Industrialisation, Domestic Work and Domestic Industry in the Bohemian Lands at the Turn of the 20th Century

Petr Popelka
{"title":"Industrialisation, Domestic Work and Domestic Industry in the Bohemian Lands at the Turn of the 20th Century","authors":"Petr Popelka","doi":"10.15452/historica.2024.15.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic historians have paid due attention to the phenomenon of domestic work, especially in connection with the theory of proto industrialisation, for decades. However, domestic production has not been a marginal issue even in those economies of European countries that can be considered industrialised. The phenomenon of domestic industry was significant in the Bohemian lands as well as in some other countries of the Habsburg monarchy (e.g. Vorarlberg and Galicia) or East and Southeast Europe until the turn of the 20th century. Both the industrial and protoindustrial forms of production coexisted in the society of Central Europe for a relatively long time. This is what Witold Kula called “the coexistence of anachronisms”. This study focuses on the causes of the persistence of protoindustrial forms of production, their field structure, and gender aspects, as well as on the comparison of data from official statistics and from the period press. Specific examples present domestic work not only as a social problem but also as a strategy to earn a living mainly for country people.","PeriodicalId":339758,"journal":{"name":"Historica. Revue pro historii a příbuzné vědy","volume":"112 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historica. Revue pro historii a příbuzné vědy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15452/historica.2024.15.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic historians have paid due attention to the phenomenon of domestic work, especially in connection with the theory of proto industrialisation, for decades. However, domestic production has not been a marginal issue even in those economies of European countries that can be considered industrialised. The phenomenon of domestic industry was significant in the Bohemian lands as well as in some other countries of the Habsburg monarchy (e.g. Vorarlberg and Galicia) or East and Southeast Europe until the turn of the 20th century. Both the industrial and protoindustrial forms of production coexisted in the society of Central Europe for a relatively long time. This is what Witold Kula called “the coexistence of anachronisms”. This study focuses on the causes of the persistence of protoindustrial forms of production, their field structure, and gender aspects, as well as on the comparison of data from official statistics and from the period press. Specific examples present domestic work not only as a social problem but also as a strategy to earn a living mainly for country people.
20 世纪之交波希米亚地区的工业化、家务劳动和家庭工业
数十年来,经济史学家对家务劳动现象给予了应有的关注,尤其是在原工业化理论方面。然而,即使在那些可被视为工业化的欧洲国家经济中,家务生产也不是一个无关紧要的问题。直到 20 世纪之交,家庭工业现象在波希米亚地区以及哈布斯堡君主国的其他一些国家(如福拉尔贝格州和加利西亚)或东欧和东南欧都非常重要。在中欧社会中,工业生产和原工业生产两种形式并存的时间相对较长。这就是维托尔德-库拉(Witold Kula)所说的 "不合时宜的共存"。本研究的重点是原工业生产方式持续存在的原因、其领域结构和性别方面,以及对官方统计资料和当时新闻界的数据进行比较。具体实例表明,家务劳动不仅是一个社会问题,也是主要为乡村居民谋生的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信