Toolkit for Ethical Assessment of Representation of Nations in Digital Military Games

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Mikhail Zagirnyak
{"title":"Toolkit for Ethical Assessment of Representation of Nations in Digital Military Games","authors":"Mikhail Zagirnyak","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-84-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study presents a toolkit for ethical assessment of the representation of national traits in military digital games, which rests on two pillars: 1) meta­ethical – ontological definition of the status of digital game’s being; 2) socio-an­thropological – definition of the role of the nation in the realization of human freedom. The meta-ethical pillar makes it possible to determine the status of being of digital games and reveal whether they influence the player’s view of the world beyond the game. Johan Huizinga’s concept of the magic circle in conjunction with the concept of an intellectual system of world model formulated by Vladimir Bryshinkin allows us to consider military digital games as intellectual products that shape understandings of man and the world. The socio-anthropological pillar of the research is focused on the Kantian concept of freedom as the basis of the criterion for assessing the image of a nation in digital games. The history of hu­mankind from the perspective of Kantian practical philosophy is the history of free development, in which all individuals and all nations should be equal par­ticipants. The toolkit of ethical assessment of national traits represented in digital military games can serve as a reason for their developers to reconceptualize their own responsibility for the content of the published work.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-84-93","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study presents a toolkit for ethical assessment of the representation of national traits in military digital games, which rests on two pillars: 1) meta­ethical – ontological definition of the status of digital game’s being; 2) socio-an­thropological – definition of the role of the nation in the realization of human freedom. The meta-ethical pillar makes it possible to determine the status of being of digital games and reveal whether they influence the player’s view of the world beyond the game. Johan Huizinga’s concept of the magic circle in conjunction with the concept of an intellectual system of world model formulated by Vladimir Bryshinkin allows us to consider military digital games as intellectual products that shape understandings of man and the world. The socio-anthropological pillar of the research is focused on the Kantian concept of freedom as the basis of the criterion for assessing the image of a nation in digital games. The history of hu­mankind from the perspective of Kantian practical philosophy is the history of free development, in which all individuals and all nations should be equal par­ticipants. The toolkit of ethical assessment of national traits represented in digital military games can serve as a reason for their developers to reconceptualize their own responsibility for the content of the published work.
数字军事游戏中国家代表性的伦理评估工具包
目前的研究提出了一个工具包,用于对军事数字游戏中民族特征的表现进行伦理评估,该工具包有两大支柱:1) 元伦理学--对数字游戏存在状态的本体论定义;2) 社会人类学--对民族在实现人类自由中的作用的定义。元伦理支柱使我们有可能确定数字游戏的存在状态,并揭示数字游戏是否会影响玩家对 游戏之外世界的看法。约翰-惠伊辛加(Johan Huizinga)的 "魔法阵 "概念与弗拉基米尔-布赖辛金(Vladimir Bryshinkin)提出的 "世界模型智力系统 "概念相结合,使我们能够将军事数字游戏视为塑造人类和世界认识的智力产品。研究的社会人类学支柱侧重于康德的自由概念,将其作为评估数字游戏中国家形象的标准基础。从康德实践哲学的角度来看,人类历史就是一部自由发展的历史,所有个人和所有国家都应平等地参与其中。对数字军事游戏中体现的民族特征进行伦理评估的工具包,可以成为游戏开发者重新认识 自己对出版作品内容所负责任的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信