Abandonment of prescriptions in medically underserved areas: Primary medication non-adherence in community pharmacies in the delta region of the United States

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"Abandonment of prescriptions in medically underserved areas: Primary medication non-adherence in community pharmacies in the delta region of the United States","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the U.S. alone, medication non-adherence is estimated to cause 1 in 10 hospitalizations, approximately 125,000 deaths annually, and cost the U.S. healthcare system just under $300 billion each year. Patients in medically underserved areas (MUAs) are particularly vulnerable to all forms of non-adherence and downstream morbidity and mortality; however, the extent to which primary medication non-adherence (i.e., prescription abandonment) affects the underserved is still largely unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the difference in rates of abandonment of quality measured prescriptions in areas that are medically underserved compared to areas that are not. The secondary objective is to assess the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on rates of prescription abandonment in both MUAs and those that are not.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective study, data on abandoned, quality measured prescriptions were collected and analyzed using Chi-Square analyses from one regional division of a large grocery-chain pharmacy containing ninety-one pharmacies located in Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Kentucky, and Missouri. The primary objective used 2019 data while the secondary objective used data from April – November of both 2019 and 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients from MUAs abandoned quality measured prescriptions at a higher rate of 5.44% compared to 4.77% of those not living in these areas (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). This study also discovered that during the COVID-19 pandemic, MUAs had a decrease in abandonment from 6.14% in 2019 to 6.02% in 2020 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Those from non-MUAs had non-significant change in abandonment (<em>P</em> = 0.87).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients in MUAs abandon quality measured prescriptions at a statistically significant higher rate when compared to patients who live in areas that are not considered to be medically underserved. Moreover, during the COVID-19 pandemic patients living in MUAs had a statistically significant decrease in prescription abandonment while those in non-MUAs did not statistically change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000817/pdfft?md5=818fe0310a747dc67e8c4b2de1bae8d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000817-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the U.S. alone, medication non-adherence is estimated to cause 1 in 10 hospitalizations, approximately 125,000 deaths annually, and cost the U.S. healthcare system just under $300 billion each year. Patients in medically underserved areas (MUAs) are particularly vulnerable to all forms of non-adherence and downstream morbidity and mortality; however, the extent to which primary medication non-adherence (i.e., prescription abandonment) affects the underserved is still largely unknown.

Objectives

To assess the difference in rates of abandonment of quality measured prescriptions in areas that are medically underserved compared to areas that are not. The secondary objective is to assess the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on rates of prescription abandonment in both MUAs and those that are not.

Methods

In this retrospective study, data on abandoned, quality measured prescriptions were collected and analyzed using Chi-Square analyses from one regional division of a large grocery-chain pharmacy containing ninety-one pharmacies located in Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Kentucky, and Missouri. The primary objective used 2019 data while the secondary objective used data from April – November of both 2019 and 2020.

Results

Patients from MUAs abandoned quality measured prescriptions at a higher rate of 5.44% compared to 4.77% of those not living in these areas (P < 0.01). This study also discovered that during the COVID-19 pandemic, MUAs had a decrease in abandonment from 6.14% in 2019 to 6.02% in 2020 (P < 0.01). Those from non-MUAs had non-significant change in abandonment (P = 0.87).

Conclusion

Patients in MUAs abandon quality measured prescriptions at a statistically significant higher rate when compared to patients who live in areas that are not considered to be medically underserved. Moreover, during the COVID-19 pandemic patients living in MUAs had a statistically significant decrease in prescription abandonment while those in non-MUAs did not statistically change.

医疗服务不足地区的弃药现象:美国三角洲地区社区药房不遵守基本用药规定的情况
背景据估计,仅在美国,每 10 人中就有 1 人因不遵医嘱用药而住院治疗,每年约有 125,000 人因此而死亡,美国医疗保健系统每年为此付出的代价接近 3,000 亿美元。医疗服务不足地区(MUAs)的患者尤其容易受到各种形式的不依从性以及下游发病率和死亡率的影响;然而,主要的不依从性用药(即放弃处方)对医疗服务不足地区的影响程度在很大程度上仍是未知数。目标评估医疗服务不足地区与非医疗服务不足地区放弃质量测量处方的比率差异。次要目标是评估 COVID-19 大流行对医疗服务欠缺地区和非医疗服务欠缺地区处方放弃率的影响。方法在这项回顾性研究中,使用 Chi-Square 分析法收集并分析了一家大型杂货连锁药店一个地区分部的处方放弃数据,该分部包含位于田纳西州、密西西比州、阿肯色州、肯塔基州和密苏里州的 91 家药店。主要目标使用的是 2019 年的数据,次要目标使用的是 2019 年和 2020 年 4 月至 11 月的数据。结果来自密苏里州的患者放弃质量测量处方的比例较高,为 5.44%,而不住在这些地区的患者放弃处方的比例为 4.77%(P <0.01)。这项研究还发现,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,少数民族地区的弃药率从 2019 年的 6.14% 降至 2020 年的 6.02%(P <0.01)。结论与居住在不被视为医疗服务不足地区的患者相比,医疗服务不足地区的患者放弃质量测量处方的比例在统计学上具有显著性。此外,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,居住在偏远地区的患者放弃处方的比例在统计学上有显著下降,而居住在非偏远地区的患者放弃处方的比例在统计学上没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信