Proportion of industry payment value by category in radiology relative to other specialties

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Proportion of industry payment value by category in radiology relative to other specialties","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Industry payments to physicians are common, but it is unknown how the payments in different categories to radiologists compare to other specialties.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study is to assess the proportion of industry payments to physicians in radiology in certain categories relative to other specialties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Open Payments Database was analyzed from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 for industry payments to all allopathic &amp; osteopathic physicians, and classified into distinct clinical specialties. Payments to physicians in three categories were calculated in relation to total payments in each specialty during the study period: consulting fees, research, and royalties/ownership (royalty, license, or current or prospective ownership or investment).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The total value of industry payments to physicians across all specialties was just under $13 billion over the six-year period from 2017 to 2022. During this period, 51.4 million total payments were made to 791,746 physicians. US physicians in radiology received 452,027 payments for a total value of $357 million (2.8 % of total value). For radiologists, 32.8 % of industry payment value was attributed to royalties/ownership and 9.9 % to research, collectively adding up to 42.7 % of all industry payment. The only specialties with higher payments in these two categories considered reflective of innovation payments were the surgical specialties with higher royalty payments.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The proportion of industry payments in radiology in categories reflecting innovation (royalty/ownership and research fees) is high and second only to surgical specialties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124001670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Industry payments to physicians are common, but it is unknown how the payments in different categories to radiologists compare to other specialties.

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess the proportion of industry payments to physicians in radiology in certain categories relative to other specialties.

Methods

The Open Payments Database was analyzed from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 for industry payments to all allopathic & osteopathic physicians, and classified into distinct clinical specialties. Payments to physicians in three categories were calculated in relation to total payments in each specialty during the study period: consulting fees, research, and royalties/ownership (royalty, license, or current or prospective ownership or investment).

Results

The total value of industry payments to physicians across all specialties was just under $13 billion over the six-year period from 2017 to 2022. During this period, 51.4 million total payments were made to 791,746 physicians. US physicians in radiology received 452,027 payments for a total value of $357 million (2.8 % of total value). For radiologists, 32.8 % of industry payment value was attributed to royalties/ownership and 9.9 % to research, collectively adding up to 42.7 % of all industry payment. The only specialties with higher payments in these two categories considered reflective of innovation payments were the surgical specialties with higher royalty payments.

Conclusion

The proportion of industry payments in radiology in categories reflecting innovation (royalty/ownership and research fees) is high and second only to surgical specialties.

与其他专科相比,放射科按类别划分的行业支付价值比例
背景行业支付给医生的费用很常见,但不同类别支付给放射科医生的费用与其他专科相比如何,尚不得而知。本研究的目的是评估行业支付给放射科医生的某些类别的费用与其他专科相比所占的比例。方法分析了开放支付数据库从 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间行业支付给所有专科医师和骨科医师的费用,并将其分为不同的临床专科。根据研究期间各专科的总支付额,计算出三类支付给医生的款项:咨询费、研究费和特许权使用费/所有权(特许权使用费、许可证或当前或未来的所有权或投资)。结果在 2017 年至 2022 年的六年间,所有专科的行业支付给医生的总价值略低于 130 亿美元。在此期间,共向 791,746 名医生支付了 5140 万美元。美国放射科医生共收到 452 027 笔付款,总金额为 3.57 亿美元(占总金额的 2.8%)。对于放射科医生来说,32.8% 的行业支付价值归因于版税/所有权,9.9% 归因于研究,合计占行业支付总额的 42.7%。结论放射学行业支付中反映创新的类别(专利使用费/所有权和研究费)所占比例很高,仅次于外科专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信