Assessment and optimization of maximum magnitude forecasting models for induced seismicity in enhanced geothermal systems: The Gonghe EGS project in Qinghai, China

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Xinxin Yin , Changsheng Jiang , Fengling Yin , Hongyu Zhai , Yu Zheng , Haidong Wu , Xue Niu , Yan Zhang , Cong Jiang , Jingwei Li
{"title":"Assessment and optimization of maximum magnitude forecasting models for induced seismicity in enhanced geothermal systems: The Gonghe EGS project in Qinghai, China","authors":"Xinxin Yin ,&nbsp;Changsheng Jiang ,&nbsp;Fengling Yin ,&nbsp;Hongyu Zhai ,&nbsp;Yu Zheng ,&nbsp;Haidong Wu ,&nbsp;Xue Niu ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Cong Jiang ,&nbsp;Jingwei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.tecto.2024.230438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seismic activity induced during the development of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) is frequent and poses significant hazards. This study aims to accurately forecast the maximum magnitude (<em>M</em><sub>max</sub>) of induced earthquakes to effectively manage seismic risks. Focusing on the EGS project in Gonghe County, Qinghai Province, we evaluated and optimized various widely-applied <em>M</em><sub>max</sub> forecasting models, while also endeavoring to directly forecast maximum magnitudes in the post-closure phase. Initially, advanced deep learning models (such as PhaseNet and GaMMA) were employed to process seismic data, coupled with VELEST and HypoDD methods for earthquake relocation. Subsequently, four currently widely recognized maximum magnitude (<em>M</em><sub>max</sub>) forecasting models (H14, NRBE, V16, and G17) were utilized to forecast and assess <em>M</em><sub>max</sub> during nine hydraulic fracturing stages, six post-closure stages exhibiting tailing effects, and the entirety of the 2019–2021 period in the Gonghe EGS project. The findings indicate significant disparities in the efficacy of different forecasting models during hydraulic fracturing stages, with no model fully aligning with the complex physical mechanisms of induced seismicity. NRBE and G17 models tend to overestimate <em>M</em><sub>max</sub> forecasting, potentially escalating production costs, whereas H14 and V16 models yield results closer to actual values but are susceptible to the influence of real seismic breakthroughs. Furthermore, distinct discrepancies were observed in the <em>M</em><sub>max</sub> forecasting performance of the same model between hydraulic fracturing and post-closure stages. Attempts to directly forecast <em>M</em><sub>max</sub> post-closure achieved certain efficacy, likely due to the cumulative injection volume exerting a degree of control over induced seismic activity in both stages. Lastly, to overcome limitations in current <em>M</em><sub>max</sub> forecasting models, a hybrid model Y24, integrating the advantages of four forecasting models, was proposed, demonstrating higher accuracy and reliability in forecasting during both hydraulic fracturing and post-closure stages. The study's findings provide crucial technical support and decision-making basis for the seismic risk management of EGS projects or shale gas development projects employing hydraulic fracturing, underscoring their significance in ensuring the safety and sustainability of new energy and resource development endeavors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22257,"journal":{"name":"Tectonophysics","volume":"886 ","pages":"Article 230438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tectonophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195124002403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic activity induced during the development of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) is frequent and poses significant hazards. This study aims to accurately forecast the maximum magnitude (Mmax) of induced earthquakes to effectively manage seismic risks. Focusing on the EGS project in Gonghe County, Qinghai Province, we evaluated and optimized various widely-applied Mmax forecasting models, while also endeavoring to directly forecast maximum magnitudes in the post-closure phase. Initially, advanced deep learning models (such as PhaseNet and GaMMA) were employed to process seismic data, coupled with VELEST and HypoDD methods for earthquake relocation. Subsequently, four currently widely recognized maximum magnitude (Mmax) forecasting models (H14, NRBE, V16, and G17) were utilized to forecast and assess Mmax during nine hydraulic fracturing stages, six post-closure stages exhibiting tailing effects, and the entirety of the 2019–2021 period in the Gonghe EGS project. The findings indicate significant disparities in the efficacy of different forecasting models during hydraulic fracturing stages, with no model fully aligning with the complex physical mechanisms of induced seismicity. NRBE and G17 models tend to overestimate Mmax forecasting, potentially escalating production costs, whereas H14 and V16 models yield results closer to actual values but are susceptible to the influence of real seismic breakthroughs. Furthermore, distinct discrepancies were observed in the Mmax forecasting performance of the same model between hydraulic fracturing and post-closure stages. Attempts to directly forecast Mmax post-closure achieved certain efficacy, likely due to the cumulative injection volume exerting a degree of control over induced seismic activity in both stages. Lastly, to overcome limitations in current Mmax forecasting models, a hybrid model Y24, integrating the advantages of four forecasting models, was proposed, demonstrating higher accuracy and reliability in forecasting during both hydraulic fracturing and post-closure stages. The study's findings provide crucial technical support and decision-making basis for the seismic risk management of EGS projects or shale gas development projects employing hydraulic fracturing, underscoring their significance in ensuring the safety and sustainability of new energy and resource development endeavors.

增强型地热系统诱发地震最大震级预测模型的评估与优化:中国青海共和 EGS 项目
在开发强化地热系统(EGS)过程中诱发的地震活动频繁发生,并造成重大危害。本研究旨在准确预测诱发地震的最大震级(Mmax),以有效管理地震风险。我们以青海省共和县的 EGS 项目为重点,评估并优化了各种广泛应用的 Mmax 预报模型,同时还致力于直接预报关闭后阶段的最大震级。最初,我们采用了先进的深度学习模型(如 PhaseNet 和 GaMMA)来处理地震数据,并结合 VELEST 和 HypoDD 方法进行地震定位。随后,利用目前广泛认可的四种最大震级(Mmax)预测模型(H14、NRBE、V16 和 G17)预测和评估了宫河 EGS 项目九个水力压裂阶段、六个表现出尾矿效应的关闭后阶段以及整个 2019-2021 年期间的最大震级。研究结果表明,在水力压裂阶段,不同预测模型的功效存在显著差异,没有一个模型完全符合诱发地震的复杂物理机制。NRBE 和 G17 模型倾向于高估 Mmax 预测值,可能会增加生产成本;而 H14 和 V16 模型得出的结果更接近实际值,但容易受到实际地震破裂的影响。此外,同一模型在水力压裂和封井后阶段的Mmax预测性能也存在明显差异。尝试直接预测关闭后的最大震级取得了一定的效果,这可能是由于累积注入量在一定程度上控制了这两个阶段的诱发地震活动。最后,为了克服当前 Mmax 预测模型的局限性,提出了一种混合模型 Y24,综合了四种预测模型的优点,在水力压裂和封井后两个阶段都表现出了更高的预测精度和可靠性。研究结果为采用水力压裂技术的 EGS 项目或页岩气开发项目的地震风险管理提供了重要的技术支持和决策依据,对确保新能源和资源开发工作的安全性和可持续性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tectonophysics
Tectonophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The prime focus of Tectonophysics will be high-impact original research and reviews in the fields of kinematics, structure, composition, and dynamics of the solid arth at all scales. Tectonophysics particularly encourages submission of papers based on the integration of a multitude of geophysical, geological, geochemical, geodynamic, and geotectonic methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信