Ningjing Yang M.S. , Peng Zhou M.S. , Jiahua Lyu M.D. , Jing Ren M.S. , Xinyu Nie M.S. , Sijia Zhao M.S. , Yihong Ye M.S.
{"title":"Prognostic value of sarcopenia and myosteatosis alterations on survival outcomes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma before and after radiotherapy","authors":"Ningjing Yang M.S. , Peng Zhou M.S. , Jiahua Lyu M.D. , Jing Ren M.S. , Xinyu Nie M.S. , Sijia Zhao M.S. , Yihong Ye M.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.nut.2024.112536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We assessed the impact and prognostic significance of alterations in muscle quality and quantity (myosteatosis and sarcopenia, respectively) in patients with esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively pooled 258 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent RT. Myosteatosis and sarcopenia were determined based on the skeletal muscle index derived from the muscle area and attenuation at the L3 level from computed tomography images. Subgroups were formed as 2 subgroups of non-sarcopenia/myosteatosis and sarcopenia/myosteatosis (with or without other muscle status) at either timepoint of RT, 3 subgroups of only-sarcopenia, only myosteatosis (without other muscle status), and the co-presence of sarcopenia and myosteatosis at either timepoint of RT, as well as 4 subgroups of continuous sarcopenia/myosteatosis, developed sarcopenia/myosteatosis, reduced sarcopenia/myosteatosis and non-sarcopenia/myosteatosis according to alterations of muscle status at both timepoints of RT. Overall survival (OS) was compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses based on Cox regression identified independent risk factors for prognosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Either pre- or post-RT, patients with sarcopenia and myosteatosis (with or without other muscle status) had poor OS. Patients with only myosteatosis (without other muscle status) showed the best OS (1352 days pre-RT vs. 1648 days post-RT), while patients with concurrent myosteatosis and sarcopenia had the worst OS (907 days pre-RT vs. 706 days post-RT). The ascending order of OS for sarcopenia alterations was as follows: continuous sarcopenia (1093 days), non-sarcopenia (1740 days), developed sarcopenia (2187 days), and reduced sarcopenia (2208 days) (<em>P</em> = 0.002). The ascending order of OS for myosteatosis alterations was ranked as follows: continuous myosteatosis (1165 days), reduced myosteatosis (1275 days), developed myosteatosis (1783 days), and non-myosteatosis (1942 days) (<em>P</em> = 0.061). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that increased age, longer tumor length, developed myosteatosis, and continuous myosteatosis were independent prognostic factors for OS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Muscle mass status at presentation and alterations in patients with esophageal cancer before and after RT should be considered prognostic indicators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19482,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 112536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724001850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
We assessed the impact and prognostic significance of alterations in muscle quality and quantity (myosteatosis and sarcopenia, respectively) in patients with esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT).
Methods
We retrospectively pooled 258 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent RT. Myosteatosis and sarcopenia were determined based on the skeletal muscle index derived from the muscle area and attenuation at the L3 level from computed tomography images. Subgroups were formed as 2 subgroups of non-sarcopenia/myosteatosis and sarcopenia/myosteatosis (with or without other muscle status) at either timepoint of RT, 3 subgroups of only-sarcopenia, only myosteatosis (without other muscle status), and the co-presence of sarcopenia and myosteatosis at either timepoint of RT, as well as 4 subgroups of continuous sarcopenia/myosteatosis, developed sarcopenia/myosteatosis, reduced sarcopenia/myosteatosis and non-sarcopenia/myosteatosis according to alterations of muscle status at both timepoints of RT. Overall survival (OS) was compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses based on Cox regression identified independent risk factors for prognosis.
Results
Either pre- or post-RT, patients with sarcopenia and myosteatosis (with or without other muscle status) had poor OS. Patients with only myosteatosis (without other muscle status) showed the best OS (1352 days pre-RT vs. 1648 days post-RT), while patients with concurrent myosteatosis and sarcopenia had the worst OS (907 days pre-RT vs. 706 days post-RT). The ascending order of OS for sarcopenia alterations was as follows: continuous sarcopenia (1093 days), non-sarcopenia (1740 days), developed sarcopenia (2187 days), and reduced sarcopenia (2208 days) (P = 0.002). The ascending order of OS for myosteatosis alterations was ranked as follows: continuous myosteatosis (1165 days), reduced myosteatosis (1275 days), developed myosteatosis (1783 days), and non-myosteatosis (1942 days) (P = 0.061). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that increased age, longer tumor length, developed myosteatosis, and continuous myosteatosis were independent prognostic factors for OS.
Conclusions
Muscle mass status at presentation and alterations in patients with esophageal cancer before and after RT should be considered prognostic indicators.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition has an open access mirror journal Nutrition: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
Founded by Michael M. Meguid in the early 1980''s, Nutrition presents advances in nutrition research and science, informs its readers on new and advancing technologies and data in clinical nutrition practice, encourages the application of outcomes research and meta-analyses to problems in patient-related nutrition; and seeks to help clarify and set the research, policy and practice agenda for nutrition science to enhance human well-being in the years ahead.