Long-term course of ambulatory patients with COVID-19 initially treated with enoxaparin vs no anticoagulation: final analysis of the OVID (enoxaparin for outpatients with COVID-19) randomized trial

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
{"title":"Long-term course of ambulatory patients with COVID-19 initially treated with enoxaparin vs no anticoagulation: final analysis of the OVID (enoxaparin for outpatients with COVID-19) randomized trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early thromboprophylaxis does not prevent hospital admissions and death among outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. Its impact on long-term outcomes, including long COVID symptoms and performance status, is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the long-term effects of thromboprophylaxis given at the time of acute COVID-19 in outpatients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The OVID (enoxaparin for outpatients with COVID-19) trial randomized outpatients older than 50 years with acute COVID-19 to receive either subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for 14 days or standard of care (no thromboprophylaxis). In this follow-up study, we assessed the 2-year outcomes, including all-cause hospitalization and death, cardiovascular events, long COVID symptoms, and functional limitations based on the Post–COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale and EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 469 potentially eligible patients, 468 survived, of whom 439 (mean age 59 years; 54% men) participated in the Post-OVID study. There was no difference in terms of hospitalization and death (8.3% in the treatment group vs 10% in controls; relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.5-1.5) and of cardiovascular events between groups. The risk of presenting with long COVID symptoms was similar in the 2 groups (44% in the treatment group vs 47% in the standard of care group), with no difference between groups also concerning individual symptoms. A PCFS grade of 1 to 3, indicating light-to-moderate functional limitation, was recorded in 15% of patients in each group (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.6-1.7). No patients reported severe limitations (PCFS grade 4). Median EuroQol visual analog scale score was 85 on 100 points (IQR, 80-90 for the standard of care group and 75-90 for the enoxaparin group).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early thromboprophylaxis does not improve long-term, 2-year clinical and functional outcomes among symptomatic ambulatory patients with acute COVID-19.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002292/pdfft?md5=78a9485fad920c47ba38a0f625250766&pid=1-s2.0-S2475037924002292-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early thromboprophylaxis does not prevent hospital admissions and death among outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. Its impact on long-term outcomes, including long COVID symptoms and performance status, is unknown.

Objectives

To assess the long-term effects of thromboprophylaxis given at the time of acute COVID-19 in outpatients.

Methods

The OVID (enoxaparin for outpatients with COVID-19) trial randomized outpatients older than 50 years with acute COVID-19 to receive either subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for 14 days or standard of care (no thromboprophylaxis). In this follow-up study, we assessed the 2-year outcomes, including all-cause hospitalization and death, cardiovascular events, long COVID symptoms, and functional limitations based on the Post–COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale and EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels scale.

Results

Of 469 potentially eligible patients, 468 survived, of whom 439 (mean age 59 years; 54% men) participated in the Post-OVID study. There was no difference in terms of hospitalization and death (8.3% in the treatment group vs 10% in controls; relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.5-1.5) and of cardiovascular events between groups. The risk of presenting with long COVID symptoms was similar in the 2 groups (44% in the treatment group vs 47% in the standard of care group), with no difference between groups also concerning individual symptoms. A PCFS grade of 1 to 3, indicating light-to-moderate functional limitation, was recorded in 15% of patients in each group (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.6-1.7). No patients reported severe limitations (PCFS grade 4). Median EuroQol visual analog scale score was 85 on 100 points (IQR, 80-90 for the standard of care group and 75-90 for the enoxaparin group).

Conclusion

Early thromboprophylaxis does not improve long-term, 2-year clinical and functional outcomes among symptomatic ambulatory patients with acute COVID-19.

最初接受依诺肝素治疗与不接受抗凝治疗的 COVID-19 非卧床患者的长期疗程:OVID 随机试验的最终分析
背景早期血栓预防并不能防止有症状的COVID-19门诊患者入院和死亡。方法 OVID(针对 COVID-19 门诊患者的依诺肝素)试验将 50 岁以上的急性 COVID-19 门诊患者随机分为两种,一种是皮下注射依诺肝素 40 毫克,每天一次,持续 14 天,另一种是标准护理(不采取血栓预防措施)。在这项随访研究中,我们评估了 2 年的结果,包括全因住院和死亡、心血管事件、长期 COVID 症状以及基于后 COVID-19 功能状态 (PCFS) 量表和 EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels 量表的功能限制。两组患者在住院和死亡(治疗组为 8.3%,对照组为 10%;相对风险为 0.83;95% CI 为 0.5-1.5)以及心血管事件方面没有差异。两组患者出现长期 COVID 症状的风险相似(治疗组为 44%,标准护理组为 47%),组间在单个症状方面也无差异。两组中均有 15% 的患者的 PCFS 分级为 1 至 3 级,即轻度至中度功能受限(几率比 0.98;95% CI,0.6-1.7)。没有患者报告出现严重功能限制(PCFS 4 级)。EuroQol视觉模拟评分中位数为85分(100分)(IQR,标准护理组为80-90分,依诺肝素组为75-90分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信