How dairy heifers initially respond to freestalls: The effect of neck-rail placement

Marek Gaworski , Kathryn McLellan , Marina A.G. von Keyserlingk , Daniel M. Weary
{"title":"How dairy heifers initially respond to freestalls: The effect of neck-rail placement","authors":"Marek Gaworski ,&nbsp;Kathryn McLellan ,&nbsp;Marina A.G. von Keyserlingk ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Weary","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dairy heifers are often kept on open packs early in life and later transitioned to freestalls. The neck rail in freestalls acts as a barrier intended to prevent animals from entering too far in the stall, with the aim of improving stall cleanliness. Unfortunately, this barrier can hinder stall use and may be a hazard to animals due to physical contact, perhaps especially when animals first learn to use the stall. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 2 different neck-rail positions on frequency of stall use (for lying and standing) and misuse (standing or lying backward in the stall and lying down outside of the stall) by dairy heifers when first introduced to freestall housing. A secondary aim was to measure, via the use of an instrumented neck rail, the maximum force (N) with which heifers contacted this part of the stall. Holstein heifers (n = 8 per treatment) were randomly assigned to one of 2 neck-rail positions: 110 and 130 cm (as measured diagonally from the inside of the rear curb to the bottom of the instrumented neck rail, 0.7 m above the bedded stall surface). Animals were tested individually and responses were measured for 6 h following introduction to the freestalls. On average (median, minimum, maximum), heifers lay down 3.5 (0, 6) times in the freestall when the neck rail was positioned at 130 cm versus 0 (0, 4) times at 110 cm. Heifers also were more likely to stand fully in the stall when the neck rail was positioned at 130 cm versus 110 cm (3.5, 0, 9 vs. 1, 0, 3), and were also more likely to stand backward in the stall (3, 0, 5 vs. 0, 0, 1). In contrast, heifers tested at the 130 cm position were rarely observed lying down outside of the stall (1, 0, 4), whereas this behavior was more common at the 110 cm treatment (4, 0, 7). Contrary to our expectation, the force with which heifers contacted the neck rail was higher in the 130 cm versus 110 cm treatment (337, 6, 548 vs. 78, 26, 403 N). We conclude that neck-rail position acts as a barrier for naïve heifers, such that a more restrictive position reduces the likelihood that heifers use the stall correctly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 95-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224001224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dairy heifers are often kept on open packs early in life and later transitioned to freestalls. The neck rail in freestalls acts as a barrier intended to prevent animals from entering too far in the stall, with the aim of improving stall cleanliness. Unfortunately, this barrier can hinder stall use and may be a hazard to animals due to physical contact, perhaps especially when animals first learn to use the stall. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 2 different neck-rail positions on frequency of stall use (for lying and standing) and misuse (standing or lying backward in the stall and lying down outside of the stall) by dairy heifers when first introduced to freestall housing. A secondary aim was to measure, via the use of an instrumented neck rail, the maximum force (N) with which heifers contacted this part of the stall. Holstein heifers (n = 8 per treatment) were randomly assigned to one of 2 neck-rail positions: 110 and 130 cm (as measured diagonally from the inside of the rear curb to the bottom of the instrumented neck rail, 0.7 m above the bedded stall surface). Animals were tested individually and responses were measured for 6 h following introduction to the freestalls. On average (median, minimum, maximum), heifers lay down 3.5 (0, 6) times in the freestall when the neck rail was positioned at 130 cm versus 0 (0, 4) times at 110 cm. Heifers also were more likely to stand fully in the stall when the neck rail was positioned at 130 cm versus 110 cm (3.5, 0, 9 vs. 1, 0, 3), and were also more likely to stand backward in the stall (3, 0, 5 vs. 0, 0, 1). In contrast, heifers tested at the 130 cm position were rarely observed lying down outside of the stall (1, 0, 4), whereas this behavior was more common at the 110 cm treatment (4, 0, 7). Contrary to our expectation, the force with which heifers contacted the neck rail was higher in the 130 cm versus 110 cm treatment (337, 6, 548 vs. 78, 26, 403 N). We conclude that neck-rail position acts as a barrier for naïve heifers, such that a more restrictive position reduces the likelihood that heifers use the stall correctly.
乳用小母牛最初如何对自由栏做出反应:颈栏位置的影响
乳牛通常在生命早期就被养在开放式的小窝里,后来过渡到自由式小窝。自由式马厩的颈栏作为一个屏障,旨在防止动物进入马厩太远,目的是提高马厩的清洁度。不幸的是,这种屏障会阻碍隔间的使用,并且由于身体接触可能对动物构成危险,尤其是当动物第一次学习使用隔间时。本研究的主要目的是调查两种不同的颈栏位置对奶牛首次被引入独立式围栏时使用隔间(躺着和站着)和滥用(站着或倒着在隔间内和躺在隔间外)频率的影响。第二个目的是通过使用仪器颈轨来测量小母牛接触畜栏这部分的最大力(N)。荷斯坦小母牛(每次处理n = 8头)被随机分配到2个颈栏位置中的一个:110和130厘米(从后路边内侧到仪表颈栏底部对角线测量,高于床栏表面0.7米)。分别对动物进行测试,并在引入自由体后6小时内测量动物的反应。平均(中位数、最小值、最大值),当颈栏位于130厘米时,小牛在自由泳中下蛋3.5(0.6)次,而在110厘米时则为0(0.4)次。小母牛也更有可能完全站在摊位脖子铁路时定位在130厘米和110厘米(3.5、0、9和1 0 3),和也更容易向后站在摊位(3 0 5和0 0 1)。相比之下,小母牛测试在130厘米的位置很少观察到躺下以外的摊位(1 0 4),而这种行为是更常见的在110厘米(4 0 7)治疗。与我们的期望相反,在130厘米处与110厘米处相比,小母牛接触颈栏的力更高(337、6、548比78、26、403 N)。我们得出结论,颈栏位置对naïve小母牛起到了屏障作用,因此,限制性更强的位置降低了小母牛正确使用畜栏的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信