Questionnaires of the Society for Assistance to Victims of Intervention on Crimes Committed Near Tsaritsyn in 1918 as a Historical Source

M. Shumakov
{"title":"Questionnaires of the Society for Assistance to Victims of Intervention on Crimes Committed Near Tsaritsyn in 1918 as a Historical Source","authors":"M. Shumakov","doi":"10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article examines the activities of the Society for Assistance to Victims of Intervention in 1918 in Tsaritsyn and the surrounding regions. The question of the creation of Society and the purposes of its work is briefly considered. This is a Soviet public organization created to identify the negative consequences of intervention and substantiate the counter-claims of the USSR to capitalist countries. As part of their activities, representatives of the society interviewed victims of the actions of the interventionists, white armies, and other opponents of Soviet power. Methods and materials. The publication presents the results of the study of questionnaires that were collected in the specified chronological and geographical framework and were deposited in the GA of the Russian Federation. Analysis. The structure of the article corresponds to the structure of the society questionnaires. First, information about the social composition of the surveyed citizens is presented. Then the issue of persons responsible for causing damage was considered (based on information from the column “circumstances of the damage suffered”). There is information here about both specific commanders and military formations. After that, the places where the cases of material and physical damage have the greatest density are determined. The circumstances of causing damage to citizens in the village of Mikhailovka, on the farm Kalach, etc. are considered in detail. The circumstances that caused the damage to the population and the evidence presented by the applicants in support of their words are also considered separately. Finally, questions were raised about the legal procedure that accompanied the collection of questionnaires and their acceptance into work, about the processing of questionnaires on the Society Board, and about the statistical data collected by Society employees in the vicinity of Tsaritsyn in 1918. Results. The article reveals the nature of the work of the Society for Assistance to Victims of the Revolution, using the example of the South of Russia. The study of this issue will allow us to look at the Civil War from the perspective of an ordinary member of society and supplement the plots developed in historiography (such as the defense of Tsaritsyn, etc.) with new information.","PeriodicalId":515910,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article examines the activities of the Society for Assistance to Victims of Intervention in 1918 in Tsaritsyn and the surrounding regions. The question of the creation of Society and the purposes of its work is briefly considered. This is a Soviet public organization created to identify the negative consequences of intervention and substantiate the counter-claims of the USSR to capitalist countries. As part of their activities, representatives of the society interviewed victims of the actions of the interventionists, white armies, and other opponents of Soviet power. Methods and materials. The publication presents the results of the study of questionnaires that were collected in the specified chronological and geographical framework and were deposited in the GA of the Russian Federation. Analysis. The structure of the article corresponds to the structure of the society questionnaires. First, information about the social composition of the surveyed citizens is presented. Then the issue of persons responsible for causing damage was considered (based on information from the column “circumstances of the damage suffered”). There is information here about both specific commanders and military formations. After that, the places where the cases of material and physical damage have the greatest density are determined. The circumstances of causing damage to citizens in the village of Mikhailovka, on the farm Kalach, etc. are considered in detail. The circumstances that caused the damage to the population and the evidence presented by the applicants in support of their words are also considered separately. Finally, questions were raised about the legal procedure that accompanied the collection of questionnaires and their acceptance into work, about the processing of questionnaires on the Society Board, and about the statistical data collected by Society employees in the vicinity of Tsaritsyn in 1918. Results. The article reveals the nature of the work of the Society for Assistance to Victims of the Revolution, using the example of the South of Russia. The study of this issue will allow us to look at the Civil War from the perspective of an ordinary member of society and supplement the plots developed in historiography (such as the defense of Tsaritsyn, etc.) with new information.
干预受害者援助协会关于 1918 年在察里津附近所犯罪行的调查问卷作为历史资料
简介文章探讨了 1918 年援助察里津及周边地区干涉受害者协会的活动。文章简要介绍了该协会的成立及其工作宗旨。这是一个苏联公共组织,成立的目的是查明干涉的负面影响,并证实苏联对资本主义国家的反诉。作为其活动的一部分,该协会的代表采访了干预者、白军和其他苏维埃政权反对者行动的受害者。方法和材料。该出版物介绍了在规定的时间和地理框架内收集的调查问卷的研究结果,这些问卷存放在俄罗斯联邦总检察院。分析。文章的结构与社会调查问卷的结构一致。首先,介绍了被调查公民的社会构成信息。然后考虑造成损害的责任人问题(根据 "遭受损害的情况 "一栏的信息)。这里既有关于具体指挥官的信息,也有关于军事编队的信息。之后,确定了物质和人身损害案件密度最大的地点。对米哈伊洛夫卡村、卡拉奇农场等地公民遭受损害的情况进行了详细研究。还分别审议了对居民造成损害的情况以及申请人为支持其言论而提供的证据。最后,还就问卷收集和接受工作的法律程序、协会委员会对问卷的处理以及协会雇员 1918 年在察里津附近收集的统计数据提出了问题。结果。文章以俄罗斯南部为例,揭示了革命受害者援助协会的工作性质。通过对这一问题的研究,我们可以从一个普通社会成员的视角来看待内战,并用新的信息来补充历史学中形成的情节(如察里津保卫战等)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信