{"title":"Switching of monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor in migraine. Results from a Spanish Cohort","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neurop.2024.100168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Switching between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may be a beneficial strategy after discontinuation. The aim of this study was to evaluate switching outcomes of effectiveness/tolerability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective multicentric study of migraine patients who switched to another CGRP–mAb due to lack of tolerability or effectiveness (defined as <<!--> <!-->30% reduction of monthly headache days [MHD]). Assessment was performed before and 3 months after switch. The main outcome was the response rate of MHD. Secondary outcomes included other effectiveness/tolerability measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>90patients were included: 75(83.3%) women, 72(80%) chronic, and 18(20%) episodic migraine. Mean age was 45.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11 years and mean duration of migraine was 29.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.4 years. Mean time under first mAb prior to switch was 10.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.9 months. Most frequent switches were erenumab-galcanezumab 38 (42.2%) and erenumab–fremanezumab 21 (23.3%). Lack of effectiveness (50/90, 55.6%) or tolerability (40/90, 44.4%) provoked switching. Most common adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were constipation and flu-like syndrome in 16 (40%) patients each. Response rate (RR) of MHD 30%–50% occurred in 10 patients (11.1%), ≥<!--> <!-->50% in 32 (35.6%) and <<!--> <!-->30% in 48 (53.3%) patients. Significant reduction was proved after switch in MHD (20 [IQR:15–29] vs 13 [IQR:7–23]; <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001) and monthly migraine days (15 [IQR:12–20] vs 10 [IQR:7–16]; <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001). After switching, 38 (42.2%) experienced AEs, but tolerability improved in 50% of patients who discontinued due to lack of tolerability. RR compared between switches to different CGRP-mAb classes showed no differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Switching may become an individualized strategy in migraine refractory patients who discontinue CGRP–mAbs due to lack of effectiveness/tolerability. In this study, supportive data are provided to the growing evidence of switch and future needs are highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74283,"journal":{"name":"Neurology perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667049624000255/pdfft?md5=ada1201f651792129ddd40e7444e7615&pid=1-s2.0-S2667049624000255-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667049624000255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Switching between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may be a beneficial strategy after discontinuation. The aim of this study was to evaluate switching outcomes of effectiveness/tolerability.
Methods
Retrospective multicentric study of migraine patients who switched to another CGRP–mAb due to lack of tolerability or effectiveness (defined as < 30% reduction of monthly headache days [MHD]). Assessment was performed before and 3 months after switch. The main outcome was the response rate of MHD. Secondary outcomes included other effectiveness/tolerability measures.
Results
90patients were included: 75(83.3%) women, 72(80%) chronic, and 18(20%) episodic migraine. Mean age was 45.9 ± 11 years and mean duration of migraine was 29.2 ± 12.4 years. Mean time under first mAb prior to switch was 10.4 ± 4.9 months. Most frequent switches were erenumab-galcanezumab 38 (42.2%) and erenumab–fremanezumab 21 (23.3%). Lack of effectiveness (50/90, 55.6%) or tolerability (40/90, 44.4%) provoked switching. Most common adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were constipation and flu-like syndrome in 16 (40%) patients each. Response rate (RR) of MHD 30%–50% occurred in 10 patients (11.1%), ≥ 50% in 32 (35.6%) and < 30% in 48 (53.3%) patients. Significant reduction was proved after switch in MHD (20 [IQR:15–29] vs 13 [IQR:7–23]; p < .001) and monthly migraine days (15 [IQR:12–20] vs 10 [IQR:7–16]; p < .001). After switching, 38 (42.2%) experienced AEs, but tolerability improved in 50% of patients who discontinued due to lack of tolerability. RR compared between switches to different CGRP-mAb classes showed no differences.
Conclusion
Switching may become an individualized strategy in migraine refractory patients who discontinue CGRP–mAbs due to lack of effectiveness/tolerability. In this study, supportive data are provided to the growing evidence of switch and future needs are highlighted.