Evidence of back-folding in the Beas Valley puts Himalayan tectonic models on trial

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arun Kumar Ojha , Deepak Srivastava , Marnie Forster , Gordon Lister
{"title":"Evidence of back-folding in the Beas Valley puts Himalayan tectonic models on trial","authors":"Arun Kumar Ojha ,&nbsp;Deepak Srivastava ,&nbsp;Marnie Forster ,&nbsp;Gordon Lister","doi":"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Field structural observations from the Himachal Himalaya, in the northwest of the mountain belt, challenge existing tectonic models and raise questions as to their validity. Microstructures and geochronological data reveal two discrete episodes of Barrovian metamorphism, the earliest during the Eocene-Oligocene transition, before an early period of recumbent folding. This metamorphic event occurred in association with a km-scale extensional ductile shear zone that is itself now recumbently folded on the km-scale, with an axial plane pressure solution cleavage. The Eocene-Oligocene gneiss complex is thus exposed in its core. The second episode of Barrovian metamorphism occurred in association with another regional-scale extensional shear zone during the Oligo-Miocene transition, thus synchronous to the South Tibetan Detachment System. This transects the recumbent fold stack. Microstructures show that the Main Central Thrust was initiated after the second phase of extension, and the associated second episode of Barrovian metamorphism had ceased operating. Further, the previously unrecognized km-scale Phojal Back-fold affects all of the above structures. Confusion caused by the misidentification of this structure led to the tectonic-wedge model, but this hypothesis can be invalidated by the structural evidence presented here. Our data support an alternative hypothesis that requires tectonic mode-switches in association with a succession of accretion events as India indents into Eurasia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Geology","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 105217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019181412400169X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Field structural observations from the Himachal Himalaya, in the northwest of the mountain belt, challenge existing tectonic models and raise questions as to their validity. Microstructures and geochronological data reveal two discrete episodes of Barrovian metamorphism, the earliest during the Eocene-Oligocene transition, before an early period of recumbent folding. This metamorphic event occurred in association with a km-scale extensional ductile shear zone that is itself now recumbently folded on the km-scale, with an axial plane pressure solution cleavage. The Eocene-Oligocene gneiss complex is thus exposed in its core. The second episode of Barrovian metamorphism occurred in association with another regional-scale extensional shear zone during the Oligo-Miocene transition, thus synchronous to the South Tibetan Detachment System. This transects the recumbent fold stack. Microstructures show that the Main Central Thrust was initiated after the second phase of extension, and the associated second episode of Barrovian metamorphism had ceased operating. Further, the previously unrecognized km-scale Phojal Back-fold affects all of the above structures. Confusion caused by the misidentification of this structure led to the tectonic-wedge model, but this hypothesis can be invalidated by the structural evidence presented here. Our data support an alternative hypothesis that requires tectonic mode-switches in association with a succession of accretion events as India indents into Eurasia.

比斯河谷的反褶证据使喜马拉雅构造模型面临考验
对喜马拉雅山带西北部喜马偕尔喜马拉雅山的实地构造观察挑战了现有的构造模型,并对其有效性提出了质疑。微观结构和地质年代数据揭示了两段不连续的巴罗维变质作用,最早的变质作用发生在始新世-更新世过渡时期,之后是早期的伏褶作用。这一变质作用与千米尺度的伸展韧性剪切带有关,而该剪切带本身现在也在千米尺度上发生褶皱,并伴有轴向平面压力解理劈裂。因此,始新世-更新世片麻岩复合体在其核心部位出露。巴罗维变质作用的第二个阶段是在渐新世-中新世过渡时期与另一个区域规模的延伸剪切带同时发生的,因此与藏南脱落系同步。这条剪切带横穿了褶皱堆积层。显微构造显示,中央主推山是在第二阶段延伸之后开始的,与之相关的第二期巴罗维变质作用已经停止。此外,之前未被确认的千米级 Phojal 后褶皱也影响了上述所有结构。对这一构造的错误识别导致了构造-楔形模型的产生,但本文提供的构造证据可以推翻这一假说。我们的数据支持另一种假说,即在印度向欧亚大陆凹陷的过程中,构造模式的转换需要与连续的增生事件相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Geology
Journal of Structural Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
19.40%
发文量
192
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structural Geology publishes process-oriented investigations about structural geology using appropriate combinations of analog and digital field data, seismic reflection data, satellite-derived data, geometric analysis, kinematic analysis, laboratory experiments, computer visualizations, and analogue or numerical modelling on all scales. Contributions are encouraged to draw perspectives from rheology, rock mechanics, geophysics,metamorphism, sedimentology, petroleum geology, economic geology, geodynamics, planetary geology, tectonics and neotectonics to provide a more powerful understanding of deformation processes and systems. Given the visual nature of the discipline, supplementary materials that portray the data and analysis in 3-D or quasi 3-D manners, including the use of videos, and/or graphical abstracts can significantly strengthen the impact of contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信