thesis that by the end of the Crimean War, the British press was quite able to influence public opinion and, even under certain circumstances, determine it. However, it still had very limited influence when it came to measures affecting the prerogative powers of Parliament and the Cabinet. Authors’ contribution. V.V. Klochkov determined the basic concept of the article and the methodological foundations of the study, as well as identified unpublished sources from the regional archives of Great Britain. V.S. Nazarova prepared the introduction of the article, created its structural composition, and analyzed the historiography of the problem. I.M. Uznarodov conducted an analysis of the publications of periodicals and formulated the main results of the study.
克里米亚战争、约翰-阿瑟-罗巴克和 19 世纪中叶英国的舆论
导言。这部作品的关键问题是克里米亚战争(1853-1856 年)期间英国新闻、舆论和政治机构之间的关系。在此背景下,对谢菲尔德激进分子约翰-阿瑟-罗巴克(John Arthur Roebuck,1802-1879 年)的政治活动进行了研究。这项工作的相关性是由以下研究论点决定的:在克里米亚战争期间,公众舆论不再仅仅由新闻媒体播报,而是在很大程度上由新闻媒体塑造。研究方法。文章的广泛研究背景由处理资料来源的批判性方法提供,其中一些资料来源(省级报纸《谢菲尔德独立报》和《罗特勒姆独立报》以及《Iris》的出版物)是在北安普敦郡档案局发现的,是首次引入科学流通。分析。本文的目的是澄清传统史学中确立的论点,即报刊对当前政治议程的影响在 19 世纪 60 年代末才开始变得重要。文章的分析表明,如果说在 19 世纪 30 年代中期,报刊只是播报政治精英的观点,那么在克里米亚战争期间,报刊已经对英国公众舆论的形成产生了最直接的影响。研究结果。研究结果认为,到克里米亚战争结束时,英国报刊已经能够影响公众舆论,甚至在某些情况下能够决定公众舆论。然而,当涉及到影响议会和内阁特权的措施时,其影响力仍然非常有限。作者供稿В.В.克洛奇科夫确定了文章的基本概念和研究方法基础,并从英国地区档案中找到了未发表的资料。V.S. Nazarova 编写了文章的引言,确定了文章的结构组成,并分析了该问题的历史学。I.M. Uznarodov 对期刊出版物进行了分析,并制定了研究的主要成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信