The skin tears knowledge among geriatric ward nurses and associated factors: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Rong Hu , Xiaoying Zhong, Xiaoya Li , Yanfei Ma, Huilin He, Chunyan Wang, Fang He
{"title":"The skin tears knowledge among geriatric ward nurses and associated factors: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Rong Hu ,&nbsp;Xiaoying Zhong,&nbsp;Xiaoya Li ,&nbsp;Yanfei Ma,&nbsp;Huilin He,&nbsp;Chunyan Wang,&nbsp;Fang He","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the level of knowledge about skin tears among geriatric ward nurses and identify associated factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cross-sectional study in Southwest China, 1172 geriatric ward nurses from 10 hospitals participated. Data were collected using Sojump, a Chinese web-based platform, and the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument was used to assess their knowledge. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study involved participants with an average age of 36.73 (SD = 6.54) years. More than half of the participants had less than 10 years of experience in geriatric wards. 27 % specialized in wound care, and 68.1 % lacked specific training in skin tear (ST) knowledge. Additionally, 82.7 % of geriatric nurses had never been exposed to guidelines on ST prevention and management. In the geriatric ward, 36.6 % of nurses received training in ST prevention. The average knowledge score about Skin Tears (STs) was 9.52 (SD = 2.39) out of 18. 'Treatment' had the lowest mean score, while 'Specific patient groups' had the highest. The multiple linear regression analysis found that nurses' knowledge of STs was influenced by sex(β = 0.096, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), educational level(β = 0.062, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), participation in ST (β = −0.193, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 and wound care training(β = −0.120, <em>P</em> = 0.004), and specialization as a wound care nurse(β = −0.350, <em>P</em> = 0.001). These factors explained 61.3 % of the variance in knowledge about STs among the participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The geriatric ward had limited knowledge of STs. To improve their skills in dealing with STs, managers should provide tailored training to nurses and establish a standardized, evidence-based nursing process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 1012-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X24001207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To determine the level of knowledge about skin tears among geriatric ward nurses and identify associated factors.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study in Southwest China, 1172 geriatric ward nurses from 10 hospitals participated. Data were collected using Sojump, a Chinese web-based platform, and the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument was used to assess their knowledge. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression.

Results

The study involved participants with an average age of 36.73 (SD = 6.54) years. More than half of the participants had less than 10 years of experience in geriatric wards. 27 % specialized in wound care, and 68.1 % lacked specific training in skin tear (ST) knowledge. Additionally, 82.7 % of geriatric nurses had never been exposed to guidelines on ST prevention and management. In the geriatric ward, 36.6 % of nurses received training in ST prevention. The average knowledge score about Skin Tears (STs) was 9.52 (SD = 2.39) out of 18. 'Treatment' had the lowest mean score, while 'Specific patient groups' had the highest. The multiple linear regression analysis found that nurses' knowledge of STs was influenced by sex(β = 0.096, P < 0.001), educational level(β = 0.062, P < 0.001), participation in ST (β = −0.193, P < 0.001 and wound care training(β = −0.120, P = 0.004), and specialization as a wound care nurse(β = −0.350, P = 0.001). These factors explained 61.3 % of the variance in knowledge about STs among the participants.

Conclusion

The geriatric ward had limited knowledge of STs. To improve their skills in dealing with STs, managers should provide tailored training to nurses and establish a standardized, evidence-based nursing process.
老年病房护士对皮肤裂伤的认识及相关因素:一项横断面研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of tissue viability
Journal of tissue viability DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management. The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信