Predicting Choroidal Nevus Transformation to Melanoma Using Machine Learning

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Prashant D. Tailor MD , Piotr K. Kopinski MD, PhD , Haley S. D’Souza MD , David A. Leske MS , Timothy W. Olsen MD , Carol L. Shields MD , Jerry A. Shields MD , Lauren A. Dalvin MD
{"title":"Predicting Choroidal Nevus Transformation to Melanoma Using Machine Learning","authors":"Prashant D. Tailor MD ,&nbsp;Piotr K. Kopinski MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Haley S. D’Souza MD ,&nbsp;David A. Leske MS ,&nbsp;Timothy W. Olsen MD ,&nbsp;Carol L. Shields MD ,&nbsp;Jerry A. Shields MD ,&nbsp;Lauren A. Dalvin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma based on multimodal imaging at initial presentation.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective multicenter study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients diagnosed with choroidal nevus on the Ocular Oncology Service at Wills Eye Hospital (2007–2017) or Mayo Clinic Rochester (2015–2023).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Multimodal imaging was obtained, including fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain OCT, and B-scan ultrasonography. Machine learning models were created (XGBoost, LGBM, Random Forest, Extra Tree) and optimized for area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Wills Eye Hospital cohort was used for training and testing (80% training–20% testing) with fivefold cross validation. The Mayo Clinic cohort provided external validation. Model performance was characterized by AUROC and area under precision–recall curve (AUPRC). Models were interrogated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify the features most predictive of conversion from nevus to melanoma. Differences in AUROC and AUPRC between models were tested using 10 000 bootstrap samples with replacement and results.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Area under receiver operating curve and AUPRC for each ML model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 2870 nevi included in the study, with conversion to melanoma confirmed in 128 cases. Simple AI Nevus Transformation System (SAINTS; XGBoost) was the top-performing model in the test cohort [pooled AUROC 0.864 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.864–0.865), pooled AUPRC 0.244 (95% CI: 0.243–0.246)] and in the external validation cohort [pooled AUROC 0.931 (95% CI: 0.930–0.931), pooled AUPRC 0.533 (95% CI: 0.531–0.535)]. Other models also had good discriminative performance: LGBM (test set pooled AUROC 0.831, validation set pooled AUROC 0.815), Random Forest (test set pooled AUROC 0.812, validation set pooled AUROC 0.866), and Extra Tree (test set pooled AUROC 0.826, validation set pooled AUROC 0.915). A model including only nevi with at least 5 years of follow-up demonstrated the best performance in AUPRC (test: pooled 0.592 (95% CI: 0.590–0.594); validation: pooled 0.656 [95% CI: 0.655–0.657]). The top 5 features in SAINTS by SHAP values were: tumor thickness, largest tumor basal diameter, tumor shape, distance to optic nerve, and subretinal fluid extent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We demonstrate accuracy and generalizability of a ML model for predicting choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma based on multimodal imaging.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosures</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001209/pdfft?md5=611e184a6e4ec4c46ad3dd1688c15182&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524001209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma based on multimodal imaging at initial presentation.

Design

Retrospective multicenter study.

Participants

Patients diagnosed with choroidal nevus on the Ocular Oncology Service at Wills Eye Hospital (2007–2017) or Mayo Clinic Rochester (2015–2023).

Methods

Multimodal imaging was obtained, including fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain OCT, and B-scan ultrasonography. Machine learning models were created (XGBoost, LGBM, Random Forest, Extra Tree) and optimized for area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Wills Eye Hospital cohort was used for training and testing (80% training–20% testing) with fivefold cross validation. The Mayo Clinic cohort provided external validation. Model performance was characterized by AUROC and area under precision–recall curve (AUPRC). Models were interrogated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify the features most predictive of conversion from nevus to melanoma. Differences in AUROC and AUPRC between models were tested using 10 000 bootstrap samples with replacement and results.

Main Outcome Measures

Area under receiver operating curve and AUPRC for each ML model.

Results

There were 2870 nevi included in the study, with conversion to melanoma confirmed in 128 cases. Simple AI Nevus Transformation System (SAINTS; XGBoost) was the top-performing model in the test cohort [pooled AUROC 0.864 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.864–0.865), pooled AUPRC 0.244 (95% CI: 0.243–0.246)] and in the external validation cohort [pooled AUROC 0.931 (95% CI: 0.930–0.931), pooled AUPRC 0.533 (95% CI: 0.531–0.535)]. Other models also had good discriminative performance: LGBM (test set pooled AUROC 0.831, validation set pooled AUROC 0.815), Random Forest (test set pooled AUROC 0.812, validation set pooled AUROC 0.866), and Extra Tree (test set pooled AUROC 0.826, validation set pooled AUROC 0.915). A model including only nevi with at least 5 years of follow-up demonstrated the best performance in AUPRC (test: pooled 0.592 (95% CI: 0.590–0.594); validation: pooled 0.656 [95% CI: 0.655–0.657]). The top 5 features in SAINTS by SHAP values were: tumor thickness, largest tumor basal diameter, tumor shape, distance to optic nerve, and subretinal fluid extent.

Conclusions

We demonstrate accuracy and generalizability of a ML model for predicting choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma based on multimodal imaging.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

利用机器学习预测脉络膜痣向黑色素瘤的转化
目的开发并验证机器学习(ML)模型,根据初次发病时的多模态成像预测脉络膜痣向黑色素瘤的转化。方法获取多模态成像,包括眼底照相、眼底自动荧光、光谱域 OCT 和 B-scan 超声波检查。创建了机器学习模型(XGBoost、LGBM、随机森林、Extra Tree),并对接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)进行了优化。威尔斯眼科医院队列用于训练和测试(80%训练-20%测试),并进行五倍交叉验证。梅奥诊所队列提供了外部验证。模型性能以 AUROC 和精确度-召回曲线下面积 (AUPRC) 为特征。使用 SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) 对模型进行了检验,以确定哪些特征最能预测痣向黑色素瘤的转化。使用 10,000 个带替换的 Bootstrap 样本对模型之间的 AUROC 和 AUPRC 差异进行了测试,并得出了结果。简单人工智能痣转化系统(SAINTS; XGBoost)是测试队列中表现最好的模型[汇总 AUROC 0.864(95% 置信区间 (CI):0.864-0.865),集合 AUPRC 0.244(95% 置信区间:0.243-0.246)],在外部验证队列中[集合 AUROC 0.931(95% 置信区间:0.930-0.931),集合 AUPRC 0.533(95% 置信区间:0.531-0.535)]表现最好。其他模型也具有良好的判别性能:LGBM(测试集集合 AUROC 0.831,验证集集合 AUROC 0.815)、随机森林(测试集集合 AUROC 0.812,验证集集合 AUROC 0.866)和额外树(测试集集合 AUROC 0.826,验证集集合 AUROC 0.915)。仅包括随访至少 5 年的痣的模型在 AUPRC 方面表现最佳(测试:集合 AUROC 为 0.592(95% CI:0.590-0.594);验证:集合 AUROC 为 0.656 [95% CI:0.655-0.657])。根据 SHAP 值,SAINTS 中的前 5 个特征是:肿瘤厚度、最大肿瘤基底直径、肿瘤形状、与视神经的距离以及视网膜下积液范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信