Switching of monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor in migraine. Results from a Spanish Cohort

{"title":"Switching of monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor in migraine. Results from a Spanish Cohort","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neurop.2024.100168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Switching between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may be a beneficial strategy after discontinuation. The aim of this study was to evaluate switching outcomes of effectiveness/tolerability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective multicentric study of migraine patients who switched to another CGRP–mAb due to lack of tolerability or effectiveness (defined as &lt;<!--> <!-->30% reduction of monthly headache days [MHD]). Assessment was performed before and 3 months after switch. The main outcome was the response rate of MHD. Secondary outcomes included other effectiveness/tolerability measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>90patients were included: 75(83.3%) women, 72(80%) chronic, and 18(20%) episodic migraine. Mean age was 45.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11 years and mean duration of migraine was 29.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.4 years. Mean time under first mAb prior to switch was 10.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.9 months. Most frequent switches were erenumab-galcanezumab 38 (42.2%) and erenumab–fremanezumab 21 (23.3%). Lack of effectiveness (50/90, 55.6%) or tolerability (40/90, 44.4%) provoked switching. Most common adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were constipation and flu-like syndrome in 16 (40%) patients each. Response rate (RR) of MHD 30%–50% occurred in 10 patients (11.1%), ≥<!--> <!-->50% in 32 (35.6%) and &lt;<!--> <!-->30% in 48 (53.3%) patients. Significant reduction was proved after switch in MHD (20 [IQR:15–29] vs 13 [IQR:7–23]; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001) and monthly migraine days (15 [IQR:12–20] vs 10 [IQR:7–16]; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). After switching, 38 (42.2%) experienced AEs, but tolerability improved in 50% of patients who discontinued due to lack of tolerability. RR compared between switches to different CGRP-mAb classes showed no differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Switching may become an individualized strategy in migraine refractory patients who discontinue CGRP–mAbs due to lack of effectiveness/tolerability. In this study, supportive data are provided to the growing evidence of switch and future needs are highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74283,"journal":{"name":"Neurology perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667049624000255/pdfft?md5=ada1201f651792129ddd40e7444e7615&pid=1-s2.0-S2667049624000255-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667049624000255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Switching between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may be a beneficial strategy after discontinuation. The aim of this study was to evaluate switching outcomes of effectiveness/tolerability.

Methods

Retrospective multicentric study of migraine patients who switched to another CGRP–mAb due to lack of tolerability or effectiveness (defined as < 30% reduction of monthly headache days [MHD]). Assessment was performed before and 3 months after switch. The main outcome was the response rate of MHD. Secondary outcomes included other effectiveness/tolerability measures.

Results

90patients were included: 75(83.3%) women, 72(80%) chronic, and 18(20%) episodic migraine. Mean age was 45.9 ± 11 years and mean duration of migraine was 29.2 ± 12.4 years. Mean time under first mAb prior to switch was 10.4 ± 4.9 months. Most frequent switches were erenumab-galcanezumab 38 (42.2%) and erenumab–fremanezumab 21 (23.3%). Lack of effectiveness (50/90, 55.6%) or tolerability (40/90, 44.4%) provoked switching. Most common adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were constipation and flu-like syndrome in 16 (40%) patients each. Response rate (RR) of MHD 30%–50% occurred in 10 patients (11.1%), ≥ 50% in 32 (35.6%) and < 30% in 48 (53.3%) patients. Significant reduction was proved after switch in MHD (20 [IQR:15–29] vs 13 [IQR:7–23]; p < .001) and monthly migraine days (15 [IQR:12–20] vs 10 [IQR:7–16]; p < .001). After switching, 38 (42.2%) experienced AEs, but tolerability improved in 50% of patients who discontinued due to lack of tolerability. RR compared between switches to different CGRP-mAb classes showed no differences.

Conclusion

Switching may become an individualized strategy in migraine refractory patients who discontinue CGRP–mAbs due to lack of effectiveness/tolerability. In this study, supportive data are provided to the growing evidence of switch and future needs are highlighted.

偏头痛患者转换降钙素基因相关肽或其受体的单克隆抗体。西班牙队列研究结果。
背景在降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)和单克隆抗体(mAbs)之间切换可能是停药后的一种有益策略。方法对因缺乏耐受性或有效性(定义为每月头痛天数 [MHD] 减少 30%)而转用另一种 CGRP-mAb 的偏头痛患者进行多中心回顾性研究。评估在换药前和换药后 3 个月进行。主要结果是每月头痛天数的反应率。次要结果包括其他有效性/耐受性指标:90名患者中,75名(83.3%)为女性,72名(80%)为慢性偏头痛患者,18名(20%)为发作性偏头痛患者。平均年龄为(45.9 ± 11)岁,偏头痛平均持续时间为(29.2 ± 12.4)年。换药前使用第一种 mAb 的平均时间为 10.4 ± 4.9 个月。最常见的转换是艾伦单抗-加卡尼珠单抗38例(42.2%)和艾伦单抗-非马尼珠单抗21例(23.3%)。疗效不佳(50/90,55.6%)或耐受性不佳(40/90,44.4%)是导致换药的原因。导致停药的最常见不良事件(AE)是便秘和流感样综合征,各占 16 例(40%)。10 名患者(11.1%)的 MHD 反应率(RR)为 30%-50%,32 名患者(35.6%)的反应率≥50%,48 名患者(53.3%)的反应率为 <30%。换药后,MHD(20 [IQR:15-29] vs 13 [IQR:7-23]; p <.001)和每月偏头痛天数(15 [IQR:12-20] vs 10 [IQR:7-16]; p <.001)明显减少。换药后,38 例(42.2%)患者出现 AEs,但在因耐受性不足而停药的患者中,50% 的耐受性有所改善。结论对于因缺乏有效性/耐受性而停用 CGRP-mAbs 的偏头痛难治性患者,转换可能是一种个体化策略。本研究为越来越多的转换证据提供了支持性数据,并强调了未来的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信