Optimal intensity measure for seismic performance assessment of shield tunnels in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yiyao Shen , M. Hesham El Naggar , Dongmei Zhang , Zhongkai Huang , Xiuli Du
{"title":"Optimal intensity measure for seismic performance assessment of shield tunnels in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils","authors":"Yiyao Shen ,&nbsp;M. Hesham El Naggar ,&nbsp;Dongmei Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhongkai Huang ,&nbsp;Xiuli Du","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Relating the ground motion intensity measure (IM) and the structural engineering demand parameter is a crucial step in the performance-based earthquake engineering framework. This study investigates the selection of IM for development of probabilistic seismic demand model of urban shield tunnels subjected to earthquake ground motions in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils. Nonlinear dynamic effective stress analyses are conducted to develop a database of the intensity measures and structural seismic responses exposed to ground shaking and soil liquefaction. Two advanced soil constitutive models (i.e., Pressure DependMultiYield03 and PressureIndependMultiYield for liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils, respectively) are employed to capture the nonlinear behavior. A suite of 23 ground motion intensity measures is selected and assessed based on the evaluation criteria of correlation, efficiency, practicality and proficiency. Eventually, the multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is employed to comprehensively consider the four evaluation criteria and establish the optimal ground motion IM suitable for probabilistic seismic demand analysis of shield tunnel structures. The obtained results show that the sustained maximum acceleration is the optimal IM for evaluating the structural seismic response, followed by the peak ground acceleration in both liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils. Peak pseudo velocity spectrum, displacement square integral and Housner spectral intensity are found to be not suitable for the probabilistic seismic demand analysis of shield tunnel structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"21 ","pages":"Pages 149-163"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246796742400076X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relating the ground motion intensity measure (IM) and the structural engineering demand parameter is a crucial step in the performance-based earthquake engineering framework. This study investigates the selection of IM for development of probabilistic seismic demand model of urban shield tunnels subjected to earthquake ground motions in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils. Nonlinear dynamic effective stress analyses are conducted to develop a database of the intensity measures and structural seismic responses exposed to ground shaking and soil liquefaction. Two advanced soil constitutive models (i.e., Pressure DependMultiYield03 and PressureIndependMultiYield for liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils, respectively) are employed to capture the nonlinear behavior. A suite of 23 ground motion intensity measures is selected and assessed based on the evaluation criteria of correlation, efficiency, practicality and proficiency. Eventually, the multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is employed to comprehensively consider the four evaluation criteria and establish the optimal ground motion IM suitable for probabilistic seismic demand analysis of shield tunnel structures. The obtained results show that the sustained maximum acceleration is the optimal IM for evaluating the structural seismic response, followed by the peak ground acceleration in both liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils. Peak pseudo velocity spectrum, displacement square integral and Housner spectral intensity are found to be not suitable for the probabilistic seismic demand analysis of shield tunnel structures.
可液化和不可液化土壤中盾构隧道抗震性能评估的最佳烈度测量方法
地震动烈度测量(IM)与结构工程需求参数之间的关系是基于性能的地震工程框架的关键步骤。本研究探讨了在可液化土和非可液化土的地震地面运动中,如何选择地震动烈度来建立城市盾构隧道的概率地震需求模型。通过非线性动态有效应力分析,建立了地震动和土壤液化的烈度测量和结构地震响应数据库。为捕捉非线性行为,采用了两种先进的土壤构成模型(即分别用于可液化土壤和不可液化土壤的 Pressure DependMultiYield03 和 PressureIndependMultiYield)。根据相关性、效率、实用性和熟练程度等评价标准,选择并评估了一套 23 种地面运动强度测量方法。最后,采用多层次模糊综合评价方法,综合考虑四个评价标准,建立了适用于盾构隧道结构概率地震需求分析的最优地震动 IM。结果表明,在可液化土和非可液化土中,持续最大加速度是评价结构地震反应的最优地动IM,其次是峰值地动加速度。峰值伪速度谱、位移平方积分和 Housner 频谱强度不适合盾构隧道结构的概率地震需求分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信