Excess pore pressure behavior and evolution in deep coalbed methane reservoirs

IF 11.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING
Changqing Liu , Zhaobiao Yang , Yong Qin , Xia Yan , Yunhai Wang , Zhe Wang
{"title":"Excess pore pressure behavior and evolution in deep coalbed methane reservoirs","authors":"Changqing Liu ,&nbsp;Zhaobiao Yang ,&nbsp;Yong Qin ,&nbsp;Xia Yan ,&nbsp;Yunhai Wang ,&nbsp;Zhe Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deep coalbed methane (DCBM), an unconventional gas reservoir, has undergone significant advancements in recent years, sparking a growing interest in assessing pore pressure dynamics within these reservoirs. While some production data analysis techniques have been adapted from conventional oil and gas wells, there remains a gap in the understanding of pore pressure generation and evolution, particularly in wells subjected to large-scale hydraulic fracturing. To address this gap, a novel technique called excess pore pressure analysis (EPPA) has been introduced to the coal seam gas industry for the first time to our knowledge, which employs dual-phase flow principles based on consolidation theory. This technique focuses on the generation and dissipation for excess pore-water pressure (EPWP) and excess pore-gas pressure (EPGP) in stimulated deep coal reservoirs. Equations have been developed respectively and numerical solutions have been provided using the finite element method (FEM). Application of this model to a representative field example reveals that excess pore pressure arises from rapid loading, with overburden weight transferred under undrained condition due to intense hydraulic fracturing, which significantly redistributes the weight-bearing role from the solid coal structure to the injected fluid and liberated gas within artificial pores over a brief timespan. Furthermore, field application indicates that the dissipation of EPWP and EPGP can be actually considered as the process of well production, where methane and water are extracted from deep coalbed methane wells, leading to consolidation for the artificial reservoirs. Moreover, history matching results demonstrate that the excess-pressure model established in this study provides a better explanation for the declining trends observed in both gas and water production curves, compared to conventional practices in coalbed methane reservoir engineering and petroleum engineering. This research not only enhances the understanding of DCBM reservoir behavior but also offers insights applicable to production analysis in other unconventional resources reliant on hydraulic fracturing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48625,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mining Science and Technology","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 763-781"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268624000843/pdfft?md5=3530459fadc94ae26221e14fec5d6ef5&pid=1-s2.0-S2095268624000843-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mining Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268624000843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep coalbed methane (DCBM), an unconventional gas reservoir, has undergone significant advancements in recent years, sparking a growing interest in assessing pore pressure dynamics within these reservoirs. While some production data analysis techniques have been adapted from conventional oil and gas wells, there remains a gap in the understanding of pore pressure generation and evolution, particularly in wells subjected to large-scale hydraulic fracturing. To address this gap, a novel technique called excess pore pressure analysis (EPPA) has been introduced to the coal seam gas industry for the first time to our knowledge, which employs dual-phase flow principles based on consolidation theory. This technique focuses on the generation and dissipation for excess pore-water pressure (EPWP) and excess pore-gas pressure (EPGP) in stimulated deep coal reservoirs. Equations have been developed respectively and numerical solutions have been provided using the finite element method (FEM). Application of this model to a representative field example reveals that excess pore pressure arises from rapid loading, with overburden weight transferred under undrained condition due to intense hydraulic fracturing, which significantly redistributes the weight-bearing role from the solid coal structure to the injected fluid and liberated gas within artificial pores over a brief timespan. Furthermore, field application indicates that the dissipation of EPWP and EPGP can be actually considered as the process of well production, where methane and water are extracted from deep coalbed methane wells, leading to consolidation for the artificial reservoirs. Moreover, history matching results demonstrate that the excess-pressure model established in this study provides a better explanation for the declining trends observed in both gas and water production curves, compared to conventional practices in coalbed methane reservoir engineering and petroleum engineering. This research not only enhances the understanding of DCBM reservoir behavior but also offers insights applicable to production analysis in other unconventional resources reliant on hydraulic fracturing.

深部煤层气储层的过高孔隙压力行为和演变
深层煤层气(DCBM)是一种非常规天然气储层,近年来取得了重大进展,激发了人们对评估这些储层内孔隙压力动态的兴趣。虽然一些生产数据分析技术已从常规油气井中借鉴过来,但对孔隙压力产生和演化的理解仍然存在差距,尤其是在进行大规模水力压裂的油气井中。针对这一空白,我们首次在煤层气行业引入了一种名为过剩孔隙压力分析(EPPA)的新技术,该技术采用了基于固结理论的双相流原理。该技术主要研究受刺激深层煤储层中过剩孔隙水压力(EPWP)和过剩孔隙气压力(EPGP)的产生和消散。分别建立了方程,并使用有限元法(FEM)提供了数值解。将该模型应用于一个具有代表性的现场实例表明,孔隙压力过大源于快速加载,由于强烈的水力压裂作用,覆盖层重量在不排水条件下发生转移,从而在短时间内将承重作用从固态煤结构大幅重新分配到人工孔隙中的注入流体和释放气体上。此外,现场应用表明,EPWP 和 EPGP 的耗散实际上可视为油井生产过程,即从煤层气深井中抽取甲烷和水,从而导致人工储层固结的过程。此外,历史匹配结果表明,与煤层气储层工程和石油工程的传统做法相比,本研究建立的过压模型能更好地解释在产气和产水曲线上观察到的下降趋势。这项研究不仅加深了人们对煤层气储层行为的理解,还为其他依赖水力压裂的非常规资源的生产分析提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
2541
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, founded in 1990 as the Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, is a monthly English-language journal. It publishes original research papers and high-quality reviews that explore the latest advancements in theories, methodologies, and applications within the realm of mining sciences and technologies. The journal serves as an international exchange forum for readers and authors worldwide involved in mining sciences and technologies. All papers undergo a peer-review process and meticulous editing by specialists and authorities, with the entire submission-to-publication process conducted electronically.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信