Cytomorphological Features as a Subtyping Tool of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Brushing Bronchoscopic Samples

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Nikola Gardić, Dejan M. Miljković, Aleksandra N. Lovrenski
{"title":"Cytomorphological Features as a Subtyping Tool of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Brushing Bronchoscopic Samples","authors":"Nikola Gardić, Dejan M. Miljković, Aleksandra N. Lovrenski","doi":"10.4103/joc.joc_4_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Nowadays, the separation of adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) is crucial given that there are new specific targeted therapies. So, the aim of this study was to examine the differences in cytomorphological features between ADC and SCC in bronchoscopic brush samples.\n \n \n \n The retrospective study was conducted over a 3-year period at Western Balkan University Hospital. All brushing samples were analysed. According to the histopathological report, patients were classified into ADC and SCC groups. The cytomorphological features analysed in 95 samples were presence of necrosis, cell distribution, nuclear atypia, size of nuclei, and visibility of nucleoli. Statistical analysis was performed in JASP, and P values <0.05 were considered significant.\n \n \n \n The necrotic background was more frequent in SCC samples. Small clusters sized ≤200 µm were found in 17.95% of samples from the SCC group and 53.57% in the ADC group. Large clusters sized >400 µm were found in 43.59% in the SCC group, while in the ADC group, it was found in 5.36%. There were no differences in nuclear atypia between groups. Nuclei that were >5x lymphocyte size were found more often in samples from ADC than in the SCC group (37.50 vs 10.25%). In 89.75% of samples from the SCC group, nuclei were ≤5x lymphocyte sizes, while in the ADC group, the percentage was 63.5%. Nucleoli were more often visible in samples from the ADC group compared to the SCC group (92.86% vs 64.10%, P < 0,05).\n \n \n \n Small clusters, large nuclei, and visible nucleoli were more frequent in the ADC group (P < 0.05), while large clusters, small nuclei, and invisible nucleoli were more frequent in the SCC group (P < 0.05).\n","PeriodicalId":50217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_4_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, the separation of adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) is crucial given that there are new specific targeted therapies. So, the aim of this study was to examine the differences in cytomorphological features between ADC and SCC in bronchoscopic brush samples. The retrospective study was conducted over a 3-year period at Western Balkan University Hospital. All brushing samples were analysed. According to the histopathological report, patients were classified into ADC and SCC groups. The cytomorphological features analysed in 95 samples were presence of necrosis, cell distribution, nuclear atypia, size of nuclei, and visibility of nucleoli. Statistical analysis was performed in JASP, and P values <0.05 were considered significant. The necrotic background was more frequent in SCC samples. Small clusters sized ≤200 µm were found in 17.95% of samples from the SCC group and 53.57% in the ADC group. Large clusters sized >400 µm were found in 43.59% in the SCC group, while in the ADC group, it was found in 5.36%. There were no differences in nuclear atypia between groups. Nuclei that were >5x lymphocyte size were found more often in samples from ADC than in the SCC group (37.50 vs 10.25%). In 89.75% of samples from the SCC group, nuclei were ≤5x lymphocyte sizes, while in the ADC group, the percentage was 63.5%. Nucleoli were more often visible in samples from the ADC group compared to the SCC group (92.86% vs 64.10%, P < 0,05). Small clusters, large nuclei, and visible nucleoli were more frequent in the ADC group (P < 0.05), while large clusters, small nuclei, and invisible nucleoli were more frequent in the SCC group (P < 0.05).
将细胞形态学特征作为刷状支气管镜样本中的非小细胞肺癌亚型划分工具
如今,鉴于有了新的特异性靶向疗法,将腺癌(ADC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)区分开来至关重要。因此,本研究旨在检查支气管镜刷状样本中 ADC 和 SCC 在细胞形态学特征上的差异。 这项回顾性研究在西巴尔干大学医院进行,为期三年。对所有刷状样本进行了分析。根据组织病理学报告,患者被分为 ADC 和 SCC 两组。在 95 份样本中分析的细胞形态学特征包括是否存在坏死、细胞分布、核不典型性、核大小和核小体可见度。统计分析在 JASP 中进行,P 值为 400 µm 的 SCC 组样本占 43.59%,而 ADC 组样本占 5.36%。各组之间的核不典型性没有差异。与 SCC 组相比,ADC 组样本中更常发现大于 5 倍淋巴细胞大小的细胞核(37.50% 对 10.25%)。在 89.75% 的 SCC 组样本中,核大小≤5 倍淋巴细胞大小,而在 ADC 组中,这一比例为 63.5%。与 SCC 组相比,ADC 组样本的核小体更常见(92.86% vs 64.10%,P < 0,05)。 小核团、大核和可见核小体在 ADC 组中更常见(P < 0.05),而大核团、小核和不可见核小体在 SCC 组中更常见(P < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cytology
Journal of Cytology MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cytology is the official Quarterly publication of the Indian Academy of Cytologists. It is in the 25th year of publication in the year 2008. The journal covers all aspects of diagnostic cytology, including fine needle aspiration cytology, gynecological and non-gynecological cytology. Articles on ancillary techniques, like cytochemistry, immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular cytopathology, as applied to cytological material are also welcome. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信